Why are atheists so unhappy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RNRobert
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, **there is one common denominator amongst all criminals - they’re all moral relativists. ** Furthermore, moral relativism has become so pervasive in the West as a result of the atheistic/secular culture which has slowly overtaken society since the age of “Enlightement”. God bless.
Really? You have solid evidence for the bolded part of your statement?

Perhaps you should read about medieval Europe. Everyone at that time believed in God; everyone was a practising Jew, Catholic or muslim. Yet there were wars, atrocities, slaughter, injustice and yes, crime. If belief in God makes us good, medieval Europe should have been utopia.
 
Really? You have solid evidence for the bolded part of your statement?
Because if they believed/practiced moral absolutism they would not have committed the crimes they did.
Perhaps you should read about medieval Europe. Everyone at that time believed in God; everyone was a practising Jew, Catholic or muslim. Yet there were wars, atrocities, slaughter, injustice and yes, crime. If belief in God makes us good, medieval Europe should have been utopia.
Moral Absolutism was not under attack in medieval Europe as it is under attack now for the aforementioned reasons mentioned earlier. People have always to some extent practiced moral relativism but in a society that recognized moral absolutes, this changed with the advancement of atheistic/secular thought as we see more and more people deny the (logical) reality of moral absolutes.
 
no we feel this because we chose to you can only think of one thing at a time and you can think of good or bad but you need to make the choice. your thoughts become your reality if you think good thoughts you will be happy. i think your bible says “keep every thought captive” and this is why.

god douse not have empathy sadness and loss because those emotions lead to suffering and god is the absence of suffering.😃
Actually God is Love. Big difference. :D:D
 
Charles,
Oh and my ethical system has nothing to do with the bible. It is based on society.
Oh, and by the way I said “Christianity,” not the bible. Try to be a little more rigorous, Mr. Darwin.

But that is precisely my point, Charles. Society! What society have you been living in? The West? What’s the biggest influence on ethical development in the West for the last 2000 years? Christian philosophy, or, more recently, reaction against it. If not for Christianity your societal norms would be for rich men alone; slavery would be legal (and moral–just look at non-Christian cultures today); women would be property; science would be trapped into the cyclic philosophy that preceded Christianity; and you would likely be celebrating easter with the temple prostitutes. Even romance and chivalry would not exist without Christianity. It never did before. Mimetic violence would still be the norm, and not one of us would think any differently. Christ exposed the hidden truth behind the veil of cultural myths, however. Victims are never guilty. That set the West on a course for human rights.
Tell me how to do you know something is moral? Because god says so?
How do you know something is moral? Because society said so?
So if god told you to rape children would that make raping kids moral?
If society told you to kill Jews would that make it moral? It did in secular systems of the 20th century.
Who care about arguments for existence. The god of the OT is a twisted individual and even if it did exist, it is NOT worthy of my worship. I would be as well worshiping Hitler.
Your diatribe simply proves my case, and answers my question posed above. You are petulant, and angry like a spoiled child (or a faithful brown shirt). You admit yourself that you’d be “as well” in worshipping Hitler as God. You would make a proper ubermensche of the Third Reich.

By the way, I am not a “fun-de-mentalist”, but you may want to try your schtick on them. It may even work. 🤓
 
Actually, there is one common denominator amongst all criminals - they’re all moral relativists. Furthermore, moral relativism has become so pervasive in the West as a result of the atheistic/secular culture which has slowly overtaken society since the age of “Enlightement”. God bless.
Ah yes we should all miss those good old days of slavery, Puritan torture, Catholic inquisitions, religious superstition and paranoia, people basing their lives on bizarre mythology … wow I see your point (I feel so much more enlightened now :confused:)
 
Ah yes we should all miss those good old days of slavery, Puritan torture, Catholic inquisitions, religious superstition and paranoia, people basing their lives on bizarre mythology … wow I see your point (I feel so much more enlightened now :confused:)
I have a suggestion. When you post, ditch the sarcasm and ignorance. You aren’t helping your cause against God. For example, you should know that slavery was opposed by the Vatican, and participating in the slave trade in any capacity whatsoever would get you excommunicated. Study your history. In might cure you of the paranoia you feel about God.
 
