E
Erich
Guest
So, Scripture is wrong?I disagree. Baptism does not cleanse sins.
Baptism is salvific, not just symbolic.
So, Scripture is wrong?I disagree. Baptism does not cleanse sins.
Scripture is not wrong. Water can not wash away even the smallest sin. Only the blood of Jesus.
The NT is full of warning about false teachers and wolves in sheep’s clothing. Jesus, Peter, Paul, John all constantly speak of it. No church is immune, yet Jesus said to let the tares grow with the wheat. I know there are Pentecostal preachers who have a money machine going that is not of God. But the Lord will deal with it and He will do much better than we can.Of course, no Christian church wants to have 1 Tim. 4;1 pointed at them. everyone wants to be on the right side of scripture and teaching. Not seeing the issue of authority as something that stands out in scripture is the result of stubbornly refusing to take the blinders off for fear that it may lead to an uncertainty about what you have believed up to this point. I understand that some outside the Catholic church will accept some apostolic authority that was present during the apostles lifetime, but then after the death of the last apostle it ceased to be an issue because at that point the Holy Spirit took over the church to guide each individual in a personal way, be it an invisible church as some profess, or not. The substance of 1 Cor. 1:10 is worth doing a good amount of reflecting on for those who think authority over teachings is not an issue.
Indeed, I agree that these Jewish histories are valuable as such, except for the goofy stuff like Bel and the Dragon. But for me, I would not make use of them to formulate basic doctrines. You say that the sin of the soldiers was only a slight sin. Just a little lucky charm. Yet you failed to mention or notice that they all died because God himself killed them. Does this speak of small or slight sins? Really, is this the way Catholics interpret scripture? Can you show anywhere that God will kill as a response to a slight sin? I’m different than you bro. In my book, this speaks of ultimate seriousness. Not about a small imperfection. Thus, this passage cannot be speaking of a Purgatory as defined by the Catholic Church.Rejecting the inspiration and canonicity of II Maccabees does not negate its historical value. Maccabees aids us in knowing, purely from an historical perspective at the very least, the Jews believed in praying and making atonement for the dead shortly before the advent of Christ. This is the faith in which Jesus and the apostles were raised. And it is in this context Jesus declares in the New Testament:
And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come (Matthew 12:32).
This declaration of our Lord implies there are at least some sins that can be forgiven in the next life to a people who already believed it. If Jesus wanted to condemn this teaching commonly taught in Israel, he was not doing a very good job of it according to St. Matthew’s Gospel.
The next objection presents a more complex problem. The punishment for mortal sin is, in fact, definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed in Hell according to Catholic teaching (see CCC 1030). But it is a non-sequitur to conclude from this teaching that II Maccabees could not be referring to a type of Purgatory.
First of all, a careful reading of the text reveals the sin of these men to be carrying small amulets “or sacred tokens of the idols of Jamnia” under their tunics as they were going in to battle. This would be closer to a Christian baseball player believing there is some kind of power in his performing superstitious rituals before going to bat than it would be to the mortal sin of idolatry. This was, most likely, a venial sin for them. But even if what they did would have been objectively grave matter, good Jews in ancient times—just like good Catholics today—believed they should always pray for the souls of those who have died “for thou [O Lord], thou only knowest the hearts of the children of men” (II Chr. 6:30). God alone knows the degree of culpability of these “sinners.” Moreover, some or all of them may have repented before they died. Both Jews and Catholic Christians always retain hope for the salvation of the deceased this side of heaven; thus, we always pray for those who have died.
A Plainer Text
In Matthew 5:24-25, Jesus is even more explicit about Purgatory:
Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; truly I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny (Matthew 5:25-26).
For Catholics, Tertullian for example, in De Anima 58, written in ca. AD 208, this teaching is parabolic, using the well-known example of “prison” and the necessary penitence it represents, as a metaphor for Purgatorial suffering that will be required for lesser transgressions, represented by the “kodrantes” or “penny” of verse 26. But for many Protestants, our Lord is here giving simple instructions to his followers concerning this life exclusively. This has nothing to do with Purgatory.
Further, as St. John points out in John 20:31, all Scripture is written “that believing, you may have [eternal] life in his name.” Scripture must always be viewed in the context of our full realization of the divine life in the world to come. Our present life is presented “as a vapor which appears for a little while, and afterwards shall vanish away” (James 1:17). It would seem odd to see the deeper and even “other worldly” emphasis throughout the Sermon of the Mount, excepting these two verses.
When we add to this the fact that the Greek word for prison, phulake, is the same word used by St. Peter, in I Peter 3:19, to describe the “holding place” into which Jesus descended after his death to liberate the detained spirits of Old Testament believers, the Catholic position makes even more sense. Phulake is demonstrably used in the New Testament to refer to a temporary holding place and not exclusively in this life.
