When did Mary fully believe in Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daniel_Marsh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi homewardbound, the phrase, “mother of my Lord” in the gospel is not referring to Mary as “Mother of my God”, it in context is simply referring to lord as meaning “master” nothing more. The error of taking lord here to mean God comes from misunderstanding the meaning of Jewish names-titles. My name is Daniel which means simply “God is judge” that does not make me God, the judge of mankind.

We know for example, that when Jesus was left behind in the temple that his parents did not understand Jesus’ mission on earth.

Luke 2
40And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him.

41Now his parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover.

42And when he was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast.

43And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and his mother knew not of it.

44But they, supposing him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey; and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance.

45And when they found him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking him.

46And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.

47And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers.

48And when they saw him, they were amazed: and his mother said unto him, **Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? **behold, thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.

49And **he said unto them, How is it that ye sought me? wist ye not that I must be about my Father’s business? **

50And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.

51And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: **but his mother kept all these sayings in her heart. **

52And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

In Luke 2, verse 49 Jesus tells his parents that he was doing his Father’s business. verse 50 tells us that his parents did NOT understand the meaning of Jesus’ words. But, in verse 50 Mary hid Jesus’ saying in her heart to ponder their meaning which tells me that Mary at this time did not fully understand the meaning and signifance of his words.

If you do not know about Mohammads’ violent and immoral life, get a copy of this muslim book and read for yourself.

Twenty Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammad by Ali Dashti (Author), F. R. C. Bagley (Translator)
Who was Elisabeth’s “master”?

Up until that point,
when discussing spiritual matters,
only The Triune God was referred to as “Lord”.
 
not to interject, but let’s go back to what Gabriel said to Mary, “Hail Mary, Full of Grace” So exactly how full is full?

How full makes an angel of God address her as being full of grace? is it a fullness consisting of all the graces, a few to an extrodinary degree? if this is the case, why call her “full of grace” is a glass of water full if it has several drinks of water in it? of course not, but to use the same metaphore, Mary, like the cup, was overflowing. She is full of grace exactly as the angel of God proclaimed, exactly as the scriptures declare. Is it any small wonder that this fullness should include the gift of faith? or shall we forget that faith is a gift of the Spirit, a grace given to us by God. Mary knew and believed before she obediently submitted to God saying behold the handmaiden of the Lord.
I love that one.

How could she be “full” of grace AND a sinner simultaneously? Does God grace sinners completely “before” Jesus’ sacrifice that came to wipe away our original sin?

(Then they say “Stephen was full of grace too!” and I slam the door on that exchange with, “But that was AFTER Jesus when everybody else could be as sinnless as Mary facilitating the negative factor that would allow for one to be free of sin and full of grace.” Then, I hear crickets chirping.)

🤷

I feel another thread being born here!

😃
 
I am thinking that Mary did not fully understand, realize that Jesus is the Messiah until after the resurrection. When do you think Mary fully believed in Jesus as the Christ, Messiah?
Mary, being a young Jewish girl well versed in the Old Testament, knew about the coming of the Messiah. (read the OT). Having been created by God to be the Mother of HIS SON, she was filled with the FULLNESS of GRACE from conception, ( Hail, Full of Grace)) Grace brings WISDOM, (a gift from God), To be Full of Grace does not mean she knew as much as God does, ( Eve found that out in the Garden and she was full of Grace too) but it does mean she knew what God wanted her to know, (infused knowledge,) Even if we just take what we think she knew, her teaching from childhood, what the Angel said to her, what Elizabeth said (after being Filled with the Holy Spirit), (Read your BIble), At the Birth of Jesus, when shepherds and Kings came to worship HIM, the flight into Egypt, yes, even at the finding of Jesus in the Temple, when He said, " Do you not know I must be about MY Father’s Business". but never the less, He was subject to them and returned home with them. At the wedding feast at Cana, ( where Jesus worked HIS first Miracle at her request) "We would all do well to listen to her when she says, “Do as HE tells you.” Who are we to question the Wisdom of God in such a precious time in our human history. We should be down on our knees thanking God. And doing everything we can to bring about the Unity of Faith, that Jesus prayed for. God Bless.
 
Daniel, in what sense would any lesser prophet be Elizabeth’s ‘Lord’, though? None of the other prophets are ever recorded as being addressed as ‘Lord’, are they?
 
