I’m not here to accuse Catholics of worshiping Mary or the saints or anything. But since the Catholics don’t consider veneration to be worship, I was wondering where that ‘red line’ is. For example, if we were to put the Hail Holy Queen prayer side-by-side with the Lord’s Prayer, I don’t think the average Protestant would be able to tell the difference. So what kind of veneration does one need to show before veneration becomes worship?
You tell me. Do you think your parents are worthy of love, honor, and respect? You venerate them. You don’t worship them as your Lord and Creator, though.
OK, same with Mary and the saints. We venerate them as worthy of love, honor, and respect. But they are not worshiped as our Lord and Creator. Only God is our Lord and our Creator; only God is our Savior.
So really, please do tell me where in the Hail Holy Queen she is addressed as our Savior. Really read through the whole prayer. What is Mary asked to ‘do’? To save us? Uh-unh.
“Turn your eyes of mercy toward us and after this our exile. **show unto us the blessed fruit of thy womb, Jesus”.
**oh-kay. So who is doing any saving? Who is the ultimate ‘end’ of the prayer? To whom are all the prayers directed?
Yep. Jesus.
I’m sure you’ll be quick to tell me anecdotal evidence of somebody you know (probably somebody over age 50, for some reason we older people are usually targeted as the blind dupes of brainwashing) you ‘really thinks Mary is more important than Jesus’. Hey, if that person does so, it’s because they don’t understand their own faith enough (and that’s something that happens to protestants too, and we don’t go around saying that because Protestant A doesn’t follow a teaching, it means all protestants are wrong or invalidates the teaching itself).
Some protestants (anecdotally speaking) are so keyed into one aspect of God’s ‘written word’ that they have turned it into the ONLY thing that they accept. Some only will follow the ‘words in red’ because Jesus said THEM but not ‘anything else’. Some will only follow ‘social justice’ as defined by their pastor, or by their own ‘spirit-led thoughts’ and will ignore the rest of the Bible because ‘right now, those things aren’t important’ or 'THOSE concepts weren’t understood by the writers. They didn’t realize that COMMITTED gays are as worthy of ‘marriage’ as straights are. St Paul was a homophobe and JESUS never says anything against gays". . . etc.
But I’m not going to go around and say,
"Gee, you know, when does Protestant acceptance of a biblical teaching become ‘passe’ instead of being followed? If you look at Scripture, when did this teaching which was accepted for generations ‘cross the line’ into being ‘optional’ and finally into being completely rewritten, or completely ‘dumped?’