I remember seeing a study looking at the percentage of prisoners in US jails (delineated according to religion). A fraction of 1% of all US prisoners claim to be atheist or agnostic, while Roman Catholics are the largest group in our prisons (over one third of all convicts are Catholic), and Protestants run a close second. Mind you … it’s not like we’re as small of a minority as we used to be (indeed some estimates put our numbers at over 10% of the US population).

So now I ask, considering numbers like that … who is truly more depressed? Indeed theists are more likely to be serial killers, racists, and just about every other bad thing you can think of. Yet you probably read some obscure study (no doubt by a theist proponent) that says we’re depressed :rolleyes:
Considering the numbers of prisoners and other sinners, I now ask you…isn’t God awesome in sending His only Son to be the Savior of the world? And if we all** believed and obeyed Him, wouldn’t we all be happier?
 
At this point I should point out that I was raised a Christian. I believed in God, Jesus, and all the trappings. The fact that God could not answer my questions is part of the reason I lost my faith.
Then all you really need to know is the freedom of repentance and the embrace of our All-forgiving God!
Actions speak louder than words. God could prove His “infinite love” by eliminating malaria and reducing the suffering of millions. Of course, this act would not absolve Him for all the suffering He has already inflicted on humanity.
A single “act” of submission on your part, to God’s majesty might clear up your confusion.

I’m sorry for the pain that drove you away from God. His gaze has never left you, His beloved child! He knows what you’re suffering and He desires to comfort you. Don’t turn away from the only One who can heal your heart! May He bless you and deliver you from your despair, dear friend. Peace.
 
I remember seeing a study looking at the percentage of prisoners in US jails (delineated according to religion). A fraction of 1% of all US prisoners claim to be atheist or agnostic, while Roman Catholics are the largest group in our prisons (over one third of all convicts are Catholic), and Protestants run a close second. Mind you … it’s not like we’re as small of a minority as we used to be (indeed some estimates put our numbers at over 10% of the US population).

So now I ask, considering numbers like that … who is truly more depressed? Indeed theists are more likely to be serial killers, racists, and just about every other bad thing you can think of. Yet you probably read some obscure study (no doubt by a theist proponent) that says we’re depressed :rolleyes:
I didn’t base my comments on any “study” (like the old bromide says, there are three kinds of untruths, lies, damn lies and statistics) but simply on my life experience, in talking with people and reading what they wrote. Indeed, some of the posts on this thread simply prove my point. :rolleyes:
Many atheists (and I am not talking about agnostics, or “happy hedonists” who ignore the question of God, but those who make atheism their creed) do not simply deny the existence of God, but positively rage against him (again, borne out by some of the posts on this thread). Indeed, you need a strong stomach to endure some of the vile venom spewed on some atheistic websites. How can one be so angry against someone who doesn’t exist (in their view)? G.K. Chesterton wrote regarding blasphemy that if someone tried to think blasphemous about the Norse God Thor would be found by his family at the end of the day to be in a state of exhaustion.
 
Charles,

Oh, and by the way I said “Christianity,” not the bible. Try to be a little more rigorous, Mr. Darwin.

But that is precisely my point, Charles. Society! What society have you been living in? The West? What’s the biggest influence on ethical development in the West for the last 2000 years? Christian philosophy, or, more recently, reaction against it. If not for Christianity your societal norms would be for rich men alone; slavery would be legal (and moral–just look at non-Christian cultures today); women would be property; science would be trapped into the cyclic philosophy that preceded Christianity; and you would likely be celebrating easter with the temple prostitutes. Even romance and chivalry would not exist without Christianity. It never did before. Mimetic violence would still be the norm, and not one of us would think any differently. Christ exposed the hidden truth behind the veil of cultural myths, however. Victims are never guilty. That set the West on a course for human rights.

How do you know something is moral? Because society said so?

If society told you to kill Jews would that make it moral? It did in secular systems of the 20th century.

Your diatribe simply proves my case, and answers my question posed above. You are petulant, and angry like a spoiled child (or a faithful brown shirt). You admit yourself that you’d be “as well” in worshipping Hitler as God. You would make a proper ubermensche of the Third Reich.

