D
distracted
Guest
so much for āLove your neighbor as yourselfādistracted, just in case that was for me :slapfight: =![]()
so much for āLove your neighbor as yourselfādistracted, just in case that was for me :slapfight: =![]()
you know, i really donāt know waht you are talking about here⦠what orginal post you are referring to⦠you said that if i was referring to you⦠[etc]Apologies if you took umbrage. I posted what I think the phrase means having heard it amongst Baptists and Pentecostals, and didnāt mean any more than that. Honest governor.
Iād take you up on your offer to discuss it further, but have learned that on this kind of thing we will probably never have a meaning of minds - thatās what the smilies meant, Iād just want to sit it out. It kind of sapped my will to live last time around.
Another thing that is sapping my will to live is that my wife just told me weāre going to a fancy dress party in an hour. Party fine, but fancy dress?![]()
It doesnāt, but, conceptually it is accurate if you define the word accept to mean follow, believe and implement.Where in scripture does it state āto accept Christ as our personal Lord and Saviorā?
Yes, inventing purgatory and indulgences are far worse than taking words off the bible and inventing the translationi have noticed that a lot of protestants paraphrase the Bible a LOT⦠and to the point of it meaning something entirely differently than intended⦠I think Joel Olsteen is one of the worst offenders in thisā¦
strange since they claim to adhere to the Word ⦠and claim to adhere to it FAR better than Catholics who - according to them⦠invent stuff like Purgatory and indlulgences and etc⦠(the Church did not āinventā Purgatory⦠The concept is in Scripture, but even if it werenāt, the Catholic Church doesnāt just willy-nilly invent doctrinesā¦)
anyhow⦠just strange how the pot is always calling the supposed kettle blackā¦
Iām a Catholic whoās been in hundreds of Protestant church services over the years and endured the evangelical double-speak like āpersonal relationship with Jesus.ā Protestants get all huffy when you call them on their anti-Catholic code phrases, but they spend a whole lot of their time attempting to turn Catholic Christians into Protestant Christians ā and doing so dishonestly in my opinion ā so they have it coming.amazing⦠that you say all this and we still donāt (or i donāt) know exactly where YOU yourself are coming from about it all⦠I mean, there for awhile, in the begining of your post you sounded unCatholic yourselfā¦![]()
Iām a Catholic whoās been in hundreds of Protestant church services over the years and endured the evangelical double-speak like āpersonal relationship with Jesus.ā Protestants get all huffy when you call them on their anti-Catholic code phrases, but they spend a whole lot of their time attempting to turn Catholic Christians into Protestant Christians ā and doing so dishonestly in my opinion ā so they have it coming.
Iām sorry if my lengthy post was confusing.
i had a hard time w/ the word āpersonalā in that phrase long b4 i realized this Catholic⦠uh⦠way of being communalā¦The difference about Catholics and these Evangelical Protestants is that for Catholics, our Personal Relationship with Christ is indistinguishable with our relationship with the entire Church. Christ told us that what we do to the least of our bretheren, we do unto Him. So loving our bretheren is the same as loving God, and loving God is helping the least of our bretheren. There is no distinction, it goes hand in hand.
When we receive Jesus in the Eucharist, we donāt receive Him just for ourselves. The Eucharist not only binds us to Christ, we are also bound to His Church, which means we are binded to everyone in Communion with Christ through the Eucharist.
So its really hard for a Catholic to say that he or she has a personal relationship with Christ, because being part of the True Church of Christ, our relationship with God and with one another are intertwined and indistinguishable.
