T
TradionalWay
Guest
Which angles are accepted by the church?
Right, acute, obtuse and straight.Which angles are accepted by the church?
Thanks, Leon.We might note that the only archangels the Church recognizes as such are Michael, Gabriel, and Raphael.
Uriel, etc., were stated to be not archangels by Pope St. Zachary, I believe.
Right, acute, obtuse and straight.![]()
No problem, and maybe… I’m not sure and don’t want to give unreliable info!Thanks, Leon.
If they weren’t Archangels, they would be Ordinary Angels (albeit named ones), right?
As far as I am aware, there are nine choirs of angels made up of groups of three. I know of three named Archangels: Michael, Raphael and Gabriel. The choirs comprise:Which angles are accepted by the church?
We’re only talking about the named ones in Scripture, aren’t we?“The practice of assigning names to the Holy Angels should be discouraged, except in the cases of Gabriel, Raphael and Michael whose names are contained in Holy Scripture.”
– Directory on Popular Piety and the Liturgy, no. 217 (2001)
Right. The Church rejected complementary, supplementary, vertical, alternate interior, alternate exterior, and corresponding. However, the Church is still discerning on angle bisector and perpendicular lines.Right, acute, obtuse and straight.![]()
And the Eastern Catholic Churches have a different theological understanding of this.Right. The Church rejected complementary, supplementary, vertical, alternate interior, alternate exterior, and corresponding. However, the Church is still discerning on angle bisector and perpendicular lines.
Right. The Church rejected complementary, supplementary, vertical, alternate interior, alternate exterior, and corresponding.
What have you against isosceles triangles may I ask? They can’t help the way they were born.
I’m not sure what you mean here.We’re only talking about the named ones in Scripture, aren’t we?
They’d be totally in favour of vertical angles, surely, as don’t they stand for Holy Communion ? (I believe it’s been mentioned once or twice).And the Eastern Catholic Churches have a different theological understanding of this.
Your quote refers to the practice of individuals naming angels, particularly guardian angels. The angels that have been named in this thread are named in the Bible.I’m not sure what you mean here.
I was thinking it but you beat me to the post… :whacky:Right, acute, obtuse and straight.![]()
Not Remiel, Saraqael, et al.Your quote refers to the practice of individuals naming angels, particularly guardian angels. The angels that have been named in this thread are named in the Bible.
Ah, yes! I’d forgotten that I’d posted them. My mistake.Not Remiel, Saraqael, et al.
You beat me to it, and the others who said you beat them to it, including the poster who listed the other angles, beat me to it, too!Right, acute, obtuse and straight.![]()