(cont.)
I would be careful to not be too hasty in assuming that only the “works” of a person is being talked about here. If you look at the entire contents of what is being said by Paul, you can see that what he is referring to is how a person builds on “the” foundation that Paul or a co-worker lays. The foundation is Jesus Christ. What a person builds on the foundation is a “building” (verse 9) obviously. The building is not just “works”, but the entire person, both your “faith and works”. When Paul speaks of “the work of each will come to light” (verse13) he is not talking specically of “works” (good deeds) but the whole of what a person has done with what they have been given. Another way Paul puts it is to say ministers, such as he or another, plants and waters, and growth occurs in the person by God. That growth is not only the “works” of the person but everything that they have built on the foundation originally layed for them. The sins of the person are part of the person and will come to light on the Day.Now you want to use 1Cor.3:15- as a proof text, but here we are speaking only of “works”, not sins as in your other citations. Please decide which one applies to Purgatory before we can continue with this.
Thanks, Eazy
It’s not that mere water takes away sin; otherwise, anyone who has ever taken a bath or gone for a swim would be forgiven of all their sins. No, it is that through the waters of initiation into the faith, we are baptized INTO CHRIST that is salvific.Scripture is not wrong. Water can not wash away even the smallest sin. Only the blood of Jesus.
Rm.3:25 through faith in His blood
Rm.5:9 we are justified by His blood
Eph.1:7 we have forgiveness through His blood
Heb.9:22 without the shedding of blood is no remission
1Pt.1:18,19 redeemed with… the precious blood of Christ
If water could do the job, then Jesus died needlessly.
The NT is also full of warning and admonitions about remaining obedient to the leaders of the Church which have been established by God. There are NO verses which tell you to go it alone in order to avoid the possibility of encountering false teachers and wolves.The NT is full of warning about false teachers and wolves in sheep’s clothing. Jesus, Peter, Paul, John all constantly speak of it. No church is immune, yet Jesus said to let the tares grow with the wheat. I know there are Pentecostal preachers who have a money machine going that is not of God. But the Lord will deal with it and He will do much better than we can.
As I have said before, it is the “fear of the Lord” that will bring me home safely.
Maccabees is not used to formulate a basic doctrine like Purgatory. However, it does provide historical evidence that belief in a state like Purgatory was common in Jesus’ day. If that belief was erroneous, Jesus did not correct that error; however, He did speak directly to other issues such as the allowances for divorce. Thus, it appears that Jesus let the idea of Purgatory stand.Indeed, I agree that these Jewish histories are valuable as such, except for the goofy stuff like Bel and the Dragon. But for me, I would not make use of them to formulate basic doctrines.
Some of the things (or works) that we do in this life are good and some are sinful. God will judge all that we have done, and those things that are good will be refined in the fire while the bad things that we have done will be burned away. Thus, the man passing through the refiners’ fire will be purified of all dross so that he may stand before God without imperfection.Now you want to use 1Cor.3:15- as a proof text, but here we are speaking only of “works”, not sins as in your other citations. Please decide which one applies to Purgatory before we can continue with this.
So, if Scripture is not wrong, then it’s your fallible interpretation which must be wrong.Scripture is not wrong. Water can not wash away even the smallest sin.
What were the Jews asking in verse 37? They were asking to be told what they must do in order to have their sins forgiven. Clearly, in spite of the fact that they were already believers in Jesus at the time they asked their question, they were still in their sins (thus disproving the idea that we are saved at the point of faith).22 “Fellow Israelites, listen to this: Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know.
23 This man was handed over to you by God’s deliberate plan and foreknowledge; and you, with the help of wicked men, put him to death by nailing him to the cross.
24 But God raised him from the dead, freeing him from the agony of death, because it was impossible for death to keep its hold on him.
25 David said about him:
“‘I saw the Lord always before me.
Because he is at my right hand,
I will not be shaken.
26 Therefore my heart is glad and my tongue rejoices;
my body also will rest in hope,
27 because you will not abandon me to the realm of the dead,
you will not let your holy one see decay.
28 You have made known to me the paths of life;
you will fill me with joy in your presence.’
29 “Fellow Israelites, I can tell you confidently that the patriarch David died and was buried, and his tomb is here to this day.
30 But he was a prophet and knew that God had promised him on oath that he would place one of his descendants on his throne.
31 Seeing what was to come, he spoke of the resurrection of the Messiah, that he was not abandoned to the realm of the dead, nor did his body see decay.
32 God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it.
33 Exalted to the right hand of God, he has received from the Father the promised Holy Spirit and has poured out what you now see and hear.
34 For David did not ascend to heaven, and yet he said,
“‘The Lord said to my Lord:
“Sit at my right hand
35 until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet.”’
36 “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah.”
37 When the people heard this, they were cut to the heart and said to Peter and the other apostles, “Brothers, what shall we do?”
