The NAB study bibles are fine. I use the Oxford Press Study Bible. This is the version used at Mass. If the United States Council of Catholic Bishops call it the approved version of the Bible. It is good enough for me.
The Ignatius Scott Hahn version charges you individually for the books of the Old Testament. Scott Hahn refuses to sell the OT as a single volume so he can charge you $10 per book. A $200 - $300 OT. I don’t think so.
I purchased Hahns NT, and it is not superior to the 3 or 4 versions of the NAB Study Bible that I have used or seen.
So if you like paying for Scott Hahn’s vacation home in the South of France, go with Ignatious.
If you like using the preferred version of the United States Catholic Church, go NAB.
Scott Hahn’s kids can go to public school.
:tsktsk:
Don’t know if you’re being sarcastic, but that is a fairly gratuitous slam on a very good (and orthodox) Catholic apologist. If he were asking for luxury gifts on Amazon*, or saying that God would take him away if you didn’t send him money**, then that would be justified. I’ve never seen him do anything of that sort.
Scott Hahn’s NT is definitely superior to the NAB because (a) he goes further out of the way to explain traditional Catholic concepts, such as Mary as Queen Mother and Ark of the Covenant, and (b) the RSV-2CE source text is better than the NAB’s (for example, it has “virgin” at Isaiah 7: 14, unlike the NAB-RE and RSV-first edition).
I would definitely recommend the RSV-2CE as a base text. The Jerusalem is also good, but more speculative (plus, the edition with full notes is out of print.) If you’re into something more old-school, you can find terrific “Catholic Action” (Confraternity-Douay) bibles from the 1940s, in fairly good condition, on Amazon or Ebay.
On another topic: I’m glad that this thread is staying civil and providing good suggestions. There once was a time when any suggestion of the NAB, NRSV or even RSV - First Edition was met with comments like “why do you want to read the Bible in English?”, “all you need is the Clementine Vulgate”, “the NRSV is Satanic” (actually, apart from inclusive language, it has very good OT-NT correlations), and even “Douay-Rheims 1582 Edition ONLY!”

I’m glad we’ve moved on from this.
- if you’re curious, Google is your friend
** Pat Robertson