Where did the Church's contraceptives stance come from?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 31crystal
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
3

31crystal

Guest
Does anyone know the details on how the Catholic church became so opposed to birth control of any kind? I’ve heard the general explanation but would like to know how the Church got there. I have noticed that the Catholic church is very, very rigid on its stance, and that families that are the most faithful to the Church in this regard are often put in terrible moral positions. Faithful women are most hurt by it in particular. :confused:I feel really bad for women who get into bad health situations (mental with PPD or the many physical conditions) because of this who are met with very textbook “NFP or abstain” responses. Sure, there are women who have had good experiences with it, and I myself use NFP because I don’t want to go on hormones/my husband has a very low drive. I can see this being a serious source of heartache in marriages, even if the two parties get all the “mystical rewards” that are supposed to come with the Catholic life. Makes me sad.

So I want to know specifically where it came from.
 
Does anyone know the details on how the Catholic church became so opposed to birth control of any kind? I’ve heard the general explanation but would like to know how the Church got there. I have noticed that the Catholic church is very, very rigid on its stance, and that families that are the most faithful to the Church in this regard are often put in terrible moral positions. Faithful women are most hurt by it in particular. :confused:I feel really bad for women who get into bad health situations (mental with PPD or the many physical conditions) because of this who are met with very textbook “NFP or abstain” responses. Sure, there are women who have had good experiences with it, and I myself use NFP because I don’t want to go on hormones/my husband has a very low drive. I can see this being a serious source of heartache in marriages, even if the two parties get all the “mystical rewards” that are supposed to come with the Catholic life. Makes me sad.

So I want to know specifically where it came from.
The Catholic Church didn’t ‘become’ opposed to Birth Control. All Christian denominations have always regarded it as a sin until the influence of feminism and the eugenics movement made itself felt in the early 20th century.

The Catholic Church has in fact also weakened its opposition by endorsing and now very much encouraging NFP and frankly turning a blind eye to widespread contraceptive use among members.
 
Does anyone know the details on how the Catholic church became so opposed to birth control of any kind? I’ve heard the general explanation but would like to know how the Church got there. I have noticed that the Catholic church is very, very rigid on its stance, and that families that are the most faithful to the Church in this regard are often put in terrible moral positions. Faithful women are most hurt by it in particular. :confused:I feel really bad for women who get into bad health situations (mental with PPD or the many physical conditions) because of this who are met with very textbook “NFP or abstain” responses. Sure, there are women who have had good experiences with it, and I myself use NFP because I don’t want to go on hormones/my husband has a very low drive. I can see this being a serious source of heartache in marriages, even if the two parties get all the “mystical rewards” that are supposed to come with the Catholic life. Makes me sad.

So I want to know specifically where it came from.
Uh, God.
And actually, it is not that the Catholic Church ‘became opposed to birth control.’. Once upon a time --and not that long ago–the mainstream Protestant Churches stood right in line with Catholic teaching.

It was not until the Lambeth Conference of 1930 that the Anglican (here in U.S. Episcopal) church first permitted, under grave circumstances, and for married couples only, careful and ‘rare’ use of contraceptives. Once that edifice crumbled, pretty soon the other churches followed suit.

You’ll hear arguments that ‘throughout history’ there may have been lip service to the "sin of Onan’ argument but that everybody including ‘the Catholic Church’ did a nudge wink. Well, contraceptives themselves were not all that, um, ‘available’ or varied. The ‘sheath’ was an early condom and contributed to the spread of such lovely diseases as syphilis (for which there was little treatment until the 20th century, and which wound up making men, and the women they infected, die some pretty hideous deaths.)
Abortifacient ‘natural remedies’ were a hazard --in order to ingest enough to ‘expel the fetus’ there were usually some pretty fair dangers to the mothers.

The whole contraceptive mentality though is an attempt to ‘ret-con’ history. ZPG types aside, the family unit, and plenty of children, seen as a gift from God, was the norm of true civilization and protected most by Catholic Christians (who have kept this up even now after the slide of their Protestant brothers).

