J
Jerusha
Guest
See my sig line, for one.
If such intermarriages took place, it would have been after the Book of Mormon period had ended. The Book of Mormon covers a period of history approximately from 600 BC to 400 AD. It does not give us any information beyond that date. We don’t know anything about the history of the Book of Mormon people from AD 400 until the discovery of America by the Europeans. If such intermarriages took place, it would have been during that period; but no one can say for certain that it has. The only way we could know for certain would be by a revelation form the Lord. As far as I know such revelation has not been given to the Church (or if it has, it has not been made public).Why would the Book of Mormon not mention the Nephites intermarrying with Asian descended Native Americans? . . .
Seems like you’re one of the few Mormons I’ve seen who understands that intermarriage with descendants of Asians during the Book of Mormon period can’t be defended from the Book of Mormon itself. Great answer.If such intermarriages took place, it would have been after the Book of Mormon period had ended. The Book of Mormon covers a period of history approximately from 600 BC to 400 AD. It does not give us any information beyond that date. We don’t know anything about the history of the Book of Mormon people from AD 400 until the discovery of America by the Europeans. If such intermarriages took place, it would have been during that period; but no one can say for certain that it has. The only way we could know for certain would be by a revelation form the Lord. As far as I know such revelation has not been given to the Church (or if it has, it has not been made public).
zerinus
Patience, grasshopper. Wait for the whole paper.You’ve got to be kidding. That’s not an answer to my question. When does the Book of Mormon say that any of Lehi’s party intermarried with anyone else? Your quotes from the Book of Mormon in this regard seem irrelevant.
It might have. Unfortunately, the book of mormon is an abridgement. It was much longer but it was abridged by the prophet Mormon. He only included what he considered important.Why would the Book of Mormon not mention the Nephites intermarrying with Asian descended Native Americans? It would seem to me to be a pretty big deal. The Bible discusses Israelites marrying other peoples as being one of their great sins. You would at least figure the Book of Mormon authors would mention them running into another race and intermarrying with them. And I’m not talking about the Mulekites since they would have been of the same race as the Nephites.
We know very little because there was much that Mormon left out when he abriged the book of mormon. Much history or customs would not have seen the light of day as the book was cut down to a more manageable size.If such intermarriages took place, it would have been after the Book of Mormon period had ended. The Book of Mormon covers a period of history approximately from 600 BC to 400 AD. It does not give us any information beyond that date. We don’t know anything about the history of the Book of Mormon people from AD 400 until the discovery of America by the Europeans. If such intermarriages took place, it would have been during that period; but no one can say for certain that it has. The only way we could know for certain would be by a revelation form the Lord. As far as I know such revelation has not been given to the Church (or if it has, it has not been made public).
zerinus
Firstly, we know what we know about the Book of Mormon. We don’t know what the Book doesn’t tell us. The Book of Mormon doesn’t mention Morlocks either. That does not mean that there were therefore Morlocks in the Book of Mormon, but it wasn’t mentioned because it is just an abridgement. We know only what the book tells us, not what it doesn’t tell us. Secondly, if the Book of Mormon people had come into contact with colonies of other races beside themselves, it would have been of sufficient importance to have been mentioned in the book, abridgement though it is. The fact that no such thing is mentioned is strong evidence that it didn’t happen. And thirdly, the tenor of the whole of the Book of Mormon speaks against such an idea. It is true that the Book of Mormon prophecies of the migration of other nations to the Americas at some future date; but it also says that for the duration of the time that the people of Israelite descent (i.e. the descendents of Lehi and people of Mulek) lived on and prospered in the land with the true gospel existing among them, that such migrations would not take place:We know very little because there was much that Mormon left out when he abriged the book of mormon. Much history or customs would not have seen the light of day as the book was cut down to a more manageable size.
This story about intermarriage is actually irrelevant. I don’t say that to be dismissive or unkind, merely that intermarriage with other groups OR NOT would produce the same scientific evidence for a Hebrew migration several centuries BC - ZERO. Whether or not the alleged Hebrew migrants intermarried would not affect whether their genes were passed down from generation to generation to the present day. The science is irrefutable ~ there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that there was any Hebrew migration to the Americas at that time period ~ regardless of their marriage habits.I have read several statements from Mormons that their Nephites and Lamanites married Siberians who already lived in the Americas when the Nephites and Lamanites arrived. Can you tell me exactly where the Book of Mormon says the Nephites and Lamanites intermarried with another group of people that were already in the Americas? When I was a Mormon, I always thought the Native Americans all descended from Lehi and his fellow travelers to the Americas.
