OK, but we’re on the side that believes: “But I say to you, whoever is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment, and whoever says to his brother, ‘Raqa,’ will be answerable to the Sanhedrin, and whoever says, ‘You fool,’ will be liable to fiery Gehenna” (Matt. 5:22) and “Be angry but do not sin; do not let the sun set on your anger, and do not leave room for the devil… And do not grieve the holy Spirit of God, with which you were sealed for the day of redemption. All bitterness, fury, anger, shouting, and reviling must be removed from you, along with all malice; be kind to one another, compassionate, forgiving one another as God has forgiven you in Christ.” (Eph 4:26,30-32)
And so on and so on… if you are only kind to those who are kind to you, well, the pagans do as much, be perfect as the Father is perfect who rains on the just and the unjust, and so on and so on…Allegra, I know you, you’re on the same page with me on all of that.
Having a reading space is not the same as being a full-fledged patron who can return books. Under no circumstances should children be left who will wander out of the space set aside for children “while their parents are looking for a book.” It was kind if the staff accepted books from her before with no issue, but that really ought to be seen as an unusual kindness by the staff, not as something that parents are entitled to expect from a college library.
You’re right that “idiot” is not right. We’re not teaching our children to call people names when they are bad at their jobs. It is kind of like how we had to learn to say “THAT MAN WAS NOT SAFE!!” when we get cut off in traffic instead of using that other kind of language we don’t want our children to learn. “Idiot” is of course a way of referring to other people that we don’t want our children to learn. Our Lord said that quite plainly.
You’re already saying that; I’m saying that it doesn’t harm a six-year old to refer to someone who lacks manners as someone who lacks understanding about how to act. Unless you think that the person really is actively looking for ways to be bad at his job and to traumatize small children, it is OK to call it a misunderstanding. You can gamble on saying he didn’t understand that very young people are tender-hearted and need to be treated with particularly kind manners. We’ve committed harm to others out of carelessness or thoughtlessness ourselves, after all. The measure we’d like to have measured out to us is the one we ought to teach our little children to measure with. So, yeah, maybe calling it a misunderstanding is an unbelievable mercy… so tell your child that some day you are hoping for some unbelievable mercy, too, especially for the stuff you didn’t even get was “that wrong.”