Instead of bewailing the mothers ‘punished with a baby’ (and yes, the stories are heartbreaking), how about going after the society-sanctioned hedonism and the tangled policies of economics that make this possible? How about giving men and women real incentives to marry, instead of making it cheaper NOT to keep her by penalizing taxes, welfare that doesn’t work, and the adversarial “Women don’t need men” brainwashing fed our daughters along with the "they don’t need us, so ‘screw em’’ attitude brainwashing fed to our sons in return. How about encouraging living wages so that families can actually stay together and work together, instead of having all mom’s "need to fulfill myself’ salary (which 90% of the time turns into a “single mom because he dumped me since I could take care of myself” salary) go to paying underpaid, overworked, burnt out child care workers and legal fees for fat cat lawyers who feed on getting ‘the most’ (for them) out of divorce cases?

Thank GOD the Catholic Church is still fighting for true marriage and all it entails, and for the true dignity of men and women, and the gifts of children. And that includes, in marriage, being open to the uniative AND procreative aspects of one of the greatest gifts, sex.
 
Tantum ergo–It’s okay to “bewail” or be sad for those women. It’s okay to allow their stories to make one take a second glance at why the stance is so strict. I can do all that while still acknowledging the things that you mentioned. As I grow older, I find it easier to grieve for those who end up without a voice for whatever reason.
 
Does anyone know the details on how the Catholic church became so opposed to birth control of any kind?
It is not the Church that has become opposed to contraception, it is the non-Catholic Churches that have moved away from the historic moral position of Christianity. Contraception has always been moral evil, a sin against the sixth commandment. And that only happened in 1930. Prior to that Christianity was unanimous in its rejection of contraception.

I can recommend the book The Bible and Birth Control by Charles Provan (a Protestant look at the issue of contraception).
that families that are the most faithful to the Church in this regard are often put in terrible moral positions. Faithful women are most hurt by it in particular. :confused:
I am not sure what you have been reading, but it sounds like propaganda to me.

In many areas of our lives sacrifice and following God’s law can be difficult. This is no different. But God’s law never leads us astray and only leads us to salvation.
 
It is not the Church that has become opposed to contraception, it is the non-Catholic Churches that have moved away from the historic moral position of Christianity. Contraception has always been moral evil, a sin against the sixth commandment. And that only happened in 1930. Prior to that Christianity was unanimous in its rejection of contraception.
👍

The sentence ‘became so opposed to birth control’ is so inaccurate.
 
I have noticed that the Catholic church is very, very rigid on its stance,
umm… The church teaches that sin is wrong. How can it change its stance on any sin :confused:
and that families that are the most faithful to the Church in this regard are often put in terrible moral positions.
:confused: huh? can you please expalin what these moral positions are??? Following the church teachings is the best things anyone could do
Faithful women are most hurt by it in particular. :confused:
Again, please explaning what is meant by this since I have no idea
I feel really bad for women who get into bad health situations (mental with PPD or the many physical conditions) because of this who are met with very textbook “NFP or abstain” responses.
So in according to this logic, if I feel very bad for poor people who can’t afford healthy food and suitable living conditions I should ask the church to reconsider its stance on stealing and advocate that in some circumstances robbing a bank is ok 🤷
I myself use NFP because I don’t want to go on hormones
Isn’t the secular argument that hormones are bad making a wave of non-practicing Catholics wish to use NFP proof that Jesus always knew what He was talking about?
I can see this being a serious source of heartache in marriages, even if the two parties get all the “mystical rewards” that are supposed to come with the Catholic life. Makes me sad.
News Flash: We live in a fallen world and life can be a source of heartache for both married and unmarried people
 
I think y’all should have a glance at the Didache, it is the earliest Christian document outside of the New Testament, it was written in between the 60s and 90s ad. Artificial contraceptives were not accepted by Mainline Protestant denominations until 1930 in fact the only denomination I know of that still says contraceptives are sinful are the Amish and they’re not even a single denomination
 
1ke–thank you for giving me the resource to check out!

Obviously the birth control issue is a big deal to those that follow the Catholic faith as evidenced by some of the responses on here. I have been listening to Catholic radio and maybe should have expected the strong responses more based on what I had heard!

