Where did YOU get your authority?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrianH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just a thought to inject while so many are speaking of a book ~ the Bible ~ and not to take away from that but to ADD

The WORD of God is also a Person ~ His name is Jesus Christ

Very often in Scripture the WORD is referred to in some way. I wanted to affirm that everyone that makes the same reference also affirms that the WORD of God is Jesus.
I’ll say AMEN to that!

Peace>>>AJ
 
Who are we to decide who, when, where and why God chooses to reach us?
You’re right. We are not to decide. And we didn’t decide. It was God who chose how to reach us. I would suggest, AJ, in all charity, that you often fall into the anti-Catholic trap. Not that you are anti-Catholic - I can discern that you are not. But the trap insists to all its victims that the Catholic Church is man-made.

It is not.

It is Christ-made. And until people can come to terms with that, no other issue is arguable. Because if you see “church” only as an invisible body of believers, and refuse to look at biblical (OT and NT) proof, and historical proof that it was always intended by Christ to be visible, and have visible leadership, and be sacramental, and liturgical, and be the earthly shepherd of His flock, then we will always end up at a stand-still.

Another reason I see you are trapped in the realm of anti-Catholic rhetoric, AJ, is because you insist on showing Catholics that it’s all about a personal relationship with Christ. That’s like telling someone “staying alive is all about breathing”. It’s an unnecessary assertion. It is so automatic in us, that it’s often humorous for us to hear someone implore us to get to know Christ. And when I refer to Catholics, AJ, I do mean the faithful, knowledgable Catholics - not lukewarm cafeteria Catholics who do not know their faith (there are plenty of those, as there are likewise outside the Church).

God Bless
 
As always, Steve your very kind.

The problem that I see in both Catholics and Protestants is the determination of making their institutional beliefs the only vehicles by which God can work.

I will give you an example of what I mean.

Most protestant beliefs adamantly require that a person make a public confession of faith in Jesus Christ or else be forever condemned to hell.
Looking at Catholics from that perspective is saying that all Catholics are not going to make it because they do not as protestants do, is make a public profession of faith in Jesus Chris alone, not in Mary and not in the Pope.
The same is looked upon Mormons, JW’s, Seventh day Adventist, Muslims and Jews.

The Catholic perspective is that unless we belong to the rightful church all others are lost.

You see where I am coming from?

My problem was, once as a Catholic, I felt close to God, an as a protestant, I still feel close o God.

My question to me was “why is there no difference” in my feelings towards God as a Catholic or a Protestant?

The answer was in long time coming as I am now 62 years old with allot of life’s observations, experience and study in the word.

I was not content with either the Catholic logic or Protestant logic and had to look else where to find my answers.

If I looked at the Catholic logic, the Church was the means of salvation.
If I looked at the Protestant logic, public profession of faith in Jesus was the only way.

My dilemma was in justifying the rest of the world who did not fit either of the two category presented.

There were no answers forth coming from either side other than either their way or the highway.

So I searched and searched and looked into many of the occult beliefs looking for a common thread that would satisfy my yearnings as I was vexed in spirit, unsettled until I did find the answers.

It all came down to me and in which was in front of me all the time but could not see it for the clouds of doctrines of man.

It was love period.

There is human kind of love and than there’s Godly kind of love and unless we are given knowledge of the Godly kind, it won’t matter what religious beliefs we would espouse, it would all be in vain.

Christ paid the price for all human souls whether they acknowledge Him or not.
If we do, we are blessed, if we don’t we remain in the former state (condemned)until either we do or we die, and after that, our soul belongs to Him who purchased it.

In that, I see the common thread that can unite all our differences and make of many one, of one spirit, and that one only is in brotherhood of Jesus.

Mar 3:35 For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.

And the will of God is not this church or that church but:Jhn 13:35 By this shall all [men] know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.

Love requires nothing but gives everything.
"Love never controls; it doesn’t claim this is “yours” and this is “mine” but says, “all is yours”…the Gospel of Philip by Alan Jacobs.

Friends, if Godly love can not unite us with the one God, than nothing else will.

Pace>>>AJ
 
It all came down to me and in which was in front of me all the time but could not see it for the clouds of doctrines of man.

It was love period.

