I
iaskquestions
Guest
Protestants claim that the church is invisible. But does the Bible say so?
Well, no one can claim this thread is invisible! Its in triplicateProtestants claim that the church is invisible. But does the Bible say so?
Show me the quote please.Augustine, for example recognized that there was a visible and invisible church in dealing with the Catholic Church itself.
The word “church” in the New Testament is used to refer both to the church in the strict sense of all believers in Christ of all times and places, and to the church in the broader sense of visible assemblies gathered around Word and sacraments. St. Paul refers to the church in the stricter sense in 1 Cor. 1:2 as "all those everywhere who call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ - their Lord and ours… . This is the body of Christ (1 Cor. 12), whose membership is known only to God, for He alone can see into the human heart and know whether true faith in Christ is present (thus it is “invisible” to the human eye and is an article of faith). In the Apostles Creed we confess that we believe in “the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints.”Protestants claim that the church is invisible. But does the Bible say so?
I will try to find it. I know that it is in his work in refutation of the Donatists.Show me the quote please.
Some protestants claim the church is invisible, not all as a blanket statement. There are many liturgical, apostolic teaching, non-Roman churches that see themselves as part of that original church that is very visible. Whether or not you agree they are part is irrelevant.Protestants claim that the church is invisible. But does the Bible say so?
On Baptism: Against the Donatists Book 3 Chapter 19 Paragraph 26Show me the quote please.
newadvent.org/fathers/14083.htmBut the enemies of this brotherly love, whether they are openly without, or appear to be within, are false Christians, and antichrists. For when they have found an opportunity, they go out, as it is written: “A man wishing to separate himself from his friends, seeks opportunities.” But even if occasions are wanting, while they seem to be within, they are severed from that invisible bond of love. Whence St. John says, “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for had they been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us.” He does not say that they ceased to be of us by going out, but that they went out because they were not of us.
newadvent.org/fathers/12023.htm
- The second rule is about the twofold division of the body of the Lord; but this indeed is not a suitable name, for that is really no part of the body of Christ which will not be with Him in eternity. We ought, therefore, to say that the rule is about the true and the mixed body of the Lord, or the true and the counterfeit, or some such name; because, not to speak of eternity, hypocrites cannot even now be said to be in Him, although they seem to be in His Church. And hence this rule might be designated thus: Concerning the mixed Church. Now this rule requires the reader to be on his guard when Scripture, although it has now come to address or speak of a different set of persons, seems to be addressing or speaking of the same persons as before, just as if both sets constituted one body in consequence of their being for the time united in a common participation of the sacraments.
Protestants claim that the church is invisible. But does the Bible say so?
That’s how I understand it. But, I would say that just because something is invisible that does not mean it does not exist.Catholics also have the invisable Church as seen in Ecclesia Triumphans (Church Triumphant), Ecclesia Penitens (Church Suffering), and Ecclesia Expectans (Church Expectant)
That reminds me of something I learned in one of my theology classes-- that most of the Church isn’t even on earth – the souls in purgatory and in heaven comprise the greater number of believers. An interesting thing to ponder.Catholics also have the invisable Church as seen in Ecclesia Triumphans (Church Triumphant), Ecclesia Penitens (Church Suffering), and Ecclesia Expectans (Church Expectant)
Nice questionHow can you bring a problem to the Church if you cant find it?
The Gospel of St. Matthew 18:15-17 If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector.
I don’t see him stating that the church is invisible. He is talking about the bond of love among Christians.On Baptism: Against the Donatists Book 3 Chapter 19 Paragraph 26]
I don’t see him saying that here as well.On Christian Doctrine Book 3 Chapter 32 Paragraph 45
Augustine talks of the about the two-fold division of the Church in that there are members of the Church who are not really members of the Body of Christ. There are people who seem to be in the Church but are not really. Can you point out to me anyone that you know for certain will be with Christ for eternity? If not how can you see the true body in what Augustine calls the “mixed Church”? He indicates that Scripture often speaks of what seems to be the same body of people when it is really talking about 2 different bodies of people.I don’t see him stating that the church is invisible. He is talking about the bond of love among Christians.
I don’t see him saying that here as well.
Please explain how you think he is saying that the church is invisible.
Isn’t Augustine speaking of the wheat and the tares analogy?Augustine talks of the about the two-fold division of the Church in that there are members of the Church who are not really members of the Body of Christ. There are people who seem to be in the Church but are not really. Can you point out to me anyone that you know for certain will be with Christ for eternity? If not how can you see the true body in what Augustine calls the “mixed Church”? He indicates that Scripture often speaks of what seems to be the same body of people when it is really talking about 2 different bodies of people.
No, but he does distinguish between those who are members of the visible Church and those who are true members of Christ’s body. Protestants agree that there are visible churches which are the various organized Christian communities. The visible Church has its functions. However the invisible Church is that subset in the visible churches that actually belong to the body of Christ and will be with Him in Heaven. As no one can judge another, it is impossible to say who actually is part of the true body,Isn’t Augustine speaking of the wheat and the tares analogy?
I read that here in another thread.
He is speaking of division within the Chruch not division of the Church. IOW, there will be some who will cry Lord Lord, but…
Thats going to happen everywhere.
But, that is not at all a declaration that there is not a visible Church from the beginning to the end.
I would agree that there are people who belong to the body of Christ that did not get a chance to know of him or church in any manner you look at that word.No, but he does distinguish between those who are members of the visible Church and those who are true members of Christ’s body. Protestants agree that there are visible churches which are the various organized Christian communities. The visible Church has its functions. However the invisible Church is that subset in the visible churches that actually belong to the body of Christ and will be with Him in Heaven. As no one can judge another, it is impossible to say who actually is part of the true body,
The point is not that there are two churches. That is not what invisible/visible means. It means the Church is all those who have faith in Christ, since faith cannot be seen, it is called invisible. The invisible Church gathers around word and sacrament. That is a visible representation of the body of Christ. But not everyone at such a gathering is a member of the body of Christ since they may be unbelievers.Isn’t Augustine speaking of the wheat and the tares analogy?
I read that here in another thread.
He is speaking of division within the Chruch not division of the Church. IOW, there will be some who will cry Lord Lord, but…
Thats going to happen everywhere.
But, that is not at all a declaration that there is not a visible Church from the beginning to the end.