A
Adam_Cook
Guest
So…I understand the teaching the church gives of co-habitation and I completely 100% agree with it, but. That being said I am at an odds within myself because of the fact that while I do not want to co-habitate, or live with, my girlfriend prior to marriage, I am faced with several dilemmas. My girlfriend has a history of panic attacks, severe panic attacks. She will panic and then pass out for hours until she regains consciousness and is then pretty lethargic due to the strain of the situation it takes on her. Usually afterward she is scared, so scared and when she is there that is where I want to be.
I love this girl, I want to be there for her and take care of her when something like this happens. Yet, as someone who is in formation to become a Secular Franciscan, I know that I am bound by obedience to the Church and to the teachings of the Church as the Holy Father Francis was, as Christ was to the Father. Yet is it acceptable for me to live with my girlfriend that I could take care of her, love her and be there for her when something like this happens? Currently we are 40 min apart and traveling down there is a lot of gas money so it constrains me from being able to be there for her. This aggravates me, it gets under my skin because even though she is in this state, I can do nothing for her but pray. I can’t physically hold her and tell her she is going to be ok, or help her prevent the attack in the first place. She has therapists that she goes to, but they couldn’t see her today nor this week.
I understand the church’s teaching, but this isn’t about sex or financial security, this is about the fact that I want to be there to take care of this beautiful women that God has given me, this daughter of his that he has entrusted into my hands and me into hers. So at what line does it become acceptable? Or does it never become acceptable even if the reason has behind it a corporeal work of mercy?
Pax.
I love this girl, I want to be there for her and take care of her when something like this happens. Yet, as someone who is in formation to become a Secular Franciscan, I know that I am bound by obedience to the Church and to the teachings of the Church as the Holy Father Francis was, as Christ was to the Father. Yet is it acceptable for me to live with my girlfriend that I could take care of her, love her and be there for her when something like this happens? Currently we are 40 min apart and traveling down there is a lot of gas money so it constrains me from being able to be there for her. This aggravates me, it gets under my skin because even though she is in this state, I can do nothing for her but pray. I can’t physically hold her and tell her she is going to be ok, or help her prevent the attack in the first place. She has therapists that she goes to, but they couldn’t see her today nor this week.
I understand the church’s teaching, but this isn’t about sex or financial security, this is about the fact that I want to be there to take care of this beautiful women that God has given me, this daughter of his that he has entrusted into my hands and me into hers. So at what line does it become acceptable? Or does it never become acceptable even if the reason has behind it a corporeal work of mercy?
Pax.