C
catsrus
Guest
Many if not most of the Evangelical pastors in my country are former RCs.
Many if not most of the Evangelical pastors in my country are former RCs.
I live in Spain. 95% of people born in the 1960s and 70s–i.e. the Franco era–were baptised RC. Yes, I say so. And a large number of RC priests are now evangelical pastors.ok. If you say so…
I am very grateful for the RC church in Spain, because it has prepared the ground for many spiritually hungry people to embrace Jesus, either within the RC church or outside, as is increasingly the case.There are lots of former Catholics that don’t bash the RCC. But of course…you’re less likely to hear from them, about them if you are still in the RCC. The ones making noise are the ones that you’ll notice. In my journey from Catholicism, through Protestantism, and paganism, I have met lots of former RCC’s, who have fond memories of their childhood faith, and don’t knock it, except for the fact that they don’t believe it anymore.
But since they are out of the CC, I guess most RCC members don’t hear their stories. Also, in my experience, simply leaving the Catholic faith is taken as an afront by many Catholics. Most of the time, when it comes up in conversation, they are the ones pushing the issues, being angry and argumentative with me. They want to prove me wrong, win me back, defend the faith. So even though I had no desire or issue to argue faith with them…they push the issues, and then tell me I am hateful, angry, and anti-Catholic.
So…some of this might merely be who you are in contact with, and your own personal perspective.
Personally, I am grateful for the faith foundation I received in Catholicism, it prepared me for what lay ahead.
cheddar
Can’t really comment one way or another unless you actually post some of the words.Yes, in this and other sources Scott Hahn’s testimony is filled with anger. His basic message: I was an angry anti-Catholic bigot. I became a Catholic and I am angry how fellow Evangelicals view my conversion. I am angry the the Evangelical church did not teach me about various RC teachings. Angry, angry, angry.
I am paraphrasing, obviously. Perhaps the RCs on this board do not have the sensitivity to pick up on Hahn’s attitude in the midst of their rejoicing about his conversion.
I believe you are quoting from Dave Armstrong’s long critique of Evangelical Protestantism titled “Protestantism: Conceptual and Developmental Errors”, am I correct? Here is the full text of that critique.It is not surprising to me that there are **Catholics **who **have **and will in the future be attracted to a gospel that meets their personal needs.
How long it will last is up to the Lord!
.
Charles Colson (P) Well acclamed founder of Prison Ministry.
Some evangelists see converts **as trophies in a big game hunt **and measure their success by numbers . . . The result of all this is a watered-down message that, in large part, accounts for today’s **epidemic spread **of **easy believism, Christianity without cost. **
Many evangelical leaders are alarmed at an unbridled love of mammon among their flocks and peers, and an increasing number of books are now appearing, by, e.g., Ron Side, Jacques Ellul, Tom Sine, Anthony Campolo, John White, and Richard Foster.
Sadly, however, the concern of wise leaders will likely have little effect on the massive accommodation to the influence of worldly pressures.
Charles Colson (P)
Much of today’s teaching and preaching communicates Christianity as an instant fix to all **of our pains **and struggles. Consequently, we begin to think of our faith as a sparkling magic wand: we wave it, and presto, our problems are gone in a puff of smoke. But this is, **bluntly **put, heresy. Like most subtle heresies, it tickles our ears . It not only makes Christians incredibly naive in approaching complex problems, but it can shatter the fragile faith of the believer who expects the magic wand to work every time. When those problems **don’t **disappear . . he questions whether his spirituality is faulty.
.
Very telling that you still don’t want to cite any specific passages in the book. Just more blanket allegations with ZERO proof…Yes, in this and other sources Scott Hahn’s testimony is filled with anger. His basic message: I was an angry anti-Catholic bigot. I became a Catholic and I am angry how fellow Evangelicals view my conversion. I am angry the the Evangelical church did not teach me about various RC teachings. Angry, angry, angry.