In that, I see the common thread that can unite all our differences and make of many one, of one spirit, and that one only is in brotherhood of Jesus.

Love requires nothing but gives everything.
"Love never controls; it doesn’t claim this is “yours” and this is “mine” but says, “all is yours”…the Gospel of Philip by Alan Jacobs.

Friends, if Godly love can not unite us with the one God, than nothing else will.

Pace>>>AJ
Excellently said.

Christ’s prayer “that they may be one” still rings in everyone’s ear.

Let us also pray that those who split from the Catholic Church on account of abuses and human faults during their times may also find the realization that love conquers all, including abuses, faults, schisms and hardened hearts.
 
For the most part of it Yes!

Peace>>>AJ
I hope you realize what you are saying.
because what you are really saying is this: it is not God’s way it is my way. the secular and modernist mindset.

it does not make any sense for you to be using Sacred Scripture. it was written long ago.

**
Pray for the Church throughout the world. Pray for our Catholics priests and lay people who are being persecuted in many places.**
 
Umm…you also said “lest you die in your sins”.

That is a judgement against the eternal soul.

Again, repeating myself, none who have responded to you have either pretended to judge the thoughts and intention of your heart, nor have pretended to judge your eternal destiny.

They are only objectively judging the objective act of you a human condemning someone whom you don’t even know based on statements that can easily be misunderstood.

I could have a separate conversation with Catholics if I want to on their view of Scripture. And I would repeat all of the same points I have argued in the past. Around and around in the same circles. I will pass on that, thank you very much.

What I will not do however is condemn people who disagree with me to eternal flames.

The last time I checked the Bible, the one requirement for eternal life is “Believe on Jesus” (John 3;16 and several other simple gospel verses throughout the NT that I learned 2 months into being a Christian).

I suspect that if I asked the original poster whether she believed on Jesus per John 3:16 she would say yes. Now granted if she says no, then we have a problem, but I suspect anyway she would say yes.

Now assuming that is the case, who am I to say that the promises in God’s word of eternal life do not apply to her because we disagree on a point of theology.
As you mature as a Christian, you will know exactly what I am saying…I’m sorry this is a stumbling block for you…please forgive.
I pray you understand all that it entails “to believe in Jesus”; you do not want to be a victim of easy believism. What happens to a person who doesn’t posses Christ? They die in their sins…right?
 
AJ,

Your posts are a joy to read, filled with a certain wisdom that comes with obvious experience. I would want to respond to you in this way…

Although The Catholic Church properly claims to possess the fullness of The Truth, which is the essence of Jesus Christ Himself, it does this not of its own accord, but in concert with the proclamations of Christ Himself. The Church also does not claim to be the only vehicle by which God works. Indeed, She states that the Holy Spirit, although linked to The Church from the beginning, absolutely and impartially works outside of Her in the lives of all the faithful. But His purpose is to draw all peoples into the bosom of Christ’s Church, which is to say, to draw all peoples unto The Truth.

Catholics, by the way, do not make a profession of faith to Mary, nor the Pope. Our profession of faith is to Christ, and it IS in fact, public, as we profess the Nicene Creed atleast weekly at Sunday Mass. I know you remember this from your past. But we, of course, don’t do this because of protestant conformities, which are a mere 500 years old. The Creed is nearly as old as The Church Herself.

I’m glad you feel as close to God as you ever did, regardless of your church, AJ. You speculated as to why there was no difference, and although I don’t know you, nor your heart, might I be so bold as to offer a possibility…and that is that perhaps your past Catholic faith was experienced under poor catechesis? Which is no insult to you by any stretch. Tragically, many leave the Church for just that reason - the failures of men/women to properly pass on the true teachings of The Church. Without proper catechesis, many fall away, because to the uncatechized eye, The Church can indeed look like what many misinformed anti-Catholics describe it to be. This is just speculation on my part, AJ. I offer it due to the obvious stance you have that The Church is man-made, among other subtleties in your posts which suggest you perhaps do not have proper understanding of what exactly The Church teaches.

But you’re absolutely right, we are all called to a Godly love in our lives, and this does indeed guide us. Catholics would say to you, AJ, that they would pray that someday it leads you back home to Mother Church, who longs for the return of all those who are seeking or who are lost.