Judging by her canticle (the Magnificat - my soul magnifes the Lord…etc) I would say Mary had a good grasp of scripture.

Essentially the angel came down (Luke Ch1) and told Mary that she would give birth to the Son of God i.e. the Messiah/Christ.

Being a virgin, Mary was a tad perplexed as she assumed she would have to have sex with Joseph and break her vow and wondered why. The angel explained that she wouldn’t have to have sex - Holy Spirit overshadowing her.

So Mary said OK. Be it done to me according to your word. And Mary belived that she would give birth to the Messiah

Luke 1:45 "And blessed, are you who believed, that the things spoken to you by the Lord would be fulfilled.”
 
To me there are two separate issues: knowing and understanding what it all meant.

When did she know? Day one. She knew who he was and who is Daddy was the whole time.

When did she fully comprehend it all? I think that this was an ongoing process. She had an advantage over the Apostles, so she was always farther along the story, but I do think that it took until either the Resurection or Pentecost for it to all click. I am pretty sure she did not know he would suffer and die as he did.
 
This is the most proposterous question I have ever heard! Have you ever read the fathers Dan? Have you read the passage where Gabriel visits Mary? Did you know that Jews had a profound understanding of the scriptures, and Mary was no exception.

The very fact that she was conceiving as a virgin points to a passage she would have known well concerning the messiah. Gabriel himself calls Jesus the Son of the Most High. He tells her about how Jesus will save his people. Do you think that she would not have heard that the messiah was to be a light of revelation to the gentiles?

Do you really think even if all this passed over the head of the most blessed and grace filled human being ever created by God, that Jesus would not have informed her completely?

What was the point of Gabriel asking Mary for her consent to such an enormous task if she was ignorant of all that was to happen to the messiah. Not only did she say yes to giving birth to Christ but also to the immense suffering that she would have to suffer as she watched her Lord and son be tortured and killed in a most horrible fashion. She said yes to God in taking part in plan of salvation.

Without Mary, Daniel you would have no chance of salvation. Without her “be it done unto me according to thy will” we would still be under the penalty of one womans sin. But as it is, One Most Blessed Woman has participated in Gods plan freely and helped to set us free.

She alone was created without sin and therefore she alone could have given birth to God the Son.

Now leave my Mother alone and rather than blast her every chance you guys get, why not offer thanks to God by thanking Him for such a wonderful gift as Mary Mother of the Lord Jesus Christ, and Mother of the Church.
👍 :clapping: :clapping: :clapping: :extrahappy:
 

Which is all of a piece with the insistence that Abraham’s children are not those who are circumcised in the flesh, but those who are circumcised in heart.​

“The flesh profits nothing” (John 6) - bodily descent from Abraham is undercut completely, by Jesus’s insistence that his mother & brothers are those who do the Will of God; this lesson is reflected by St. Paul & St. John, and by the other Evangelists.

It may well have been shocking to hear such talk, but that would not make it untrue; this is something we need to learn too, IMO: Jesus threatens our religious securities, and our family ones (it’s amazing that such a family-Breaker is thought of as a guarantor of the stability of the family :))

He is not affirming the family - not even His. He is redefining it, by counting as His family those who do the Will of His Father. The family is itself a good thing - so it can become a correspondingly hideous idol; and that is simply not on: nothing, not even the family, not even the family of Jesus Himself, is allowed to stand in the way of His uncompromising, total, unreserved, self-forgetting, self-sacrificing, universal, perfect obedience to His His Father in Heaven.

He also universalises His family - anyone can be his kin, if they have the same attitude as He does: His zeal for His Father’s Will; relationship to God is no longer by descent from Abraham. Jesus’ universal mission starts in His family, but cannot be confined to it.

ISTM that Daniel is saying things we Catholics need to hear - what we don’t like, may be just what we need to be told. It is not at all dissing Mary to insist that Our Lord’s Love for her is not the supreme motive for His acts - it wasn’t. She is not important enough for that - only the Father of Jesus, the God by Whose grace she became the mother of His Beloved Son, is *that *important.

