K
kage_ar
Guest
By removing the misleading word “annulment” from this discussion, perhaps the Church’s teaching will be more clear.when one gets a divorce, is there remorse, or since there has been an annulment, God overlooks the marriage sacrament, isn’t it by the law, set by God after all?
Two people can have a wedding, they may live together and have children. They may not have ever contracted a valid marriage in the eyes of God at that wedding.
The Church can review that wedding, interview the couple and witnesses, spend time in prayer and determine that the wedding that took place was null and void. They then issue a Decree of Nullity.
There never was a sacrament, God never joined the couple together.
In a true valid wedding, God does join together what no man can put asunder. What we know is that not every wedding is a valid marriage in the eyes of God.
Think of two actors in a play. There is a wedding scene in the play, this couple of actors stands up and says all the vows, but, we know it is not a valid wedding.
Or what if two people have a wedding, but, one of them was forced into it. They did not consent. That would not be a valid marriage in the eyes of God.
Does that make the teaching any clearer?