"WHERE'S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President."

  • Thread starter Thread starter a_priori
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Scott_Lafrance said:
you know as well as I do that being baptized only opens the door. Being Christian, by biblical definition, means “a follower of Christ”. That should be apparent in his words and in his deeds. In those two areas, evidence of his faith are sorely lacking.

I quote Christ, “You are the salt of the earth, the light of the world. What use is salt if it looses its taste? …who hides a light under a basket? He who has the light will put it on a stand so that everyone in the house may see.”
Click to expand...
Right on, if baptism was all that was needed, we could just drag them in from the streets and dunk them…He changes you from the inside out…We are know by our fruits…He desires us to be hot/passionate with our faith…To have our lamps filled and trimmed awaiting His appearing…
 
TMC said:
What difference would that make?
Click to expand...
Well.ll.l. If it was listed as Kenyan…BOTH Parents would be listed as non-americans - now wouldn’t they?
Why would a mistake by his mother 50 years ago mean anything now?
Click to expand...
That, is a good question…have you asked Mr Obama?
 
TMC said:
What difference would that make? Why would a mistake by his mother 50 years ago mean anything now?
Click to expand...
See, this is what we don’t want. To be treated as Group 2 by Group 3. Speculations of his mother being Kenyan put one in group 2.
 
Hiskid1973 said:
Right on, if baptism was all that was needed, we could just drag them in from the streets and dunk them…He changes you from the inside out…We are know by our fruits…He desires us to be hot/passionate with our faith…To have our lamps filled and trimmed awaiting His appearing…
Click to expand...
It also says, “look to the log in your own eye before pointing out the splinter in another’s eye.”
 
qui_est_ce said:
It also says, “look to the log in your own eye before pointing out the splinter in another’s eye.”
Click to expand...
That’s correct…I’ts not for me to judge someone’s salvation…We are allowed to observe…
 
qui_est_ce said:
See, this is what we don’t want. To be treated as Group 2 by Group 3. Speculations of his mother being Kenyan put one in group 2.
Click to expand...
Not necessarily. 🙂

I am not in group 2 - I’m presenting possibilities - Possibilities ONLY exist because of Mr Obama’s direct actions / non-actions in addressing this.
 
Scott_Lafrance said:
Not a judge, just a fruit inspector. 😉
Click to expand...
I agree, but Obama is not claiming to be Catholic. He attended UCC. He adheres by UCC doctrine. I think his fruits would be better discussed in another thread. This thread is about his BC.
 
kimmielittle said:
Well.ll.l. If it was listed as Kenyan…BOTH Parents would be listed as non-americans - now wouldn’t they?

That, is a good question…have you asked Mr Obama?
Click to expand...
I am asking you - you seem to think it would make some difference, what difference would it make? Of course this is a completely unsubstantiated hypothetical based on nothing, but even if your speculation were true, I don’t see it as making any difference whatsoever.
 
TMC said:
I am asking you - you seem to think it would make some difference, what difference would it make? Of course this is a completely unsubstantiated hypothetical based on nothing, but even if your speculation were true, I don’t see it as making any difference whatsoever.
Click to expand...
You are right about that one.

What could be on Obama’s bc that would make any difference at all?
 
TMC said:
I am asking you - you seem to think it would make some difference, what difference would it make? Of course this is a completely unsubstantiated hypothetical based on nothing, but even if your speculation were true, I don’t see it as making any difference whatsoever.
Click to expand...
We don’t know why Mr. Obama seems** embarrassed of / by transparency.**. Have you asked Mr Obama?

If you read my past posts - I’m not a “birther”.
 
Scott_Lafrance said:
you know as well as I do that being baptized only opens the door. Being Christian, by biblical definition, means “a follower of Christ”. That should be apparent in his words and in his deeds. In those two areas, evidence of his faith are sorely lacking.

I quote Christ, “You are the salt of the earth, the light of the world. What use is salt if it looses its taste? …who hides a light under a basket? He who has the light will put it on a stand so that everyone in the house may see.”
Click to expand...
Obama professes to be a Christian and we should give him the respect of accepting that statement. That does not mean that we cannot comment on the fact that there is for a little that he is done during his administration to lead one to believe that he is a Christian or that he really adheres any faith at all., but then I think you can say that about most presidents in my lifetime with the exception of Jimmy Carter and George W. Bush.
 
kimmielittle said:
We don’t know why Mr. Obama seems** embarrassed of / by transparency.**. Have you asked Mr Obama?
Click to expand...
I think that’s the point. Obama has been asked, and his reply is paying lawyers to squash the answers and paint the questioners as “birthers.”
 
kimmielittle said:
We don’t know why Mr. Obama seems** embarrassed of / by transparency.**. Have you asked Mr Obama?

If you read my past posts - I’m not a “birther”.
Click to expand...
OK, so why did you bring up your speculations about the birth certificate if you are unwilling to say why it would matter.

You keep saying you are not a birther. What does “birther” mean to you? I understand it to mean someone that doubts that Obama was born in Hawaii.
 
qui_est_ce said:
I think that’s the point. Obama has been asked, and his reply is paying lawyers to squash the answers and paint the questioners as “birthers.”
Click to expand...
ABSOLUTELY!!! 👍👍

A Repost of mine:
Some people seem to think that “Appeals to Dismiss” or “Denied” " Dismissed" are somehow vindication .
Click to expand...
Actually, they are not.
Click to expand...
Rule 36
Click to expand...
Quote:(3) Time to Respond; Effect of Not Responding.
Click to expand...
A matter is admitted unless, within 30 days after being served, the party to whom the request is directed serves on the requesting party a written answer or objection addressed to the matter and signed by the party or its attorney. A shorter or longer time for responding may be stipulated to under Rule 29 or be ordered by the court.
Click to expand...
(4) Answer.
Click to expand...
If a matter is not admitted, the answer must specifically deny it or state in detail why the answering party cannot truthfully admit or deny it. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the matter; and when good faith requires that a party qualify an answer or deny only a part of a matter, the answer must specify the part admitted and qualify or deny the rest. The answering party may assert lack of knowledge or information as a reason for failing to admit or deny only if the party states that it has made reasonable inquiry and that the information it knows or can readily obtain is insufficient to enable it to admit or deny.
Click to expand...
law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule36.htm
Click to expand...
Meaning 30 days after served an unanswered claim - it becomes an admission of claim. Or Solid.
Click to expand...
Dismissal doesn’t address the Claims made.
Click to expand...
Mr Obama’s Crew doesn’t want the average person to know this.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top