To put it another way: the fact that even His Love for Mary could not be allowed to get in the way of Jesus’ utter dedication to His Father’s Will, allows Jesus’ Love for Mary to be great - yet even so, it is not allowed to be supreme. It can have a high place - provided it is not given the highest place. No creature is worthy to be loved with that total unbounded devotion - that love is so great, that God alone deserves it, because it is the Love of the Heart of the man Who is God. It would not make sense for God Incarnate to give to Mary, a creature, that Love which God alone can receive. For Jesus to prefer His mother to His Father, would make God an idolater (!) 🙂

Jesus was tempted to avoid the Cross by Peter - Peter surely did not mean to voice a temptation Jesus recognised as satanic, but that is how Jesus took what Peter said; even those closest to us can be stumbling blocks to us, with the best of intentions. It is a miracle, nothing less, if Mary was not as great a danger to her Son as Peter was, and surely not the least of her graces. ##
** Most of the above is not true. Jesus loved his mother and his mother knew all about the status of Jesus even before he was born. This is all described in the Quran. She was told all the good things about a son who was promised even before she concieved him, even before she went out of the temple with Joseph the carpentar.

When Mary gave birth to Jesus (in difficult situation) in hopelessness, she was comforted and guided by Allah as to what to do. All these things are described in the chapter 3 of Quran and also chapter 19 titled “Maryam”.

The gospels have not done a good job with Mary the mother. They downplayed her and caused some disrespect from Jesus for her, as mentioned in the above post. The Quran has denied that too (19:32). It says that Jesus was very kind to his mother, that was after he had started preaching. It is mentioned “mother” and we feel that his father (Joseph) had died by then. That is why Jesus said that he was taught to be very kind and gentle to his mother (19:32).

Bible has forgotten (into oblivion) the greatest of all personages, Mary the mother of Jesus. The christians have disregarded her importance in the whole matter.

Let me tell you another thing. Mary was told by God (Through the angel, of course) that she need not enter into any dialogue or preaching about religion. She should not do any such good thing.( 19:26). All that would be done by her son (Jesus). This is all in the Quran.
I may post the relevant verses in this topic soon.
**
 
This is all described in the Quran. She was told all the good things about a son who was promised even before she concieved him

THIS is mentioned in the Bible.
When Mary gave birth to Jesus (in difficult situation) in hopelessness, she was comforted and guided by Allah as to what to do. All these things are described in the chapter 3 of Quran and also chapter 19 titled “Maryam”.
 
Understanding fully? To understand Jesus fully is to understand God fully - it is impossible for us to understand fully. For Blessed Virgin Mary, I don’t know as she was always pondering in Her Heart.

Believing? Sure, she did.
 
Despite the inevitable arguments, this is a rather interesting topic. As I began to pray the Rosary I found myself asking the same question…particularly as I prayed the Joyful Mysteries. I try to sort of put myself in Mary’s place emotionally…how I imagine she must have felt at the time of the annunciation. (How many questions and doubts I would have had!!) How, at the visitation, she must have been both reassured that she understood the message of Gabriel, and again, somewhat frightened by it’s implications. Christ’s birth drawing shepards and wise men…then at the presentation in the temple, having two people proclaim her baby to be the Messiah. Do you suppose she was really starting to get the picture then?

I have children of my own, and I was completely blown away that God would trust me so much as to allow me to raise them. Can you imagine the pressure of raising God’s own Son? She had to be “full of grace”!!

It wasn’t until watching Mel Gibsons “The Passion of the Christ” that I began to fully appreciate what Mary must have gone through. What remarkable faith that woman had! If God were to tell me that my child must suffer and die to redeem mankind, I think I’d be begging Him to find another way.

The way I figure it, she had to have known on some level. Otherwise she’d have done everything in her power to stop Jesus from following through with what must have looked like a mission of self-destruction.
 
Understanding fully? To understand Jesus fully is to understand God fully - it is impossible for us to understand fully. For Blessed Virgin Mary, I don’t know as she was always pondering in Her Heart.

Believing? Sure, she did.
I meant it along the lines of understanding as well as a human can. You are correct that God cannot be understood here on earth. I doubt that after Pentecost, John or Peter understood any more than she did.
 
Man, I hate it when people say ‘She did. Enough said’, ‘No. Enough said’ without giving any logical argument/explanation to back up their claim.

Mary, is the mother of Christ. That much we can agree on. As a result, we can relate to this because some of us may be mothers, and indeed, I am sure all of us had mothers.

