That goes back to an old arguement nobody I applied at for a job that would pay me enough to do all you say I should do hired me, so I’m dead in the water. medical costs too much for charities or churches to be a factor thesedays. Come up to 2009. That is 1909 thinking.
Yes, I seem to remember Jesus telling the five thousand that if they were too lazy or stupid not to have brought their own bread and fish then they certainly wouldn’t be having any of his.
Or you could have the government take less in taxes, pay less in insurance b/c the government could allow interstate competition, then you could give your money to a local charity who won’t waste it like a government beauracracy.
In a “democracy” who is Caesar?
Like anyother time in human history 1909 had its pluses and minuses. Yes family’s stuck together better in 1909. Yes more people went to church at that time. But on the otherhand Many areas of the western USA were still crawling with maurauding bandits, and still locked up people with conditions such as autism, and downs syndrome Many children were being disgigured by polio too. The operation to remove kidneystones didn’t exist yet, so I’d likely be dead, and the operation to reomove the appendix didn’t exist yet, so my dad would be dead from an apendicitis. You bet 1909 was great!
There is nothing wrong with the way things were in 1909. .
What if those other kids moved out of state for jobs?
I have a daughter with sickle-cell anemia and a wife with bone degeneration who has already had one hip replacement, and I would gladly lose all of my worldly possessions to save either of them if I had to. What I have or own do not define who I am, and I am capable of rebuilding anything no matter what goes wrong. If I am too old, my other kids will have to take care of me. There is nothing wrong with the way things were in 1909. That’s why your supposed to have more than 2.11 children.
If we could get national insurance and keep taxes around 25%, you might not see such resistance. I already pay almost 30% of my income in taxes and pay for healthcare on top of that. The National healthcare plan being proposed will cost me even more than that, even if I don’t participate in a public option or subsidized plan. In other words, I’ll pay more and get less. Our government has a very poor track record of fiscal responsibilty, especially in the part of healthcare it already manages (Medicare, veterans benefits, etc.)
Since you have the answer to everything, why don’t you answer the first post article I put up. What is the first family the article writes about supposed to do? I’m itching to hear your answer on that one. I susgest you be carefull on how you answer it. Iv’e got several possible answers you might use and am ready shoot any of them down easily in flames.
It’s propped up by one world governement insiders like the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. It won’t collapse on it’s own, it will be collapsed when the insiders determine its a good time to, and nothing will be able to stop them from doing it. So take advatage of it while you can.
Yeah, that’s it.
The government will always be Caeser, whether in a democracy or in a totalitarian government.
Ok Did you read my article I posted in the 1st post? What should those people do? Our society when it was originally concocted was based on the Swiss model. Now even Switzerland has a form of national healthcare. I think those people not loosing their fanny is a bit more important than the socialism debate.
This is the kind of approach to problem solving that results in bigger problems- and it is exactly the mentality that is driving this country into the ground…
With doing nothing we will have more cases like the article I put in the Op of this thread. Ruined lives. You better hope you never get an anurysm you life could be ruined too!
Too bad more people will have to die because of that mentality; its one thing to take that attitude when you have medical coverage, but when your on the other side of the fence and the tables are turned suddenly it becomes a priority.
I’ll say it again. It is the law of the land that the federal government has to fund the military. It doesn’t have to fund large scale health care for all.
That doesn’t change the fact that “doing nothing” is hardly the worst thing we could do.
It already has been done. It is the 1933 War powers act, which in effect had made the constitution null and void, proof" the excutive order’. If you want the constitution the law of the land again, repeal the 1933 war powers act and the 1935 finanial restorations acts.