By the way, I am not a “fun-de-mentalist”, but you may want to try your schtick on them. It may even work. 🤓
Excellent post! 👍

I’m reminded of something C.S. Lewis wrote in his book The Problem of Pain. Many people, he said, don’t want a Father in Heaven, but a Grandfather in Heaven: some benign deity who “liked to see young people enjoying themselves” and whose plan for the universe was nothing more than at the end of each day it could be said “a good time was had by all.”
 
Ah yes we should all miss those good old days of slavery, Puritan torture, Catholic inquisitions, religious superstition and paranoia, people basing their lives on bizarre mythology … wow I see your point (I feel so much more enlightened now :confused:)
Ah yes, and the state sponsored atheism of the 20th century is much more enlightened…:rolleyes:
 
I’m reminded of something C.S. Lewis wrote in his book The Problem of Pain. Many people, he said, don’t want a Father in Heaven, but a Grandfather in Heaven: some benign deity who “liked to see young people enjoying themselves” and whose plan for the universe was nothing more than at the end of each day it could be said “a good time was had by all.”
I’ll have to remember*** that*** one , when I’m dealing with my in-laws.😛 Thanks for the posting!
 
Actions speak louder than words. God could prove His “infinite love” by eliminating malaria and reducing the suffering of millions. Of course, this act would not absolve Him for all the suffering He has already inflicted on humanity.
If you don’t believe in God, how can you be angry at Someone who doesn’t exist?

If this earthly life were the end-all, be-all of existence, then yes, God could prove his love by eliminating earthly suffering. But we as Christians we are destined for something infinitely better. God is our Father in Heaven, not our Grandfather in Heaven (see where I quoted C.S. Lewis in post #908).
 
But that is precisely my point, Charles. Society! What society have you been living in? The West? What’s the biggest influence on ethical development in the West for the last 2000 years? Christian philosophy, or, more recently, reaction against it. If not for Christianity your societal norms would be for rich men alone; slavery would be legal (and moral–just look at non-Christian cultures today); women would be property; science would be trapped into the cyclic philosophy that preceded Christianity; and you would likely be celebrating easter with the temple prostitutes. Even romance and chivalry would not exist without Christianity. It never did before. Mimetic violence would still be the norm, and not one of us would think any differently. Christ exposed the hidden truth behind the veil of cultural myths, however. Victims are never guilty. That set the West on a course for human rights.
I have never read so much nonsense in all my life. I am going out now, but i will get you to you on this.
 
Charles,
I have never read so much nonsense in all my life.
Don’t you proof-read your own text?😉

Seriously though, tell us all what enlightened and noble men your Scottish pre-Christian forefathers were, won’t you? How did they do on women’s rights; homosexuality; war; slavery, etc.?

All my best . . .
 
On women’s rights suprisingly well from what we know actually
I do seem to recall that the Celts (a broad term for Europeans, really, not so much specifically Irish/Scottish as the term is popularized now) held women in high regard. Something to do with their place within the folk religions as “priestesses” and healers, I think.

All my best . . .
 
I do seem to recall that the Celts (a broad term for Europeans, really, not so much specifically Irish/Scottish as the term is popularized now) held women in high regard. Something to do with their place within the folk religions as “priestesses” and healers, I think.

All my best . . .
…not to mention queens…
 
Ah yes, and the state sponsored atheism of the 20th century is much more enlightened…:rolleyes:
gotta love the logic of trying to create a fictitious nexus between communists and non-theists. Communism didn’t like religion because they felt it was used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. Atheists and agnostics don’t adhere to religion because we simply don’t believe its claims (no atheist I’ve ever come across seeks to infringe on any ones religious rights).

This is how religion operates and sustains itself. Creating illogical connections between unrelated facts and events, fostering paranoia among its adherents, and creating false boogy men (who are out to devour the true blue righteous remnant … etc, etc.). Same old story for centuries? However, it’s not like anyone can say clergy men are all bent on some global conspiracy to manipulate the minds of the masses. Members of the clergy are almost always exceptional men and women of faith. In other words they really believe this stuff, so creating an atmosphere of paranoia and intolerance is not something they conspire to do … but rather it’s an inherent trait of religion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top