Having a mother, is an intimate relationship, built on a love so pure and personal that it is a force to be reckoned with. What we must remember is that our mothers held us in their wombs, from the time we were conceived to the moment we were welcomed into the wide world. For that period, we were surrounded in her warmth, and loving embrace and protection.

An ideal case of a mother, she would have carried us willingly, because she wanted to be a mother. Now, being a man I can’t relate to this, but I am guessing that the idea of being a mother, and then the feeling of your child, another human being growing inside you, that will change a woman.

Mary, a young Jew, was told by Gabriel that not only was she ‘full of grace’, but that she was to be the mother of God, Jesus Christ. Now, ‘full of grace’ means that she was filled with God her entire life, and that she was free from all sin, forever. She is not a sinner, she, like her son, is the perfect role model for being pure and sinless, hence her title, the Virgin Mary, one who is in a state of purity, of virginity.

The Magnificat tells us that she is someone special. She understands what has happened in the Old Covenant, and that the time of fulfillment is at hand. Her humility and trust in God is why she is both chosen and is full of grace; she trusts God.

So, in terms of fulfilling the covenant, and Jesus being the Christ, I have no doubt that she trusts Him. In the idea of getting to know her son, as only a mother can, I think that she loves him unconditionally, and that she grows to know Him, and as Scripture teaches, she kept everything in her heart. She carried Him in her womb, she birthed Him, nursed him with her breast. In times of fear and trouble, she comforted our Lord. When He was on the cross, she begged Him to let her die with Him.

She loves Jesus, because she is His mother. What kind of mother could she be if she did not believe in her own son?
 
**Interesting discussion from the church point of view I am a Muslim. Please know this matter from the Muslim point of view. Briefly, (All from the Quran)…
  1. Mary is sinless. Even the devil does not come near her. All good believers of any faiths are likened to Mary in Quran. She is the symbol of purity.
  2. Jesus was sinless too.
  3. Mary was told all about the conception and birth of a son even before she left the synagogue (temple).
  4. Mary was told all about the special qualities of her son and his mission before his birth.
  5. Mary was guided by God at the time of delivery and even afterwards.
  6. All that I am writing is in the Quran. No doubt about it.
  7. Mary used to preach i.e. address and guide people while she was in temple.
  8. She used to pray to God and God gave her special fruits (knowledge).
  9. While still in the temple and no hope of ever getting married, Mary was told that she will bear a son and that son will be a messenger for the Israelis.
  10. That son would perform miracles. In other words, Mary knew all about Jesus even before conceiving him.
  11. She was forbidden to speak (guide, teach, address) when Jesus was born. She was told that she need not speak any more. The son will do all that.
There are many more things. But I leave the matter here. Quran also tells us that Jesus was always loving and faithful, obedient to his mother. Peace.**.
 
Mary always fully believed in Jesus…she didn’t always UNDERSTAND his mission.
 
Mary always fully believed in Jesus…she didn’t always UNDERSTAND his mission.
**Why? Was she dull? or not concerned? or irreligious? What could be the cause of not understanding the mission of Jesus?

According to Quran, she was told all about the mission of Jesus even before she concieved him. Only she did not have to argue on behalf of Jesus to support him. That is also mentioned in the Quran (19:26)

[19:24] Then the angel called her from beneath her, saying, 'Grieve not. Thy Lord has placed a rivulet below thee;
[19:25] 'And shake towards thyself the trunk of the palm-tree; it will drop upon thee fresh ripe dates;
[19:26] 'So, eat and drink and cool thine eye. And if thou seest any man, say, ‘I have vowed a fast to the Gracious God; I will, therefore, not speak this day to any human being.’
[19:27] Then she brought him to her people, mounted. They said, 'O Mary, surely, thou hast committed a monstrous thing!

She knew all about the mission of Jesus. Was she not with him when Jesus went to Jaroshlem?**
 
Why? Was she dull? or not concerned? or irreligious? What could be the cause of not understanding the mission of Jesus?

According to Quran, she was told all about the mission of Jesus even before she concieved him. Only she did not have to argue on behalf of Jesus to support him. That is also mentioned in the Quran (19:26)
The annunciation by the angel did NOT let the Virgin know EVERYTHING about Jesus’ mission. For instance, the prediction of Jesus’ passion was revealed to Mary when She encountered prophet Simeon in the temple forty days after Jesus’ nativity. Likewise, the Virgin and Joseph became familiar with Jesus’ amazing knowledge of the Law when Jesus was 12 years old.