I understand that many forms of birth control represent new technology, so it would make sense that humanity at large in addition to the Church would have taken stronger stances on it in the last century or so. The newness of accepting birth control publically makes sense in light of better technology. NFP is a fairly new system, too, perhaps developed in response to the other forms. It was developed by Catholics, right, then spread to people who prefer natural forms of birth control?

I grew up in San Antonio, TX, which was founded by Catholic missionaries. Needless to say, it has a very old presence in the town, and there is a large population of Catholics. Many of them use birth control and have only 2-3 kids. They share that they are “done” having kids. These are people who are active and satisfied in their parishes, not only the (many) nominal Catholics I meet. I have met exactly one Catholic woman in my time as an adult there who is taking kids “as God gives her.” Most families I meet like that are Mormon.

My question: I understand this is a question that can be answered speculatively and has limitations. Please do not be mean in answering. I’m looking to get a Catholic perspective on what I’ve seen from outside, not trying to get at anyone. So, if God made up the strict rejection of all forms of birth control and having large families is a blessing/favorable, etc., why is it that many faithful and practicing Catholics who love God and their Church find it to not be so? If they did, they would do it.
 
…I grew up in San Antonio, TX, which was founded by Catholic missionaries. Needless to say, it has a very old presence in the town, and there is a large population of Catholics. Many of them use birth control and have only 2-3 kids. They share that they are “done” having kids. These are people who are active and satisfied in their parishes, not only the (many) nominal Catholics I meet. I have met exactly one Catholic woman in my time as an adult there who is taking kids “as God gives her.” Most families I meet like that are Mormon.

My question: I understand this is a question that can be answered speculatively and has limitations. Please do not be mean in answering. I’m looking to get a Catholic perspective on what I’ve seen from outside, not trying to get at anyone. So, if God made up the strict rejection of all forms of birth control and having large families is a blessing/favorable, etc., why is it that many faithful and practicing Catholics who love God and their Church find it to not be so? If they did, they would do it.
You are correct that many/most Christians, including many Catholics, in the West have rejected the Christian ideal of children as a blessing from God. As a result Europe and the US would have declining populations if not for mass immigration.

Does this mean that the original prolife Christian teaching was in error? Or is the modernist anti-child idea in error?
 
1ke–thank you for giving me the resource to check out!

Obviously the birth control issue is a big deal to those that follow the Catholic faith as evidenced by some of the responses on here. I have been listening to Catholic radio and maybe should have expected the strong responses more based on what I had heard!

I understand that many forms of birth control represent new technology, so it would make sense that humanity at large in addition to the Church would have taken stronger stances on it in the last century or so. The newness of accepting birth control publically makes sense in light of better technology. NFP is a fairly new system, too, perhaps developed in response to the other forms. It was developed by Catholics, right, then spread to people who prefer natural forms of birth control?

I grew up in San Antonio, TX, which was founded by Catholic missionaries. Needless to say, it has a very old presence in the town, and there is a large population of Catholics. Many of them use birth control and have only 2-3 kids. They share that they are “done” having kids. These are people who are active and satisfied in their parishes, not only the (many) nominal Catholics I meet. I have met exactly one Catholic woman in my time as an adult there who is taking kids “as God gives her.” Most families I meet like that are Mormon.

My question: I understand this is a question that can be answered speculatively and has limitations. Please do not be mean in answering. I’m looking to get a Catholic perspective on what I’ve seen from outside, not trying to get at anyone. So, if God made up the strict rejection of all forms of birth control and having large families is a blessing/favorable, etc., why is it that many faithful and practicing Catholics who love God and their Church find it to not be so? If they did, they would do it.
Why do people sin?

God gave all kinds of rules, and every single one of us breaks them, often claiming good reason, and that “if God understood how hard it was, He’d be OK with it.”

But we as Christians do not simply inhabit the world of San Antonio (or the US, or the earth) in AD2016.

The question should not be (with respect), “If God’s teaching is right, why do so many Catholics reject it? If it were really right, they’d do it”. That’s not even really a logical syllogism (at least I don’t think so. Logic was never my strongest subject). Because God tells us to love our neighbor, and we SAY it’s right, but we don’t do it. So it can’t be our ‘doing it’ that makes it right, and thus makes God right. Things have to be right if they are of God, even if everybody says they are wrong, and things have to be wrong if God says they are wrong even if everybody says they are right, because God is Truth.

