P
Prodigal_Son1
Guest
Putting Joseph Smith into the same league as Moses or St. Paul is laughable.
Putting Joseph Smith into the same league as Moses or St. Paul is laughable.
Really?
M’goodness, you have a very low opinion of every single Mormon if you think we honestly stick to a belief system we 'know" is wrong. I mean, really…why would any of us do that?
Well, first it might be that they don’t want to be snubbed by their families and they would be. Then, of course, they don’t want to lose their friends. And of course, there’s the losing their jobs-- should the employer be Mormon. Also, I’m certain that the people don’t exactly look forward to having their reputations ruined–the LDS don’t exactly even consider that there might be a valid reason for becoming “ex”–they simply think that the person who is “ex” committed some unthinkable sin. Also, well maybe the “exs” here can shed light, is there still fear of being called an apostate without hope of salvation?I mean, really…why would any of us do that?
I rather think that your church pulled Romney aside and suggested that the “secrets” of your Temple (which are never supposed to be divulged) would be at risk of being divulged if Romney continued. I mean, don’t you have “covenants” and all and aren’t you supposed to promise (on pain of death) to give all “blessings” to the LDS?look what happened to Mitt Romney; he wanted to be President rather badly, y’know, and one of the biggest reasons he didn’t get nominated was because he was a Mormon.
Umm–from what I hear, he brought his troubles on himself. Illegallly taking to wive other men’s wives, their sisters and all, having himself crowned king, ordering destruction of property. Also believe he had actually tried to escape…and then there was that gun battle in jail…Even Joseph Smith went through some very nasty times because he didn’t change his beliefs. After all, he wasn’t just murdered–he was tarred and feathered (as a direct result of which his infant son died), he was jailed many times, beaten…he certainly died broke.
Well, you have convinced me, Jesse. John Smith was definitely not a prophet.I believe you are going off subject. We are talking about why you accept John Smith, and I don’t think you have any evidence of such things??
You know very well who Jesse was talking about.Well, you have convinced me, Jesse. John Smith was definitely not a prophet.
Perhaps…but that’s precisely the same league we believe he IS in.Putting Joseph Smith into the same league as Moses or St. Paul is laughable.
Dunno. Very effectively duped, I guess. It would take some very spectacular mental gymnastics for most non-mormons to swallow most mormon beliefs.![]()
All thirteen million of us?Well, first it might be that they don’t want to be snubbed by their families and they would be. Then, of course, they don’t want to lose their friends.
The vast majority of Mormons are minorities in their communities. That is, they don’t live in Utah. In fact, most Mormons live outside the USA. Thus the VAST majority of Mormons work for non-Mormon employers…and in most cases, those employers would not only NOT fire a Mormon for leaving his religion, he might even get praised/promoted. Mormons are, after all, considered to be pretty wierd.And of course, there’s the losing their jobs-- should the employer be Mormon. Also, I’m certain that the people don’t exactly look forward to having their reputations ruined–the LDS don’t exactly even consider that there might be a valid reason for becoming “ex”–they simply think that the person who is “ex” committed some unthinkable sin. Also, well maybe the “exs” here can shed light, is there still fear of being called an apostate without hope of salvation?
…and I hear the black helicopters…I rather think that your church pulled Romney aside and suggested that the “secrets” of your Temple (which are never supposed to be divulged) would be at risk of being divulged if Romney continued. I mean, don’t you have “covenants” and all and aren’t you supposed to promise (on pain of death) to give all “blessings” to the LDS?
“having himself crowned king?” Wow. True, I think that Obama thought that being elected to the presidency was akin to a crowning, but the last time I heard, running for the office was not considered a coronation.Umm–from what I hear, he brought his troubles on himself. Illegallly taking to wive other men’s wives, their sisters and all, having himself crowned king, ordering destruction of property. Also believe he had actually tried to escape…and then there was that gun battle in jail…
Yeah, kinda like getting hooked on crystal meth.You could be very right. After all, curiously enough, when a non-Mormon begins to believe, he very rapidly becomes NOT a 'non-Mormon." He gets baptised and becomes a Mormon.
You don’t have to be ignorant to be duped, look at how many very intelligent people were duped by Adolf Hitler and …Joseph Smith.
Oh, well, I DO believe that Joseph was a prophet. I certainly understand that you don’t think he was, though. I just think that it’s reasonable to expect someone who has such definite opinions about the man to get his name right.You know very well who Jesse was talking about.
John,Joseph…whatever. Joseph Smith was most certainly not a prophet either, except in his own mind.