Z,There is nothing in the Book of Mormon that teaches anything of that kind.
Yes, that has been the prevailing opinion, and I dare say to some extent it still is. However, in recent years another theory about the geographical spread of the Book of Mormon people has emerged known as the “limited geography theory”. There is some merit to it, because the distances that the Book of Mormon talks about, although large by their standards, would be relatively small compared to the whole area of the American continent; which implies that the Book of Mormon societies developed within a relatively small geographical area, which in turn implies that other (non-Israelite) societies might have existed on the continent at the same time unbeknown to them. There is some intellectual merit to it; but it is speculation. The truth of the matter is that it has not been revealed if such societies existed on the continent at that time or not.
zerinus
Good day MelanieAnne! I’m so very glad to meet you, even if it’s online only. I hope you are doing well today. I’m Finrock and am new to this forum. I just wanted to share with you my faith. I do understand your point-of-view and I respect your beliefs. I have no desire to contend with you about evidences for the Book of Mormon. Not because I don’t think it would be an interesting conversation, but I honestly feel we have a better way of knowing what is truth and what is not truth. Anyways, my only desire is that this post will be at least a tiny bit edifying and helpful in understand the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.The real issue is whether or not there is a shred of evidence to authenticate the Book of Mormon story. In fact, there is NONE. Beyond the numerous flaws (often listed on this forum in one thread or another) there is absolutely no DNA evidence whatsoever that the Book of Mormon is anything beyond, as our dear Jerusha puts it, “a religious novel”. Mitochondrial DNA mapping is likely something Joseph Smith hadn’t counted on when circulating the Book of Mormon as “scripture”. That isn’t the first problem he obviously didn’t consider, and it may not be the last. The evidence, however, is quite clear that, for a variety of reasons, the Book of Mormon is not revealed scripture, it is merely a work of fiction, not something one should trust with one’s immortal soul.
Good evening Jerusha! How are you today? I hope you are doing well!And for every positive quotation and story you pull out of the BOM, I can pull out at least three negative ones. While you all believe that the Holy Spirit speaks to you in the BOM (and D&C), some people live by the negative ones. How do you explain that?
Perhaps you need a “Guide to understanding the BOM”, given it is written so badly.
You need to reform yourselves before you go criticizing and prostelytizing to others. You have become like the Nephites who allowed the Gadinaton robbers to become as one with them.
:takethat:
Yep!! In a better mood today. Worked out some of the stuff in my dreams last night.general observation and asking a rhetorical question![]()
Hi Finrock,Good day MelanieAnne! I’m so very glad to meet you, even if it’s online only. I hope you are doing well today. I’m Finrock and am new to this forum. I just wanted to share with you my faith. I do understand your point-of-view and I respect your beliefs. I have no desire to contend with you about evidences for the Book of Mormon. Not because I don’t think it would be an interesting conversation, but I honestly feel we have a better way of knowing what is truth and what is not truth. Anyways, my only desire is that this post will be at least a tiny bit edifying and helpful in understand the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
I personally love the Book of Mormon. Every time that I read from it (except those times when I am just kinda skimming and not reading), I am drawn closer to my Savior Jesus Christ. Through-out my life, I have learned how to become a better disciple of Jesus Christ because of the things that I have read in the Book of Mormon.
Some wonderful doctrine can also be found in the Book of Mormon. For instance, I would like you to find the most obvious scripture in the Bible that tells us Jesus Christ is God. Then, I would like for you to consider this scripture from the Book of Mormon:
3 Nephi “18 And behold, they began to pray; and they did pray unto Jesus, calling him their Lord and their God.”
Morm. 3 “21 And also that ye may believe the gospel of Jesus Christ, which ye shall have among you; and also that the Jews, the covenant people of the Lord, shall have other witness besides him whom they saw and heard, that Jesus, whom they slew, was the every Christ and the very God.”
3 Nephi 5:20 “I have reason to bless my God and my Savior Jesus Christ, that he brought our fathers out of the land of Jerusalem…”
2 Nephi 26 “12 And as I spake concerning the convincing of the Jews, that Jesus is the very Christ, it must needs be that the Gentiles be convinced also that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God”
And these are only a few examples. I quoted these scriptures only to illustrate how the Book of Mormon strengthens and confirms the Holy Bible. These scriptures make it abundantly clear the Jesus Christ is God. They leave no room for misinterpretation. There are many other examples like this in the Book of Mormon where something that is taught in the Bible vaguely, is borne out in greater detail in the Book of Mormon. It is, as the title indicates, another testament of Jesus Christ.