So, if God is saying this (and He is. We have everything from the Bible to the Didache to uninterrupted Catholic teaching AND the entire history of the world up until about 1930) is right, then even if the nicest people you know are rejecting it, then it doesn’t mean the teaching is wrong. It means (again, with respect), that the PEOPLE are wrong. That even if they get a lot of other teachings ‘right’, that is not what makes the teachings right themselves, that the people do them. The teachings are right even if nobody does them, or claims they are wrong. We have seen this throughout history. The Jews were a 'stiff necked people". So are we. We want very much to think that our saintly Auntie Claire, who volunteers at Planned Parenthood along with working in the Soup Kitchen, singing in the choir, sitting on the parish council, and who has helped us in thousands of ways, MUST be right in rejecting the Church’s teaching on contraception, because she is so nice, and because she accepts so many other teachings. But Auntie Claire, admirable Christian that she is, kind, decent, and loving, is wrong if she rejects the Church’s (which is God’s, and which until within the memory of some of our grandparents today was still ‘the Christian churches’) teachings on contraception.

You can be a very kind, decent, loving person and still misunderstand, make mistakes, etc. That doesn’t make you then unkind, rotten, and evil. It makes you a kind, decent, loving person who misunderstood something, and who has the choice to, when shown the error, correct the misunderstanding (I am using the ‘generic’ you, as an example. I am not saying you crystal personally here).

But as Kim Possible would say, “That’s the sitch.”
 
Ha! Thanks for the Kim Possible reference! And that general argument makes a lot of sense.
 
Contraception is not new and neither is the rhythm of the cycle. Augustine wrote on the topic in the 4th ceuntury.

the desire to frustrate the marital act in opposition to God’s plan for sexuality is not a new phenomenon nor based on technology advances.
 
My question: I understand this is a question that can be answered speculatively and has limitations. Please do not be mean in answering. I’m looking to get a Catholic perspective on what I’ve seen from outside, not trying to get at anyone. So, if God made up the strict rejection of all forms of birth control and having large families is a blessing/favorable, etc., why is it that many faithful and practicing Catholics who love God and their Church find it to not be so? If they did, they would do it.
No, your question does not have limitations. People will twist the truth to accommodate their agendas but it does not change the real answer. As much as you don’t want people to be mean, perhaps you should be more charitable on how you word your questions.

As a practicing Catholic who loves God more than anything in the world, it is quite insulting to be asked a question on only one aspect of the faith with the insinuation the teaching is somehow flawed.

And what you see from the outside is exactly that ie THE OUTSIDE. God knows our hearts and He alone judges what is inside them. The whole point of Catholism is to become closer to God. To accomplish that, one must follow His commandments. And all of His commandments have been broken by Catholics, but it does not take away from God’s wisdom.

So in a nutshell, using contraceptives distances a person from God and it is illogical for the church to encourage that
 
Does this mean that the original prolife Christian teaching was in error? Or is the modernist anti-child idea in error?
Hmmm…interesting question. Myself, I would be considered “very pro life” compared to the average person. Even so, I have a hard time calling people who condone most forms of contraception “anti-child.” That speaks to a small, extremist section of people who believe in birth control, and I cannot speak for them. The pro life, pro birth control people that I know don’t agree with them. These birth control users are, in fact, pro child. They have families. They foster and adopt children. They mentor, sponsor through donations, provide volunteer service hours for, and “stand in the gap” for children daily. No, they are not “anti-child” just because they limit their number of children. That part doesn’t really make sense. If anything, it can come off as a little bit selfish to have so many of one’s own children that one cannot help those less fortunate. Even if you raise your kids to be good and care for others, they will have so many kids themselves that it can interfere with charity.