I am paraphrasing, obviously. Perhaps the RCs on this board do not have the sensitivity to pick up on Hahn’s attitude in the midst of their rejoicing about his conversion.
I have already cited from the Lamb’s Supper.Very telling that you still don’t want to cite any specific passages in the book. Just more blanket allegations with ZERO proof…
citing a whole book? lolI have already cited from the Lamb’s Supper.
Oh yes, all too revealing…citing a whole book? lol
Again, that you fail to give specific passages from the book is all too revealing…
Yep :yup: time ran out before I managed to attach page link!I believe you are quoting from Dave Armstrong’s long critique of Evangelical Protestantism titled “Protestantism: Conceptual and Developmental Errors”, am I correct? Here is the full text of that critique.
In any case this is already off-topic.
I have already cited from the Lamb’s Supper.
In his book Hail Holy Mother, he comes across as angry and at times very uncharitable. In his discussion about what the Greek word for brother (adelphos) means, he makes very frequent use of the term “heretic”, in an angry way that basically calls all Evangelicals “heretics”. He calls Evangelical scholarship “amateur exegesis”.
I am not surprised that many of you do not find Scott Hahn to be problematic, but I do. Many of you claim that James McCarthy is offensive, but he sounds often quite similar to Hahn, only is calling RCs “heretics”. Otherwise, they are quite similar in tone.
Respectfully, you have posted page numbers but other than your summary of what Scott Hahn said, you have NOT posted what he has said that is “anti-Evangelical”.Oh yes, all too revealing…
“amateur exegesis” p. 105, Hail Holy Mother.
Have you even read Scott Hahn?
That is NOT what you posted. You posted:originally posted by JesusforMadrid
And a large number of RC priests are now evangelical pastors.
So, which is it?originally posted by** JesusforMadrid**
Many if not most of the Evangelical pastors in my country are former RCs.
No, anymore than you are a “Catholic” expert.originally posted by JesusforMadrid
Are you a Spain expert?
OK, lets do the following. Let’s each get out our library of Scott Hahn books, (mine in Spanish, such as Roma, Dulce Lugar and these others I have mentioned) and we can do a detailed study on each one of these, searching the text for where I don’t like Hahn’s tone. Then I shall translate each of these texts, name the page number, you can buy the Spanish versions to ensure that I am not making it up. We will do this so that I can show that world that my impression of Scott Hahn is what it is.Nice try again, but I have that book too and by the way it’s called “Hail Holy Queen”, not “Hail Holy Mother”…
On p. 105 what he is referring to as “amateur exegesis” is an argument made by a man named Helvidius, who argued against St. Jerome - this would have been in the 4th or 5th century, when there were no Evangelicals around to begin with!
At least now I know you aren’t just pulling random page #'s out of thin air. But if even after all this time, that is still the best evidence you have for Scott Hahn’s “anti-evangelical” tone I’d say you’re probably hurting your cause more than helping it right now.
Let see:That is NOT what you posted. You posted:
So, which is it?
OK, but I shall be quoting from my Spanish versions such as Roma Dulce Lugar. La verdad es que no sé si las páginas corresponden, pero problamente si cito la página, puedes averiguar donde esta.Respectfully, you have posted page numbers but other than your summary of what Scott Hahn said, you have NOT posted what he has said that is “anti-Evangelical”.
Many here do not have the book and those that do have said they do not “see” what you are talking about.
Try posting SPECIFIC quotes from the book, citing page number and the quote, instead of page number and your summary. You have made some serious allegations against a person and you need to back them up.
That is okay, I am sure if you post the page you do have it on, along with the quote, we can “find” it.OK, but I shall be quoting from my Spanish versions such as Roma Dulce Lugar. La verdad es que no sé si las páginas corresponden, pero problamente si cito la página, puedes averiguar donde esta.
I can see I have touched a real nerve in the Catholic Answers community. Scott Hahn left the evangelical church to become Catholic, his wife joining later, and has since then exerted considerable energies to defend this decision.