R
Rau
Guest
Preventing a pregnancy is a goal, not an act. It can be justly pursued. Contraception is an act - a means - which the Church explains is a wrong act.Murder and theft I consider serious sins, not preventing a pregnancy.
Preventing a pregnancy is a goal, not an act. It can be justly pursued. Contraception is an act - a means - which the Church explains is a wrong act.Murder and theft I consider serious sins, not preventing a pregnancy.
I did not mention Mr OnanOh please, give it a rest. The verse about onan that the Catholic church uses is just its interpretation . Onan was punished for not fulfilling the jewish law that required him to produce for hid dead brothers wife.
Quite frankly I dont care.To call truth and the virtue of Chastity (rejecting contraception is part of such) - evil or nonsense is not good. Such is rather out of Orwell’s 1984.
And the Gospel and Truths of the Faith do not have an expiration date.
No you didnt but that is what the Catholic church refers to asvto whyvthe church is against contraception.I did not mention Mr Onan![]()
I am sorry to hear that.Quite frankly I dont care.
On this thread, most people arguing for contraception to be allowed are non-Catholics.Murder and theft I consider serious sins, not preventing a pregnancy.
Makes you think about how many of us are sinners and our fate. A sobering thought. But not one we can answer.…
It looks like that the ideal of the Church is more and more removed from reality. But what I call “ideal” is not some distant goal we are trying to achieve, but these are the ground rules. Using contraception is a “grave sin” we are told and you are facing eternal damnation if you use it and don’t repent. And this rule cannot change, it will not change and it is infallible. How are we to take this seriously if the majority of Catholics simply ignores it?
What organisation, what country would function if the majority of its employees or citizens disobey the ground rules and laws?
Well im sorry I do not believe that I face damnation for using contraception. The church is totally out of touch. Glad I left it, all these ridgid man made rules.On this thread, most people arguing for contraception to be allowed are non-Catholics.
Most people arguing that contraception is a “grave sin” are Catholics, obviously with a conservative bend.
That leaves us with the paradox that the majority of Catholics do use contraceptives. The dissonance is even greater when it comes to receiving communion with all the restrictions imposed by the Church.
It looks like that the ideal of the Church is more and more removed from reality. But what I call “ideal” is not some distant goal we are trying to achieve, but these are the ground rules. Using contraception is a “grave sin” we are told and you are facing eternal damnation if you use it and don’t repent. And this rule cannot change, it will not change and it is infallible. How are we to take this seriously if the majority of Catholics simply ignores it?
What organisation, what country would function if the majority of its employees or citizens disobey the ground rules and laws?
It is no paradox that many Catholics do not follow the Teachings of the Church - such is called “ignorance” or “conscience not formed according to the Truth” or “the influence of the surrounding culture” or simply Sin etc…That leaves us with the paradox that the majority of Catholics do use contraceptives.
I believe the relevant encyclicals speak to a little more than Onan! But on that point, do you see Onan’s sin as nothing other than disobedience? Why then did he go to the lady’s room? To her bed? Why did he engage in sex! Sex he ended in a contraceptive act, presumably with s bit of masturbation thrown in!Oh please, give it a rest. The verse about onan that the Catholic church uses is just its interpretation . Onan was punished for not fulfilling the jewish law that required him to produce for hid dead brothers wife.
Conservative?Most people arguing that contraception is a “grave sin” are Catholics, obviously with a conservative bend.
Why is sex in and of itself so wrong to the RCC?I believe the relevant encyclicals speak to a little more than Onan! But on that point, do you see Onan’s sin as nothing other than disobedience? Why then did he go to the lady’s room? To her bed? Why did he engage in sex! Sex he ended in a contraceptive act, presumably with s bit of masturbation thrown in!
Is it known with certainty that this rule is infallible and cannot change?Using contraception is a “grave sin” we are told and you are facing eternal damnation if you use it and don’t repent. And this rule cannot change, it will not change and it is infallible.
I think you are wrong to reject statistical sampling.It is no paradox that many Catholics do not follow the Teachings of the Church - such is called “ignorance” or “conscience not formed according to the Truth” or “the influence of the surrounding culture” or simply Sin etc…
There is no surprise in this current world and culture that many do not.
I do not say majority for as I noted:
One survey or another or even another 3 - is just that. "a survey’
It is Not a counting of all Catholics…
How many “surveys” are done about who will win an election!!??
And that person the majority said they voted for – looses…
Such would be an example of the line “statistics lie”.
And even if it should ever happen in the future?
What then?
Even if the majority of persons on this earth thought the earth was flat?
Does that make it so?
Even if the majority of persons on this earth thought infanticide is good?
Does that make it so?
Even if the majority of persons on this earth thought contraception was good?
Does that make it so?
Even if the majority of person on this earth thought theft was good?
Does that make it so?
“Truth is not determined by a majority vote”
~ Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (later Pope Benedict XVI)
If it doesnt specificy “Ex Cathedra” explicitly before the statement, then it is not infallible, accorsing to what I have learned in these forums.Is it known with certainty that this rule is infallible and cannot change?
Already explained myself.I think you are wrong to reject statistical sampling.
Yes the Truth there will not change.cannot change?
Such farcical “reasoning” is precisely what Jesus of Nazareth condemned. But why should they care what God mandates?Burdock #434
I cannot see c how preventing a pregnancy is sinful,go forthcand multiply didnt mean for us to have one child after another. People have to take their finances, size of house etc into consideration. Its absolutely ridiculous.
#466
The church is totally out of touch. Glad I left it, all these ridgid man made rules.
Hans W #454
How are we to take this seriously if the majority of Catholics simply ignores it?
What organisation, what country would function if the majority of its employees or citizens disobey the ground rules and laws?