This was 12 years ago; however, from my understanding, things haven’t changed that much. One of them was Fr. Andrew Cifirni and he was one of their top guns, from what the Paulists had said. Oddly enough, the parishioners didn’t seem to go with the changes ND suggested. The Pastor was all for it, but they never got the money raised and, as late as 2006, things were still the same. Although I will be going back some time this month for the parish’s 100th Anniversary as I’m curious to see how things look.
Interestingly enough, we have some Polish priests in our diocese who do not look very kindly on the Notre Dame liturgy department. A couple of them are from the school of JPII and do not like what they’ve seen coming out of ND.
I think the only rare exception that I’ve seen is that our new diocesan director of Divine Worship (a priest) has his PhD from Notre Dame. He does okay on quite a few things, but has some rather strange ideas about others (EHMCs still approach altar during the Agnus Dei, among items, and having kids come to the altar during the Offertory for a blessing,

, a practice he retained from the previous administrator ).
There was something rather odd that happened for two Holy Thursdays in a row. When my PV served as the original rector, before the second administrator took over, we had the altar of repose in the back chapel. In 2006 and again, this year, all the cathedral had was stripped linens (which is supposed to happen); however, instead of placing our Lord in the Tabernacle, they had the ciborium out on the side altar (Marian side) with a candle next to it. From what I was told, that was the altar of repose (the back chapel was not used) and that the bishop was okay with that. Still, it makes me wonder.
At least he’s gotten rid of the Mariachis, for which I am very grateful. From what one of the liturgical musicians tells me, he does seem to have an allergy to Latin.
Other than the foibles, however, he’s been pretty good and is working with my dad to correct some very serious problems.