God Bless
 
The turn this conversation has taken has reminded me of something I once heard distinguishing Catholics from other Christians. While I mean no disrespect, as all Christians have some portion of the truth, I cannot help but to regret what some are missing.

So many claim to talk about Jesus or to read about Him. We COMMUNE with Him ~ Body, Blood, Soul & Divinity ~ every Sunday, or even more frequently if we are lucky.

Everyone that reads about Jesus, or talks about Him, is welcome to do so, that’s GREAT! But you’re missing out on the fullness of the WORD of God when you skip the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Because in the end, Jesus didn’t come to write a book. He, Himself, is the WORD of God and it is He who, in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, assimilates us, His Church, into Him. (It’s not the other way around!) Those that stay away from the Mass Jesus commanded do not experience this fullness.
 
As you mature as a Christian, you will know exactly what I am saying…I’m sorry this is a stumbling block for you…please forgive.
I pray you understand all that it entails “to believe in Jesus”; you do not want to be a victim of easy believism. What happens to a person who doesn’t posses Christ? They die in their sins…right?
I am perfectly aware that according to the Bible not everyone who says “Lord, Lord” shall enter the kingdom of heaven (Matthew 7:21).

However, again, I do not know the hearts and minds of anyone who says “Lord, Lord”. Only the Lord Jesus Christ does.

The only knowledge I have on anyone is what they say and what they do. And even this knowledge is incomplete and fallible, particularly when the only medium for this knowledge is the internet.

So without perfect knowledge, including the knowledge of the heart and mind, how can I be absolutely certain that anybody who professes Christ with their lips is indeed not a Christian and instead going to hell.

The answer is that I can not be absolutely certain. Neither can you.

Therefore, since nobody has absolute certainty, this judgement is not ours to make. It is left up to the One who has perfect knowledge and perfect certainty.
 
The turn this conversation has taken has reminded me of something I once heard distinguishing Catholics from other Christians. While I mean no disrespect, as all Christians have some portion of the truth, I cannot help but to regret what some are missing.

So many claim to talk about Jesus or to read about Him. We COMMUNE with Him ~ Body, Blood, Soul & Divinity ~ every Sunday, or even more frequently if we are lucky.

Everyone that reads about Jesus, or talks about Him, is welcome to do so, that’s GREAT! But you’re missing out on the fullness of the WORD of God when you skip the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. Because in the end, Jesus didn’t come to write a book. He, Himself, is the WORD of God and it is He who, in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, assimilates us, His Church, into Him. (It’s not the other way around!) Those that stay away from the Mass Jesus commanded do not experience this fullness.
Deceit
 
All agreed, Steve, and Amen! But if we accept the same view of salvation through the Gospel of Christ, is it somehow less true if it comes to us from outside the RCC? John 3:16 says “whosoever believes”. Does that not include me, a non-Catholic? Is God’s grace not also sufficient for me?
Sorry, I missed your follow-up question here.

God’s grace is, of course, sufficient for you. Placing yourself outside of His Church, however, can make it more difficult for you to receive and respond to this grace. And that is because grace is primarily (but not exclusively) imparted to Christians sacramentally, which is to say, through the sacraments of The Church (i.e. baptism, reconciliation, the Eucharist). The fact that you have this separation from the primary reception of God’s Grace does not necessarily impact your salvation, but it could. The Church, again, makes no absolute statement regarding the salvation of any individual soul (save for the canonization of the Saints - another thread). But she does proclaim that salvation, which is made possible through Christ, works in the lives of the faithful through the instrument of His Church, even those who separate themselves from Her. Here’s the way The Church puts it, in the Catechism…

*CCC 819 “Furthermore, many elements of sanctification and of truth” are found outside the visible confines of the Catholic Church: “the written Word of God; the life of grace; faith, hope, and charity, with the other interior gifts of the Holy Spirit, as well as visible elements.” Christ’s Spirit uses these Churches and ecclesial communities as means of salvation, whose power derives from the fullness of grace and truth that Christ has entrusted to the Catholic Church. All these blessings come from Christ and lead to him, and are in themselves calls to “Catholic unity.” *

God Bless
 
“Truth is not a someTHING it is a someBODY. His name is Jesus Christ. When Truth is called a lie, the lights go out, darkness comes…” Fr. John Corapi

It is unfortunate, noncatholic, if Truth bothers you. However, you have absolutely no grounds to call me, or anyone, names, and, indeed, that would be unChristian. And to call the WORD of God, who is Jesus “deceit” is utterly beyond the pale.