The Koran does not claim that the annunciation enabled Virgin Mary to know EVERYTHING about Jesus’ mission either. For instance, the angel tells Mary NOTHING about Jesus’ future denial by Jews and their attemps to harm Him. Accordingly, Mary in the Koran seems to be absolutely unaware of Jesus’ supposed assumption to heaven and His relevant salvation from death.

Does this mean that the Koran defines Mary as a dull or irreligious person? 😉
She knew all about the mission of Jesus. Was she not with him when Jesus went to Jaroshlem?
The answer is YES according to the New Testament.

The answer is NO according to the Koran. (The Islamic scripture does not even imply that Mary was with Jesus when He went to Jerusalem).
 
All the wedding in Cana demonstrates is that Jesus had a mission on earth to do. It does not demonstrate that others including Mary understood that mission. If Mary understood that mission as the Messiah, she would not have gone along with her family to bring him home and stop his mission.
If you want to downplay Mary’s importance, this is a good scripture passage for you NOT to bring up. In the passage of the wedding at Cana, Jesus tells his mother that the Plan says that it isn’t time to start his public ministry. Mary’s response? CHANGE THE PLAN. And it happened, Jesus changed the plan and did as his mother wished. If Mary was not important, why does she have the ability to change His perfect, divine plan?
 
The annunciation by the angel did NOT let the Virgin know EVERYTHING about Jesus’ mission. For instance, the prediction of Jesus’ passion was revealed to Mary when She encountered prophet Simeon in the temple forty days after Jesus’ nativity. Likewise, the Virgin and Joseph became familiar with Jesus’ amazing knowledge of the Law when Jesus was 12 years old.

The Koran does not claim that the annunciation enabled Virgin Mary to know EVERYTHING about Jesus’ mission either. For instance, the angel tells Mary NOTHING about Jesus’ future denial by Jews and their attemps to harm Him. Accordingly, Mary in the Koran seems to be absolutely unaware of Jesus’ supposed assumption to heaven and His relevant salvation from death.

Does this mean that the Koran defines Mary as a dull or irreligious person? 😉

The answer is YES according to the New Testament.

The answer is NO according to the Koran. (The Islamic scripture does not even imply that Mary was with Jesus when He went to Jerusalem).
I am replying only to you last para above. I don’t know what bible says about it but the Quran is a high level language, brief in some way, and it is telling that Mary brought her son (Jesus ) before the people** mounted**. The people did not accept him and said that she had brought a strange (bad) thing to them. Please read the verse 19:27 again which I had posted earlier. See it again below:

[19:24] Then the angel called her from beneath her, saying, 'Grieve not. Thy Lord has placed a rivulet below thee;
[19:25] 'And shake towards thyself the trunk of the palm-tree; it will drop upon thee fresh ripe dates;
[19:26] 'So, eat and drink and cool thine eye. And if thou seest any man, say, ‘I have vowed a fast to the Gracious God; I will, therefore, not speak this day to any human being.’
[19:27] Then she brought him to her people, mounted. They said, 'O Mary, surely, thou hast committed a monstrous thing!
 
If you want to downplay Mary’s importance, this is a good scripture passage for you NOT to bring up. In the passage of the wedding at Cana, Jesus tells his mother that the Plan says that it isn’t time to start his public ministry. Mary’s response? CHANGE THE PLAN. And it happened, Jesus changed the plan and did as his mother wished. If Mary was not important, why does she have the ability to change His perfect, divine plan?
Perfect! As well, the verse on Simeon in Luke 2:34-34.
The Blessed Mother with Joseph presented their Beloved Son Jesus in the Temple like all parents for blessings. But Simeon knew who they were and that Jesus was the Massiah. He foretold the suffering Mary would endure, **“Behold, this Child is appointed for the fall and rising of many in Israel, and for a sign that is opposed (and a sword will pierce through your own soul also) so that thoughts from many hearts may be revealed.”
**
Imagine the pain and sorrows that the Blessed Mother must have felt hearing these words. She knew that her Son Jesus’s ministry would be opposed and she would suffer along with her Son greatly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top