38 Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
I wanted to clarify something earlier just to be sure there was no misunderstanding, in my last sentence above I did not mean to imply that all our sins remain with us until death, but the ultimate purification from past sin, before our heavenly reward is bestowed on us, is accomplished through what we call Purgatory. We do not know the time frame of Purgatory, it could occur in an instant at the Judgement, we just do not know exactly. The church came up with the term Purgatory to define that period of time or moment when this occurs, in order that we can give an explanation to those who should ask.I would be careful to not be too hasty in assuming that only the “works” of a person is being talked about here. If you look at the entire contents of what is being said by Paul, you can see that what he is referring to is how a person builds on “the” foundation that Paul or a co-worker lays. The foundation is Jesus Christ. What a person builds on the foundation is a “building” (verse 9) obviously. The building is not just “works”, but the entire person, both your “faith and works”. When Paul speaks of “the work of each will come to light” (verse13) he is not talking specically of “works” (good deeds) but the whole of what a person has done with what they have been given. Another way Paul puts it is to say ministers, such as he or another, plants and waters, and growth occurs in the person by God. That growth is not only the “works” of the person but everything that they have built on the foundation originally layed for them. The sins of the person are part of the person and will come to light on the Day.
Matthew 21:25I disagree. Baptism does not cleanse sins. Public Baptism started with John the Baptist who also baptized Jesus. I wonder if John himself was baptized.
In the parable the good seeds were sown first (Apostles and their successors), then the weeds appeared (false teachers).The NT is full of warning about false teachers and wolves in sheep’s clothing. Jesus, Peter, Paul, John all constantly speak of it. No church is immune, yet Jesus said to let the tares grow with the wheat.
And this is precisely why…St. Paul was led by the HS to go to Jerusalem and submit his gospel…Galatians 2:2 I went in response to a revelation and, meeting privately with those esteemed as leaders, I presented to them the gospel that I preach among the Gentiles. I wanted to be sure I was not running and had not been running my race in vain.The NT is full of warning about false teachers and wolves in sheep’s clothing. Jesus, Peter, Paul, John all constantly speak of it. No church is immune, yet Jesus said to let the tares grow with the wheat. I know there are .
John 3:22I disagree. Baptism does not cleanse sins. Public Baptism started with John the Baptist who also baptized Jesus. I wonder if John himself was baptized.
I am not trying to make my own interpretation but just read what the scripture says. You are not. You ignored the word “repent”. It is a part of the equation. If you do not factor in all the parts in an equation, you will get a false result.So, if Scripture is not wrong, then it’s your fallible interpretation which must be wrong.
In Acts 2 we read,
What were the Jews asking in verse 37? They were asking to be told what they must do in order to have their sins forgiven. Clearly, in spite of the fact that they were already believers in Jesus at the time they asked their question, they were still in their sins (thus disproving the idea that we are saved at the point of faith).
And what did Peter tell them to do? Did he say, “Since you are already believers, you have nothing to do, you are already saved”? No. *He told them to be baptized for the forgiveness of their sins. *So, water can (and does) wash away sin.
Interesting assertion. But you’ve failed to provide any explanation for even one of the citations provided being in the Bible if your assertion is correct.Scripture is not wrong.
False dichotomy.Water can not wash away even the smallest sin. Only the blood of Jesus.
It’s not the water doing the job; it’s the following of Jesus’ command.If water could do the job, then Jesus died needlessly.
You don’t have to take my word for it… The Lord himself affirms that baptism is necessary for salvation in John 3:5.So, you fail to convince.
Interesting that you should say that. As a good Pentecostal I presume you believe the following (among other things):I am not trying to make my own interpretation but** just read what the scripture says**.
Finally, we see in Rev. 5:8 that the saints in heaven offer to God the prayers of the saints on earth. Yes, Jesus is the only mediator between man and God (1 Tim. 2:5), but this in no way means we cannot or should not ask our fellow Christians to pray with us and for us (1 Tim. 2:1–4). In particular, we should ask the intercession of those Christians in heaven, who have already had their sanctification completed, for “[t]he prayer of a righteous man has great power in its effects” (James.5:16).1.) Do you believe that most Christians are still sinning at the end of their lives or that they still have attachments to sins at the end of their lives?
2.) Do you believe there will be any Christian in Heaven who is still sinning or who has attachments to sin?
3.) If you answered yes to 1, and no to 2, how do you explain this? What happens after death to those people who fall into 1 above so that 2 can be true?
Indeed.If you do not factor in all the parts in an equation, you will get a false result.
**Interesting, eazy. There are countless denominations and faith communities out there that are doing just that, they “read what scripture says.” Interesting how many of them arrive at different, contradictory conclusions to the meaning behind, “what scripture says” on countless issues.I am not trying to make my own interpretation but just read what the scripture says.