You may not call Truth a Lie in this forum. At least you cannot do it without being called out. You have ducked many instances of being called out on one thing or another, but to call Jesus Christ, who is the TRUTH, to call Him a lie, or a a deceit, is going too far.

I submit it is time for you to find another way to pass your time.
 
Try not to get too worked up over NonCatholic.

If he knew the Truth, I feel he would never call it deceit. His type of non-Catholic apologetics is quite abrupt and argumentative, I know. He does indeed seem to have quite an anti-Catholic agenda. These are difficult people to have logical discussions with, as they seem to be dominated by anger over The Church, and are rigid in their misunderstanding.

Appeared to me that he was accusing you of deceiving others (which of course, you weren’t) as opposed to calling Jesus a lie.

Just an observation.

God Bless
 
As you mature as a Christian, you will know exactly what I am saying…I’m sorry this is a stumbling block for you…please forgive.
I pray you understand all that it entails “to believe in Jesus”; you do not want to be a victim of easy believism. What happens to a person who doesn’t posses Christ? They die in their sins…right?
Even better - you’re saying I don’t possess Christ now?
 
**It doesn’t clarify. Unfortunately, as in **all Protestantism – all it does is muddle the issue.
**As for my comments on condemnation, I was confused by your **seemingly contradictory claim that:
“By the way, we can pronounce judgment on someone that we give the gospel to and if they reject it…” You have not read all posts and you left out bound in your sins or … You have taken it out of context and you know it.
I guess with further review, I may have come to a different conclusion.
**Anyway – as for your other comments that you pasted from the **www.gracebiblefellowship-tx.org/Sermons website, Matt. 16:19 was directed at Peter only when Jesus told him that his Church would be built on him.

**Later, in **Matt. 18:18, I notice that you didn’t include the passage in context. He was speaking to the authority of the Church as an entity – **There were the Apostles and disciples there - hello! If you gave someone the gospel message and they reject it, then what would Heaven conclude and wouldn’t you conclude the same thing at that point of time? Yes!, if they accepted, then you would conclude the positive, just as Heaven would. Here is the full context of Matt 18 "Matthew 18:15-20 -
15 "If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother. 16 "But if he does not listen {to you,} take one or two more with you, so that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every fact may be confirmed . 17 "If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. 18 "Truly I say to you, whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed in heaven. 19 "Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them by My Father who is in heaven. 20 “For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst.” ** not each individual within the Church (“if he refuses to listen even to the Church”).
**Jesus’ Church **has a hierarchy - a structure - a leadership. To deny that is to deny passages such as 2 Thess. 3:6, 1 Cor. 11:2, and 2 Thess. 2:15

**The church has the authority – **not the individuals that make it up. This is not what was taught in Scripture – this is not what was taught by the Apostles – this is not what was taught by the Early Church Fathers.

**This is a **fallacy that began to be taught over 1500 years after Jesus’ Ascension into heaven. They began to teach that faith was all that was necessary instead of obedience of faith. In doing this, you overlook (1 Corinthians 13:1-2, 13).
**In these verses, St. Paul is expounding on the 3 major virtues, faith, hope and love. **Which does he say is the greatest? Faith? Nope – he says LOVE is Why? Because love is the all-encompassing virtue that IS the obedience of faith. Without it – you cannot have true faith.

ALL Scripture must be taken in context I agree 100% . Without it, all you get is the tragedy that is the thousand’s of bickering denominations that is Protestantism.Don’t know about that, I’m a Chrisitian and belong to the unified body of Christ.
The church is made up of individuals unless you are RC?
 
I think the easiest way to explain is this. When you are RC you believe the Pope has the authority and the Apostles just like the beginning. The best way to say it is this, Jesus left Peter the keys to the kingdom for a reason. Example you have a Judge. For one reason, someone has to have authority.

Now we as RC can teach one another, but here is the big difference, If a RC calls another RC on a matter they will go to the Priest and ask him. Bottom line if this matter does not get settled it could go up to the Pope. Then we believe he has the keys to the kingdom so he has the last say.