I’ve been away (from CAF and this thread) but this is a very enlightening statement. This is one of the things Jesus actually says in the Book of John. John the Baptist testified to the things of Christ. The very scripture testifies to Christ’s message. Everything is in harmony. The BoM is disharmonious. The only witness is Joseph Smith. According to Jewish law, it takes two witnesses for something to be valid.Set aside all of the issues you may have with the LDS faith. Set aside everything you know aout Joseph Smith. Set all that aside for one second. And, if you are Mormon, set that aside, too.
Now, in the most non-specific terms possible, why should ANYONE accept anything that anyone else said was told to them by God or an Angel when no one else was told the same thing?
No. I don’t think you know you are wrong. I think that is the sad part. If you knew, you might repent. If Mormons knew the Bible, then they would know the truth. They would not have “Joseph Smith revised and added scriptures” versions of the Bible. But a revised truth is not the truth. A truth with added parts is not the truth. Truth is the truth unedited, unrevised, unmanipulated, unamputated, unamended. That truth is the truth that Mormons choose to ignore, choose to revise, choose to manipulate, choose to amend. The knowing you have things wrong comes from the knowing that your faith actively did those thing. When a Mormon accepts those manipulations that is a “knowing…” Some might not understand it at first. Some might be born into it. Some might be too far from light that they only see the shadow puppet and actually believe that what they are viewing is a real bunny. They are not seeing the truth. They are seeing a mere shadow. Little manipulations of the truth to look right, but when you have seen the truth, your understanding of a shadow puppet is made clear. Mormons are not seeing the light, they are seeing the darkness.All thirteen million of us?
Remember, Mr. Z claimed that ALL of us 'know we are wrong." That is, that all 13 to 14 million of us are living hypocrites. How reasonable is that claim? How would you react to a claim that all Catholics actually know that Catholicism is wrong? It is a ludicrous claim. I know that you don’t believe we are correct, but please do us the courtesy of understanding that WE believe what we claim we do.
I am amazed so many Christians follow Glen Beck. Talk about being brainwashed.Did you miss the part about Harry Reid being a Mormon?
Sadly, this is the same argument I see used against Catholics at CARM.There are not 13-14 million mormons…that is a myth propagated by the fact the LDS takes this count from the number of people in their member database. If this church loses contact with someone they continue counting them as “members” until their 100th birthday.
Statistics show at best only about 1/2 of this number are actually "active"mormons, with other statistics showing only about 1/3 of LDS adults are “temple worthy”.
hosemonkey;6383722:
I don’t understand your point. When a non-Christian begins to believe, they are baptised and become a Christian. There is nothing unique about this.You could be very right. After all, curiously enough, when a non-Mormon begins to believe, he very rapidly becomes NOT a 'non-Mormon." He gets baptised and becomes a Mormon.
Funny how that happens.
The same argument is used against Baptists. They don’t remove people from their roles without a direct communication from the member that says “move my letter to so-and-so church” or “remove me from your roles” or “I have died.”Sadly, this is the same argument I see used against Catholics at CARM.![]()
You are certainly free to believe that the earth is flat. This, however does not make it so. Just as the earth has been proven to be round, so has Joseph Smith and the “religion” that he invented been proven to be fraudulent, very similar to Scientology, invented by L. Ron Hubbard.Oh, well, I DO believe that Joseph was a prophet. I certainly understand that you don’t think he was, though. I just think that it’s reasonable to expect someone who has such definite opinions about the man to get his name right.call it me being picky.
Theosis, I’m curious–do you mean that the argument is invalid? I don’t hang around at CARM so I don’t know what the specifics of what is said there. But I would indeed imagine that the number of practicing Catholics would be less than the number of baptized Catholics, same as with the LDS.Sadly, this is the same argument I see used against Catholics at CARM.![]()
Seeing as how the RCC doesn’t have a member database, I don’t how they could.Sadly, this is the same argument I see used against Catholics at CARM.![]()
I agree…the claim by Dianaiad wasn’t about this though. She was a claiming that there are 13-14 million mormons who are true believing mormons…more like half that, if even that, as that number includes non-baptized children under the age of 8.Theosis, I’m curious–do you mean that the argument is invalid? I don’t hang around at CARM so I don’t know what the specifics of what is said there. But I would indeed imagine that the number of practicing Catholics would be less than the number of baptized Catholics, same as with the LDS.
Personally I think it is a silly game, exaggerating the number of adherents. At one point in history I would imagine that a majority believed the world was flat–it didn’t make it true. Same with religion–a large number of adherents doesn’t make a faith true.