Where Does Ron Howard's and Tom Hanks's Anti-Catholicism Come From?

  • Thread starter Thread starter swampfox
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t believe that Tom Hanks or Ron Howard are anti-Catholic myself.

I just believe that when it comes to making a movie about a huge conspiracy involving a religon, that the Catholic Church is the only one that they can use. I mean, what other faith has the Vatican, the Magisterium, St. Peters, 2000 years of history, the Cardinals and Bishops and all the other “props” that would make for a good thriller? I certainly don’t think anybody would see this movie if the villian were the Methodists or the Presbyterians or the Jews, do you? What kind of villians could they make out of them?

In a way, Howard is doing the Catholics a favor - he’s showing the world who is the one, true faith…
 
Tom Hanks belongs to the Greek Orthodox Church. He was previosuly Catholic and LDS.
I was kind of pondering this question myself; who and why would someone make a movie like this that is so offensive to many Catholics???

I read a little bit about Tom Hanks.

From what I have read, it seems like he has tried several different forms of Christianity at different times in his life, including Catholicism and Methodism, and was once a Mormon (his mother was a Mormon).

Tom Hanks married a woman who was Greek Orthodox.

I didn’t research Ron Howard.

I have to specualte also the Hollywood mindset has to do something about it.

The Hays Code which was the moral code that Hollywood adopted in the 1930s and which regulated (with financial penalties) the mainstream Hollywood film industry since the 1930s to 1954 was written by a Jesuit priest and a Catholic layman, and Hollywood accepted it only after the Catholic Church in America played a key role in a boycott of the Hollywood film industry around 1933.

Hollywood has always peddled sex and, later on, graphic violence in their movies because sex and graphic violence sells.

So the Catholic Church (at least in the first half of the 20th century and I think to a much lesser extent less vocally now IMO) opposed immorality at the movies.

So, as with many films, this is kind of Hollywood getting back at the Catholic Church.

You add to that Hollywood power, ego, the fact that Anti-Catholicism remains strong in the United States (organizations like the KKK and the Black Legion have lost their power, but culturally speaking, Anti-Catholicism appears to have reached a dizzying new height in 21st Century America.

I think this new zenith of Anti-Catholicism is fueled to a large and popular degree by the clergy sex abuse scandal in this decade, although Anti-Catholicism has always been a force in America), Utilitarian and Neo-Nietschean philosophies and modes of thinking that dominate the university and business worlds in the USA, and also the fact that people disagree on issues of Catholic moral teaching, as well as plain old bigotry and the fact that Christianity, and especially in the United States, Catholicism, serves as a whipping post for some, there is a market present to cater to and sell Anti-Catholicism through films and television programs and other media (newspapers, video games, comic books).

There have been a whole bunch of Anti-Catholic films; and there will be a whole lot more in the future.

Anti-Catholicism has become a staple part of modern American entertainment, even though Catholics have contributed much in the past and contribute much now to the pluralistic Democracy we live in.

Hollywood films have displayed blatant bigotry in the past, especially most noticeably against racial minorities (African-Americans in films like Birth of a Nation and other films, movie cartoons; Asians and Asian-Americans).

It looks like Catholics and Catholicism and too a smaller degree, other Christians denominations, especially conservative Protestant sects (e.g., Evangelicals) have largely taken their place.

The other thing I found interesting was that the Directors of these films say they are purely works of fiction, yet they use the names of and / or portray real Catholic ecclesial organizations like Opus Dei and the Magisterium.

Read more about the Hays Code in a prior post I made:

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=221769
 
Maybe this has something to do with gays and lesbians never having held any power to speak of in historical times, and have never hurt a fly, whereas the Catholic Church has held significant power, and is also known to have abused that power on several occasions? To hear Catholics claim persecution will undoubtedly stick in the craw of many people who have been crushed by the Catholic Church.

It is disheartening to me to see how little knowledge of history Catholics on this thread exhibit about their own Church. To bypass all the talk about the Inquisition, forced conversions of Jews and Moslems, and all the rest, keep in mind that the Church is still under scrutiny in this country for having sheltered, aided, and abetted child rapists.

