Worship Jesus Christ…go ahead
The Bahai religion praises those who truly worship Jesus, and follow His commandments.
There’s a difference between worshipping a “foreign god” like Marilyn Manson, and worshipping Jesus Christ, let’s get some perspective…
The thing is, that through interpretations of those who “claim” to be guided by the Holy Spirit, some religions have created their own idols.
What is the difference between Marilyn Manson and the pastor down my road saying that the Holy Spirit has guided him to teach abstinence from socialising with non-Christians?
I think you will find that there are a whole lot of teachings in true Christianity and the Bahai Faith which are one and the same, either in word or in spirit, or both.
These are the points of focus.
Nothing else matters in the eyes of God.
.
We all know what you mean by worship. It is not the same worship you give to God the almighty which is beyond all description and but our words only reflect but a partial understanding of his glory, right? Worship in the way you use it in your sentence above, is only a deep reverence, very high but not the worship due to the one God. Or do you offer the same worship to all the divine manifestations? I hope not, if only for the sake of your monotheism. But if Christians are wrong and Jesus is a creature, merely obedient to God, what is the difference in worshiping him or whomever? Sure, you regard Jesus as a super spirit whom was with God for all eternity, but you also believe the universe eternal and that the universe reflects the divine as well. You however don’t think we can worship the universe and recognize the absurdity of that statement by saying we shouldn’t worship Marilyn manson who is a product of the universe.
But since you made this claim. The thing is, that through interpretations of those who “claim” to be guided by the Holy Spirit, some religions have created their own idols. Give an example as to what religion. I’m sure you have in mind Christianity right. Or are we blameless before God? In so far as preserving the truth is concerned? (So don’t bring up our moral deficiencies as if we were not already aware of them or history, its irrelevant to my question) Or have we erred and corrupted the faith partially? If the answer is the second, i ask that you demonstrate it, when where and how.
I also disagree that you could agree with the teachings of the Christian faith. I would quote the bible but you would merely interpret it differently than Christians. Although i think it has been shown in the past the bahai interpretation wanting. I think it here appropriate to quote certain fathers whom I think you would have to maintain as mistaken, those closest to the apostles for instance. I maintain if you are to say Christianity has been corrupted, you should say it was done right from the get go, literally as soon as Jesus was killed.
Consider Ignatius to the Ephesians
For some are in the habit of carrying about the name [of Jesus Christ] in wicked guile, while yet they practise things unworthy of God, whom you must flee as you would wild beasts. For they are ravening dogs, who bite secretly, against whom you must be on your guard, inasmuch as they are men who can scarcely be cured. There is one Physician who is possessed both of flesh and spirit; both made and not made; God existing in flesh; true life in death; both of Mary and of God; first passible and then impassible— even Jesus Christ our Lord.
He tells the Ephesians to avoid heretics, to not associate with them (in this case being the gnostics). To be on gaurd against them. The bahai faith which is ultra inclusivist (except when you attempt to join, in which case you must submit yourself to a canon of presribed doctrines and dogmas, even if you don’t call it that) cannot possiblly accede to Ignatius on any level. You would say to Ignatius calmly if he were still alive. “Brother why are you not accepting those who merely say and believe different things than you? We are all one in humanity, we all have the one God? Why cannot we be one in action as well as our spirit?”
To which I imagine Ignatius saying something like this.
“Do not err… Those that corrupt families shall not inherit the kingdom of God. 1Corinthians 6:9-10 If, then, those who do this as respects the flesh have suffered death, how much more shall this be the case with any one who corrupts by wicked doctrine the faith of God, for which Jesus Christ was crucified! Such an one becoming defiled [in this way], shall go away into everlasting fire, and so shall every one that hearkens unto him. Be not anointed with the bad odour of the doctrine of the prince of this world; let him not lead you away captive from the life which is set before you. And why are we not all prudent, since we have received the knowledge of God, which is Jesus Christ? Why do we foolishly perish, not recognising the gift which the Lord has of a truth sent to us?”
To which, if you persist in the current argument would have to say. “Look brother, we do not disagree. Let there be no talk of hell fire because there is no such thing. Christ rose from the dead spiritually, we have no need of the Christian communion.”
To which Ignatius might say. “I… entreat you that you use Christian nourishment only, and abstain from herbage of a different kind; I mean heresy. For those [that are given to this] mix up Jesus Christ with their own poison, speaking things which are unworthy of credit,”
And to which I might add, “You say we do not disagree, yet you constantly try to reinterpret our phrases into something we didn’t mean.”
There is another thread for discussing whether we are one same religion. I will respond to you there should you choose to respond to me here.