i was speaking 2 a Baptist minister the other day⦠asking him what all he believed in⦠He was totally against abortoin even in rape / incest⦠which i thought was SO coolā¦Yes, inventing purgatory and indulgences are far worse than taking words off the bible and inventing the translation ::
So ⦠now, after many years of learning to repent of your āmortalsā, being led of God confess and receive full restoration IN CHRIST ā¦i have committed many mortal sins after being⦠filled w/ t he Spirit,as the Catholics call it. That was yrs ago⦠and thanks be to God i found the Church & started getting my soul cleansedā¦
I think that thereās a lot of intellectual dishonesty involved around the notion of āeternal security.ā If a person ābackslidesā after being āsaved,ā many evangelical protestants will do what your Baptist friend did and say they were never saved in the first place! Which begs the question, how do you know youāre saved? This question caused a lot of concern among Protestants in the 18th century, for example (as reported in biographies of Jonathan Edward, for example). In the contemporary evangelical churches, they point to the bright line of praying the sinnerās prayer, but then kick dirt on that line when the person who was saved lives a sinful, unchristian life. Another thing to consider is the common phenomenon of Catholics who ask Jesus to forgive them and invite Jesus into their hearts to be their Lord and Savior. That should be enough for an evangelical, right? Yet it never is. As long as the Catholic is not re-baptized and joins an evangelical church, the evangelicals will always question whether the Catholic is saved. Go figure. Intellectual consistency? Not so much.i was speaking 2 a Baptist minister the other day⦠asking him what all he believed in⦠He was totally against abortoin even in rape / incest⦠which i thought was SO coolā¦rather surprised me⦠Then we agreed on some other stuff (canāt recall) but then he ruined it by saying he believed in eternal securty. I told him about a case of a serial murderer who had once been āborn againā⦠then went on a killing spree⦠He (not surprisingly) said that all those who claim to be born again are notā¦
but i know from personal experience that just having gone thro that expereince does NOT mean you will never want to (or actually do) a mortal sin. ā¦i dont know where nonCthlics (some) get this notion that whne you are born-again you wonāt sin in a big way. If you arenāt catechized (lke me) you will not realize how damaging sin is (until you experience the consequneces
) ⦠True, i never went on a killing spree
(thought about murder tho⦠one of my exes
)⦠but Iāve done awful things after being āsavedā (hate that phrase cuz it implies its a one time event⦠the Bible clearly says it is a process) Work out your salvatoin w/ fear & trembling (James 2:12
![]()
huh??? i have been to confession a zillion times since i came back⦠if thatās what you are saying (?)So ⦠now, after many years of learning to repent of your āmortalsā, being led of God confess and receive full restoration IN CHRIST ā¦
absolutely not. I think born-agains go to Hell if they do not do what Jesus says⦠and Jesus wants us to belong to HIS Church so if they stay away from that⦠well, God knowsā¦Do you now believe in Eternal Security ?
KOH???Would Christ ever let you down [let go of you] ⦠if you sincerely desire to see the KOH, and pray often for that eventuality ?
Jesus doesnāt let go of anyone but we let go of Him⦠If we do so without realizing it, He draws us back⦠He calls everyone⦠(even those who do realize it⦠)I think this is what Protestants mean when they speak of E.S. ⦠although they donāt always say as much in their explanations.
I think that thereās a lot of intellectual dishonesty involved around the notion of āeternal security.ā If a person ābackslidesā after being āsaved,ā many evangelical protestants will do what your Baptist friend did and say they were never saved in the first place! Which begs the question, how do you know youāre saved? This question caused a lot of concern among Protestants in the 18th century, for example (as reported in biographies of Jonathan Edward, for example). In the contemporary evangelical churches, they point to the bright line of praying the sinnerās prayer, but then kick dirt on that line when the person who was saved lives a sinful, unchristian life. Another thing to consider is the common phenomenon of Catholics who ask Jesus to forgive them and invite Jesus into their hearts to be their Lord and Savior. That should be enough for an evangelical, right? Yet it never is. As long as the Catholic is not re-baptized and joins an evangelical church, the evangelicals will always question whether the Catholic is saved. Go figure. Intellectual consistency? Not so much.
They could (and probably do) say the same about us - after all, we believe that you have to be a member of the Church, to be saved.kinda makes you wonder⦠if they donāt believe youāre saved even after saying the sinnerās prayerā¦(if you stay Catholic)⦠and you have to join their church and all⦠Could it be they are just wanting your $$$??
Exodus 20:=alid35;6905269]Where in scripture does it state āto accept Christ as our personal Lord and Saviorā?
yes but we dont teach that you have to give $$ to the Church to be a memberā¦They could (and probably do) say the same about us - after all, we believe that you have to be a member of the Church, to be saved.![]()
not all Cathlics agree on thisā¦They could (and probably do) say the same about us - after all, we believe that you have to be a member of the Church, to be saved.![]()
Its good to know you were told not to be a judge of others ā¦I think born-agains go to Hell if they do not do what Jesus says⦠and Jesus wants us to belong to HIS Church so if they stay away from that⦠well, God knowsā¦