While it is no secret that the world in general was a harsher place in times past, the acknowledgement of the hardship of large families (because it is hard, expensive, resource hungry and taxing to have a lot of kids–and they don’t always thrive being part of a gaggle, either) has opened the door to offer mercy to those who have suffered in or because of one. In the fundamentalist Protestant communities, families that have a lot of children sometimes struggle with food or clothing insecurity, children can be victims of abuse without their tired parents noticing, and mothers can be so spent with constant pregnancies and nursing that the care of their children falls upon, well, the older children. These issues are because of family size, not a lack of Catholic inspiration. As stated, not using birth control is nothing new, so these issues can be found in other populations. They are probably in Catholic families, too.

It strikes me as odd that a hand that can be extended as mercy to families that are overwhelmed or women who become ill (mentally or physically) or injured due to childbirth is not extended by the Church but by people the Church calls evil. Not even one little inch, one little ray of hope for people in truly bad situations, and ones where NFP won’t work (I do NFP, I know how it works). It wouldn’t have to be full acceptance, just something that would allow for those who are serious situations to clear their moral conscience and maintain emotionally fulfilling marriages (which God values). This is the kind of thing that gets me confused and, honestly, has been a barrier to my considering conversion. That’s why I asked about it to begin with.
 
You are correct that many/most Christians, including **many Catholics, in the West have rejected the Christian ideal of children as a blessing from God. As a result Europe and the US would have declining populations if not for mass immigration. **

Does this mean that the original prolife Christian teaching was in error? Or is the modernist anti-child idea in error?
First part of bolded

That is not true, the anti child aspect I mean. Limiting for good reasons is not anti child surely. A child a year is what we still see in Ireland often enough
 
As a practicing Catholic who loves God more than anything in the world, it is quite insulting to be asked a question on only one aspect of the faith with the insinuation the teaching is somehow flawed.
Sorry you did not like my question. Honestly, I did not come on this forum to insult anyone. I came on this forum to ask about why Catholics don’t like birth control. When I worded it as “where did that come from?” many responses have been quite belittling, actually, as in I should have known it was there all along. I’m not Catholic and did not know. That’s what I wanted to know. Now I’m not as excited to know. I’ve been looking in to the Catholic faith for a few years, and this is one of a couple of sticking points that I wanted to work through. As you can tell from my original post, the implications of the issue actually makes me sad. I had thought that this online forum was supposed to be a place to work through questions like that. It seems like this particular thread has a combination of Catholics looking to get regular questions answered (totally reasonable) and people who might want to discuss things with someone who is on the outside but is curious about the inside. Are you interested in people who are curious about the Catholic faith converting or remaining on the OUTSIDE? I’ve heard about “the new evangelism” that is supposedly going through the Catholic church right now. Perhaps I could be a part of that, you really don’t know. Myself, I already do NFP because I don’t like hormonal birth control. Just having a truly hard time with the total rigidity of the stance. This is a fair and valid concern, and it is one that practicing Catholics will need to address if they are to grow their Church through converts or, as they say, have people from other Christian sects, “come home to Rome.”

Since a few of the responses on here have been defensive, I have to ask: Is having a large family looked down upon sometimes by other members in one’s parish? Is the decision to not use birth control something that people feel the need to constantly defend even among other Catholics? Does this topic touch a huge nerve?
 
I think y’all should have a glance at the Didache, it is the earliest Christian document outside of the New Testament, it was written in between the 60s and 90s ad. Artificial contraceptives were not accepted by Mainline Protestant denominations until 1930 in fact the only denomination I know of that still says contraceptives are sinful are the Amish and they’re not even a single denomination
Thank you for this resource! I have been asking around for things like that to read. Since I am not Catholic and actually wanted to know about this issue, I really appreciate those of you who are not belittling and are helping to send me in a good direction. For instance, I had no idea that all churches did not condone it until the 1930s.
 
I came on this forum to ask about why Catholics don’t like birth control.
It’s not about what Catholics like or don’t like. It’s about God’s moral law. We can’t change it. The Church proclaims it, that is all.
Is having a large family looked down upon sometimes by other members in one’s parish? Is the decision to not use birth control something that people feel the need to constantly defend even among other Catholics? Does this topic touch a huge nerve?
I’ve been Catholic for 25 years and no one has ever asked me to defend anything on this topic (IRL, not on here of course). I have neither had to defend my non use, nor would I ever.

It doesn’t really matter what other people think anyway. People judge other people for all sorts of reasons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top