All in all, my faith in God the Father has increased as I’ve read the Book of Mormon. My faith in Jesus Christ has increased as I’ve read the Book of Mormon. My understanding of the gospel of Jesus Christ has grown as I’ve read the Book of Mormon. My understanding of the Bible has increased as I’ve read the Book of Mormon. My desire to do good, to be kind, gentle, meek, humble, and to follow Jesus with all that I am, has increased from reading the Book of Mormon. My life experiences with the Book of Mormon have shown me that it is much more than just a “religious novel”. Couple my life experiences with a witness from the Holy Spirit, I have no doubt that the book is truly from God. It has been a wellspring of life giving water that has lead me to worship and love Jesus and his gospel.
Kind Regards,
Finrock
Good afternoon MelanieAnn. I hope you are doing fantastic today! Thank you so much for taking the time to read my post and respond to it.Hi Finrock,
That’s great for you that a work of religious fiction can be spiritually uplifting. I say that with all sincerity. There are many works of fiction that are uplifting in some way or another. The fact that something moves you spiritually does not convert fiction into Truth. The fact that someone might be emotionally invested in wanting something to be true does not make it so.
For me, the hoax that has been perpetrated by Joseph Smith and his cohorts in creating the Book of Mormon story negates any spiritually uplifting aspects that might be found there. I am interested in objective truth. There is not a shred of evidence to support the Book of Mormon story, while the evidence that it is a 19th Century work of fiction is substantial and continues to mount.
But if it works for you, that’s great. You’re just never going to convince me that it is anything more than fiction. And I hope, for the sake of your immortal soul, that the story about receiving the Golden Plates from an angel is just as fictional as the rest of the Book of Mormon.
Hi Finrock, thank you for your contributions. I have found your posts to be inspiring and educational. Just out of interest, what is your opinion of the “limited geography” theory of the Book of Mormon? Do you agree with it, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree? If so, what are your reasons?Good afternoon MelanieAnn. I hope you are doing fantastic today! Thank you so much for taking the time to read my post and respond to it.
I just wanted to clarify that for me the Book of Mormon is more than just spiritually uplifting. It is, in a very real way, leading me to Jesus Christ and has helped me to know Him better, to love Him more, and to dedicate my life to following Him. It has been a great blessing in my life.
You make some very good points. It is very true that because something might move you spiritually, doesn’t make it true. I’ve known people who’ve fallen in to that mistake. I like to call it the Oprah phenomenon (ask me if you want more details on this point). Also, you are right, being emotionally invested in something being true doesn’t necessarily make something true. I, personally, would never subscribe to such a thing, but I’m glad you pointed that out because there certainly are people who do subscribe to that way of thinking. And, again you are right, fiction isn’t truth and no matter how it might move someone, doesn’t make it any less fiction. On the flip side, truth is truth, regardless of how we’ve obtained it. For instance, if the principle that Jesus is God is true, then it is true whether I learn it from the Bible or from a weekly Newspaper. I, personally, never reject truth (just like your statements have been true and I accept them because they are truth), regardless of where I learned it. Whether from a televangalist, a Catholic in a chat forum, or ancient writings of the Hindu spiritual leaders, if it is true, then it is true no matter whose mouth proclaimed it.
I would never, ever, dream of hoping to convince you or anyone that the Book of Mormon is true. It simply isn’t within my power to do that. And, plus, I’m very poor at convincing people. As a matter of fact, I’m probably the worst there is. I’m very glad that the onus isn’t on me, else I would be damned for sure. However, I do believe that the Holy Ghost can convince you or anyone. It is how I know the book is true. No flesh and blood convinced me, but my Father who is in heaven convinced me that it is true, and I believe Him.
Be well, MelanieAnn!
Kind Regards,
Finrock
Greetings zerinus. You’re welcome and thank you for the complement.Hi Finrock, thank you for your contributions. I have found your posts to be inspiring and educational. Just out of interest, what is your opinion of the “limited geography” theory of the Book of Mormon? Do you agree with it, disagree, or neither agree nor disagree? If so, what are your reasons?
zerinus