Then we all agree with one thing. We must. Jesus did not leave us the Church to separated us, it was to unite us all together.

So to make a long story short we will all get the same and right answer. We believe that the Pope has it from God. If we did not, why believe at all.

In Protestant church’s there really is no authority. Every Pastor has his own opinion. Not in the RC. We must all unite together.

So we can teach, but we do not have authority to give our own opinion. We must stay within the fullness of the Church.

Now don’t get me wrong, we can and do misunderstand at times too, but we except correction and authority from the Pope. The way Jesus told us to.👍
 
Try not to get too worked up over NonCatholic.

If he knew the Truth I do know the truth-do you?, I feel he would never call it deceit. You don’t know what you are talking about or the context - Melanie does. His type of non-Catholic apologetics is quite abrupt and argumentative Anyone who doesn’t share Steve’s views, I know. He does indeed seem to have quite an anti-Catholic agenda. I love the Catholic people and my heart mourns over you. These are difficult people to have logical discussions with, as they seem to be dominated by anger over The Church, and are rigid in their misunderstanding. ridgid to the truth as the truth is divisive as you will one day we will all find out.

Appeared to me that he was accusing you of deceiving others (which of course, you weren’t) as opposed to calling Jesus a lie.
Melanie knows exactly the context, but you are quick to make judgments about others who disagree with you…just an observation…I share the truth of God’s word and many don’t want to hear it
Just an observation.

God Bless
 
You have not read all posts and you left out bound in your sins or … You have taken it out of context and you know it.
If you had bothered to read my post, I said that I probably should have reviewed your statement again. Your problem is that you copied and pasted one man’s opinion (from: www.gracebiblefellowship-tx.org/Sermons*) *as if it were fact.
***There were the Apostles and disciples there - hello! If you gave someone the gospel message and they reject it, then what would Heaven conclude and wouldn’t you conclude the same thing at that point of time? Yes!, if they accepted, then you would conclude the positive, just as Heaven would. Here is the full context of Matt 18 "Matthew 18:15-20 - ***
15 "If your brother sins, go and show him his fault in private; . . .
I didn’t say there were only Apostles there. Again – he was speaking to the authority of the Church, - not the individual. He never says, “Decide on your own what to do with this sinful brother.”
To deny that is to deny the text and add things that just aren’t there.

The church is made up of individuals unless you are RC?
Don’t really understand the question, be here goes. An individual is not the Church. Your brand of “Lone Ranger Christianity” is not only NOT encouraged in scripture – we are warned against it.

As St. Paul said in 1 Cor. 12:20-26:

***But as it is, there are many parts, yet one body. ***
***The eye cannot say to the hand, “I do not need you,” ******nor ******again the head to the feet, “I do not need you.” ***
***Indeed, the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are all the more necessary, and those parts of the body that we consider less honorable we surround with greater honor, and our less presentable parts are treated with greater propriety, whereas our more presentable parts do not need this. But God has so constructed the body as to give greater honor to a part that is without it, so that there may be no division in the body, but that the parts may have the same concern for one another. ******If (one) part suffers, ******all ******the parts suffer with it; if one part is honored, ******all ***the parts share its joy.
Don’t know about that, I’m a Chrisitian and belong to the unified body of Christ.
Do** you? Which body of Christ do you belong to? The one Jesus established 2000 years ago or one that was set up by a man less than a**** hundred**** years ago (Matt. 16:18)? What church are you affiliated with because your profile says, **none-Personal relationship with Jesus Christ”.
 
Melanie knows exactly the context
I do. I know that you have called the WORD of God “Deceit”. But Jesus is not a lie, or a “deceit”. So perhaps you are calling me a liar instead? Or both of us? What is it?

And Steve, thanks for your analysis and opinion. I’m not particularly worked up about the constant attacks on Catholics, which in my experience is almost always done in ignorance. Attacking Jesus gets me going tho’. And if there is any whiff of that, then I want to set the record straight. If someone is simply calling ME a liar, well, I know I’m not one & they’re the one that is utterly uncharitable & unChristian. I am sorry for them but limited in what sort of difference I can make in their understanding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top