By the way, the short plot summary of Angels And Demons goes as follows: the Illuminati have resurfaced, have stolen a small amount of antimatter from CERN, and are threatening to blow up the Vatican with it. The good guys are out to stop them. And sure there is a bad apple among the faithful, but that shouldn’t shake anyone’s faith.

Does that sound very anti-Catholic to you, all in all?
oiy vey–
 
My personal opinion is the complaints about these movies is a tempest in a teapot. The movies are being made because they make lots of money-not because Tom Hanks or Ron howard or dan Brown are anti-catholic zealots. Brown has written other books that have nothing to do with religion.
Nonsense. It’s not just about money. It’s about power and control. See: The Creation of the Media by Paul Starr.

From the beginning, those who had the power of the printed word used it for propaganda purposes. Hitler came to power partly because his message went over the radio. John Kennedy came to power partly because he won a debate on TV.

For those who have media power, outside influences are a given. Recently, hidden documents revealed the money exchanged between Hollywood and cigarette manufacturers. The deal was simple: if you show your actors smoking on screen we’ll pay you money.

Ideology can be bought and paid for too. Read this:

christianitytoday.com/movies/news/2009/ishollywoodanticatholic.html?start=5

Bashing Christianity is all the rage, and people get rewarded by various groups for portraying them in a positive light. And their detractors in a negative light. World War II had more than a few propaganda films. The current Atheist vs Christianity battle is on.

Peace,
Ed
 
Maybe this has something to do with gays and lesbians never having held any power to speak of in historical times, and have never hurt a fly, whereas the Catholic Church has held significant power, and is also known to have abused that power on several occasions? To hear Catholics claim persecution will undoubtedly stick in the craw of many people who have been crushed by the Catholic Church.

It is disheartening to me to see how little knowledge of history Catholics on this thread exhibit about their own Church. To bypass all the talk about the Inquisition, forced conversions of Jews and Moslems, and all the rest, keep in mind that the Church is still under scrutiny in this country for having sheltered, aided, and abetted child rapists.

By the way, the short plot summary of Angels And Demons goes as follows: the Illuminati have resurfaced, have stolen a small amount of antimatter from CERN, and are threatening to blow up the Vatican with it. The good guys are out to stop them. And sure there is a bad apple among the faithful, but that shouldn’t shake anyone’s faith.

Does that sound very anti-Catholic to you, all in all?
That doesn’t even sound very plausible. The Illuminati? Have you done any research on this organization?

And with all due respect to any gays or lesbians reading this, when was the last time you saw a newspaper headline that read: Lesbian shoots store owner.? Or Atheist guns down 3 in front of bar? (With all due respect to Atheists on that last one.)

Seriously, if your only view of the world is a formula where power + control = what I want, I suggest you rethink that.

The Bible tells us, no man is perfect, no not one. That certainly includes me and every Catholic I know. We, all of us, carry a deadly flaw called sin.

I’ve heard about what the Church has done in the past from an informed and reliable source, but the distortions I’ve heard are worse. Read this:

christianitytoday.com/movies/news/2009/ishollywoodanticatholic.html?start=5

The Church is doing what it can about the priest abuse scandal. Pope Benedict has met personally with some victims.

We, all of us, have to follow what God has written in our hearts, and pick ourselves up and ask for forgiveness when we fail.

Peace,
Ed
 
Nonsense. It’s not just about money. It’s about power and control. See: The Creation of the Media by Paul Starr.

From the beginning, those who had the power of the printed word used it for propaganda purposes. Hitler came to power partly because his message went over the radio. John Kennedy came to power partly because he won a debate on TV.

For those who have media power, outside influences are a given. Recently, hidden documents revealed the money exchanged between Hollywood and cigarette manufacturers. The deal was simple: if you show your actors smoking on screen we’ll pay you money.

Ideology can be bought and paid for too. Read this:

christianitytoday.com/movies/news/2009/ishollywoodanticatholic.html?start=5

Bashing Christianity is all the rage, and people get rewarded by various groups for portraying them in a positive light. And their detractors in a negative light. World War II had more than a few propaganda films. The current Atheist vs Christianity battle is on.

Peace,
Ed
As I pointed out before The Davinci Code took in 718 million dollars. Fotr that amount of money most film makers would bash their own mothers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top