Which decade do you wish you could live in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DlandFan06
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is exactly the sort of question that makes me want to over-think my options.

On the one hand (assuming that time travel is involved in returning to the past, as opposed to simply being born earlier and losing my memories of this time period), I’d probably be tempted to go back in time and attempt to alter history. Granted, I probably wouldn’t be able to do much without resources, but if I went back far enough I could revolutionize medicine simply by introducing the concepts of sanitation and hand-washing. Or write a novel that belongs to a genre that hasn’t been invented yet, or something. Anything that could be accomplished with little more than knowledge and a bit of effort. That is, of course, assuming I don’t get sick and die, and the tradeoff is that I would lose access to things I really like- like TV, the internet, year-round access to fruit and vegetables, ease of travel… not to mention I’d have no access to anti-depressants, which would make changing the past (or even surviving) considerably harder. I don’t think I’m really crazy enough to try something like that, but if I actually had the option, I’d be tempted.

Now, on the other hand, part of me is tempted to leap forward a few decades into the future, just because I know there will be more modern conveniences in 2020 or 2030, as well as a much larger amount of art and media to consume. Doubtless the video games and movies will look much prettier. But honestly, there are probably enough good stories out there to occupy me for the rest of my life, video games are already very pretty, and leaping into the future seems like quite a gamble. I’m sure societal attitudes will improve in some ways and get worse in others, but I’m not sure I want to skip going there.

So aside from my weird desire to smash history off its decided path and my selfish desire for more entertainment/art/media and better technology, I think I actually like living when I am. I am a product of my era. The things I’ve been exposed to have shaped my personality a great deal, and without them, I wouldn’t be me. Besides, this is an exciting time to be alive. There’s more fiction being produced than ever before. Technology is constantly improving. Medicine is constantly improving. We have the internet, which is important to me; it allows me to learn a ton outside of formal education, and allows me to access points of view that are unlike those of my real-life social circle. Most of what I know of Catholic teaching, I learned via the internet.

Of course there are cultural battles to be fought, but that has always been the case. If I stay here I’ll have to contend with a society that accepts abortion; if I go back two hundred years, I’ll have to contend with a society that accepts slavery. If I go forward, I have no idea what I’ll have to contend with, but I’m sure it will be equally heinous.

So yeah. At the end of the day, I think I prefer life in 2014. It may not be the best decade, but it’s the one I’m in right now, and if I don’t like it, I figure it’s my responsibility to change things for the better. 🤷
 
The current one. It’s very easy to reminisce over the good old days and gloss over the downsides, or overlook the good things about today. I can still listen to all the music from the prior decades, and I can youtube the videos/audios of folks performing all the songs I enjoy- including recordings of the old blues artists back in the day …
👍👍
 
You have a better view of the american public than I do. They will vote because they want to see the first woman president. Obama did not win because people knew what he stood for or what he wanted to do. He won because pop culture wanted him to. Same here. It is a slam dunk.

The only way the republicans win is Condi Rice who is pro choice…🤷
Apparently, you have not read that H.C.'s favorability ratings are upside down. She is seen as part of the current administration - she was Secretary of State - and does not have one accomplishment to her credit. She was a “slam dunk” in 2008 and lost in the first poll in Iowa which stunned everyone. Seeing that Obama has lost almost all of his core constituency, I find it very hard to believe that these same people are going to just blindly vote for Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president after 8 years of completely stagnant job creation and economic recovery. And Condi Rice would be a long shot. It is the republicans race to lose. They better have a better candidate than her.
 
It would be nice to go back to some previous decade knowing what I know now. Endless possibilities there! But just to live in some other time, I don’t see where it would necessarily be any better than it potentially is now.
 
Apparently, you have not read that H.C.'s favorability ratings are upside down. She is seen as part of the current administration - she was Secretary of State - and does not have one accomplishment to her credit. She was a “slam dunk” in 2008 and lost in the first poll in Iowa which stunned everyone. Seeing that Obama has lost almost all of his core constituency, I find it very hard to believe that these same people are going to just blindly vote for Hillary Clinton to be the first woman president after 8 years of completely stagnant job creation and economic recovery. And Condi Rice would be a long shot. It is the republicans race to lose. They better have a better candidate than her.
Well I think it is the media’s job to convince people there is a story. Polls mean nothing and have been completely wrong before (Bush) There is no ratings by saying “hey that election 2 years from now is already over…” I remember when Obama won how everyone thought we would not know until the next day. It was such a landslide that we knew in a few hours.

A large part of Obama being elected had to do with the culture and media wanting to be on the “right side of an issue” People wanted to vote for the first black president because they wanted to see history. Same here. Hillary would win just based on the fact that we want to be a generation of firsts. And the gay marriage issue is proof. Such a small segment of the population yet is seems to be the “human rights” issue of the day. Even from people who are not gay, or who don’t even know a gay person.🤷
 
I wouldn’t want to live any further back. God decided to create me to live here, and now-now’s therefore great for me.

I wouldn’t want to live pre-antibiotics, or pre-modern safety standards.

People in the 80’s were surely complaining about their time the same way people complain about ours. Ever read Amos, or Isaiah? Humanity has been depraved since the Fall, it isn’t just a modern invention.

(Remember, in 70’s there was Roe v Wade)
 
I say the 1970s, not for politics or music or anything like that (certainly not style, har har), but because it would afford the opportunity to see my grandparents, aunts, and uncles more in their prime. My cousins are all far older than me (they have children closer to my age than I am to them, but too young for me to relate to), so it would have been a different way of knowing them, too.

Beyond that, 1870s, because mind is a mind of the 19th century. Give me trains, telegraphs, and hilariously big bicycles, please.
 
Give me trains, telegraphs, and hilariously big bicycles, please.
Only if that includes vampires, werewolves, alongside a certain parallel dimension that can only be accessed via rabbit holes or looking glass. Heck, while we’re at it let’s throw in some cowboys too. 😛 Oh and lot’s not forget steampunk submarines, dinosaurs living close to the center of the Earth, and stitching together your own intelligent zombie via lightning and rotting body parts.

:whacky:
 
The 1950’s, definitely. Beautiful - if inefficient - cars, cheap gas, great pop music, America was respected across the world in its post-WW2 might, just enough technology, common sense was still in vogue, being knee-jerk litigious wasn’t, the media told us what we needed to know without telling us what to think, political correctness hadn’t been invented yet, churches of all stripes were respected and had cultural and social influence, higher education was truly a search for knowledge and not an exercise in liberal thought control, a man could hold a door for a lady without being accused of patronizing her, strength was “in” and “sensitivity,” not so much. You could say “Merry Christmas” in public and not wonder who you might be “offending.” And “Black Friday” hadn’t been invented yet.
 
If I had a lot of money, wouldn’t matter.

If I had no money and could pick where (I like modern pluming) then the 70’s in the United States.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top