P
Penitent60
Guest
I got the impression it was implicated with those as there was a comma missing. Thank you for clearing that up.
No comment on sarcastic, but you always seemed reasonably direct and blunt to me. Note that I in no way say or intend to imply that those are bad things.Sarcastic, direct, and blunt-spoken are a foreign language to me.
Stunning place for a vacation. But too many tin foil hats on the locals for me to even think about living there.I’ve looked into that area, and there’s no nice way to say this, but CDA looks a little depressing
I am more direct and blunt on this forum, because matters of faith and morality are at stake, and nothing less will do. My exchanges out here in the community rarely pertain to either of these things — usually just retail transactions and pleasantries with neighbors. The “Southern way” is rarely to express outright displeasure and to be polite and gently-spoken in all of your dealings, even if the state of your mind is otherwise. Some would call this phony and inauthentic, I call it a way to get through life smoothly without making enemies unnecessarily.HomeschoolDad:
No comment on sarcastic, but you always seemed reasonably direct and blunt to me. Note that I in no way say or intend to imply that those are bad things.Sarcastic, direct, and blunt-spoken are a foreign language to me.
I’ve heard many nice things, and hope to make my way up there for a visit one of these days. I do know there are a lot of various flavors of traditionalist Catholics in eastern Washington and northern Idaho, as well as other people whose politics, religion, and lifestyle skew more right-wing than the nation as a whole. Some are more extreme than others. A lot would enter into deciding to move there (or anywhere else for that matter).HomeschoolDad:
Stunning place for a vacation. But too many tin foil hats on the locals for me to even think about living there.I’ve looked into that area, and there’s no nice way to say this, but CDA looks a little depressing
No, my mistake.Did the OP indicate that he doesn’t?[
It is true that some prelates dissent from Church doctrine. However, they are very rare and hard to come across.There is the ideal world, and then there is the real world.
You are very right. Especially the bolded part. If I ever came across as saying that he doesn’t have a right to prefer the Extraordinary Form, then I was wrong and I apolgise. I would probably attend the EF regularly if I could.Yes, and they have a fair amount of discretion over HOW to best uphold this faith… and the OP has discretion over where to live and what forms of liturgy to pursue.
Oh, I am intimately familiar with that way. Born in TN, a short stay in FL as a preschooler, GA until joining the Navy, and either stationed or living in MD, TN, VA, and GA except for a few months in CA and a few years in WA and Japan. So basically Southern born and bred.The “Southern way”
It is a very beautiful and pleasant way of life, as long as you don’t challenge people’s basic assumptions, but that much would be true anywhere — there aren’t many people who go through life saying “I may not have all the answers, or I might just be dead wrong about this or that, I would really welcome it, if someone were to come along one of these days, challenge me, and improve me”.HomeschoolDad:
Oh, I am intimately familiar with that way. Born in TN, a short stay in FL as a preschooler, GA until joining the Navy, and either stationed or living in MD, TN, VA, and GA except for a few months in CA and a few years in WA and Japan. So basically Southern born and bred.The “Southern way”
They’ve reached a compromise in my area whereby there’s a Latin Mass offered monthly at a particular parish. It’s well attended, and the people who so desire get their Latin Mass fix, but the OF vernacular Masses remain well-attended.The reasoning of some of these bishops is because they don’t want to hurt the personal parish they created. They would rather create 1 or more regional parishes dedicated to the Latin Mass so robust communities can develop.
Per canon law that is abuse of power by Bishop and would not go too well with Vatican. If Bishop would prohibit celebrating Versus Populum Masses, it would be similar stuff. Not the same though, because current Rite of Mass is built upon being served Ad Orientem. Hence if someone outlaws Versus Populum, he is denying Priests rightful choice they are presented. If someone outlaws Ad Orientem, he is denying normative structure of the Mass as presented by Paul VI and Vatican II, therefore putting himself above Ecumenical Council and Pope who became Saint.Here he would.
100% true. But I was taking the position that an altar rail can be installed inexpensively, esp of made from prefabricate wood or a metal gate.Each Diocese has their own level, however, there is a threshold where expenditures must have Diocesan approval, even for repairs or cosmetic renovations, even if one parishioner promises to give all the money to cover it.
Who is “they”? Why only monthly (which is better than never)? Does the priest travel from another location or assigned to a different parish? Just curious.phil19034:
They’ve reached a compromise in my area whereby there’s a Latin Mass offered monthly at a particular parish. It’s well attended, and the people who so desire get their Latin Mass fix, but the OF vernacular Masses remain well-attended.The reasoning of some of these bishops is because they don’t want to hurt the personal parish they created. They would rather create 1 or more regional parishes dedicated to the Latin Mass so robust communities can develop.
I’m pretty sure you know who makes these decisions, the Diocese. I haven’t asked why, by I’m guessing that it’s for the very reason you cited upthread.Who is “they”?
A new, regular TLM may siphon off parishioners from elsewhere.The reasoning of some of these bishops is because they don’t want to hurt the personal parish they created.
Well… sometimes the “they” are the local parish and the group asking for the mass. I just wanted to make sure I was understandingphil19034:
I’m pretty sure you know who makes these decisions, the Diocese. I haven’t asked why, by I’m guessing that it’s for the very reason you cited upthread.Who is “they”?
What you say may be true for your country, but please keep in mind that your experience is limited to a fairly small country—tiny, in fact, compared to the US—and upholding the same Apostolic doctrines can mean wide disparity in other aspects of parish life. The United States is many, many times larger, and the sizes of the diocesan jurisdictions vary widely in geography, population numbers and makeup, as well as in the personal preferences of the bishops.I think it is unwise to characterise any diocese as being more traditional.
We are not like the Anglicans. All our bishops uphold the same Apostolic Faith.