S
SeekNFind
Guest
I notice that too, people don’t bow and some barely want to genuflect or bow before the host in the communion line (and I realize that some people have arthritis or joint problems, etc). 
you got a snork from me…The palms-up thing makes me uncomfortable. Seems like an Evangelical Protestant thing.
I’m not trying to attack anyone, just trying to understand. Thank you for helping me to understand.T
I agree with JillianRose–give people a break. Many people have known these liturgical responses since infanthood, even if they were Protestant. My husband and I were both Protestant in non-liturgical churches, but we still learned the Creeds and some of the various responses because we both occasionally attended mainline Protestant churchs (primarily due to music gigs). It’s really hard to break long-standing habits.
.
Oh dear, you go to a parish full of strangers? That must be remedied.I see your point, but my friends who are Catholic are all either knowledgeable and devout or lapsed, so I’d basically have to ask a stranger.
Several centuries before “evangelical protestant” was a term, ancient Christians adopted the orans posture for prayer. It might not have been their posture for prayer during the Divine Liturgy, but it was used. Some of the oldest Christian artwork shows people – women, no less! – praying in the orans posture.The palms-up thing makes me uncomfortable. Seems like an Evangelical Protestant thing.
I’ve noticed many priests don’t fully genuflect in the EF when rubrics call for it. But the effort counts IMO.I feel your pain. I have the opposite problem. I can bow without a problem. I can’t genuflect. I try, but if I go lower than a short curtsy I’d end up on the floor in pain.
The rubrics call for a profound bow which is from the waist.It’s also tough to show a bow when you’re already reading a card. What are you supposed to do, look up and then look down at the card and then up again? Just saying.
Then of course there are exceptions if a person cannot take postures such as bowing and kneeling. After all we are trying to be respectful to the Lord and obedient to the Church, two things that do not require us to hurt ourselves so long as the intention is in our heart.The rubrics call for a profound bow which is from the waist.
One can still “cheat” with that instruction. Just saying.The rubrics call for a profound bow which is from the waist.
One can still cheat on that, especially since he or she has to hold that position for 15-20 seconds, which is what I timed it singing Credo III in Latin.The rubrics call for a profound bow which is from the waist.
I suspect that some may be confused about what “bowing” is - I have caught some people nodding their heads at that point, but you’re right - almost no one actually bows from the waist.I truly honestly thought that the reason people didn’t bow for that part of the creed (from “and by the Holy Spirit” to “became man”) was because they didn’t know they were supposed to. I thought, therefore, that when people had to read the creed off a card that said * in bright red lettering* “all bow for the following lines until ‘became man’”, they would start bowing.
So why am I still the ONLY person in the congregation who bows for those words?
(I could say the same about striking the chest at the mea culpa.)
I try not to pay attention to what other people do, which is why I am posting this now instead of last December. I just genuinely would like to understand. Do they think it’s demeaning to bow to God? Do they not believe in God? Are they afraid of standing out? Are they mad at the Church and purposefully disobeying? Are they unable to read red letters? Why?![]()
If you’re doing it properly while reading along, your book or card will be touching the floor - we aren’t talking about a mini-head-bob, here, but a profound (deep, waist folded over as completely as possible) bow.I’ve noticed many priests don’t fully genuflect in the EF when rubrics call for it. But the effort counts IMO.
As far as bowing goes, Catholics used to be scolded for not bowing at the name of Jesus. Nowadays you can’t tell if people are bowing or just looking down at the ground or their missals. It’s also tough to show a bow when you’re already reading a card. What are you supposed to do, look up and then look down at the card and then up again? Just saying.
Maybe if they built churches with altar rails then everyone would still kneel. This is partly the fault of modernist architects.I notice that too, people don’t bow and some barely want to genuflect or bow before the host in the communion line (and I realize that some people have arthritis or joint problems, etc).![]()
I agree with all of this. It’s difficult that different masses at the same parish switch all the time, and more difficult still that different churches in the same parish, or different parishes in the same diocese, have different ways of doing mass. None of them are ever the same, and it’s so confusing! It’s even harder for someone who wasn’t raised Catholic!It also doesn’t help when the priests allow people to switch back and forth between singing various Mass settings (without announcing the page number where the music can be found in the hymnal) and reciting with no music. This is confusing. Far be it from me to criticize a priest of the Lord Jesus, but honestly–the way to help people learn something is to repeat and repeat and repeat endlessly, not pull the rug out and leave them falling.
…]
My personal feeling is that the priest should actually pause in the Mass before starting the Gloria and say slowly and clearly, “The Gloria may be found on the pew card (or give the page number in the hymnal) . If you have not yet memorized the new setting, please find it now. We are all working towards learning this new setting, and we appreciate your efforts.” And THEN go on and recite the Gloria.