S
Singinbeauty
Guest
So what would it be said of me if I said I was anti-catholocism but not anti-catholic?
That you are confused. What distinguishes Catholicism from the Catholic in your view? In mine, one is the living embodiment of the theology, doctrines and dogma of the other.So what would it be said of me if I said I was anti-catholocism but not anti-catholic?
Thank you!That you are confused. What distinguishes Catholicism from the Catholic in your view? In mine, one is the living embodiment of the theology, doctrines and dogma of the other.
Then the point is made and succinctly, too.But you made my point on this thread very clear. You can’t be anti the belief and not be anti the person in some small way…
By the way - I am not anti-catholocism… I just wanted to make a point since this thread coinsided with the one I linked to…![]()
Why are Protestants who have bias against the Catholic Church so Anti-Catholic. There are numerous Non-Catholic Members here who are extremely Anti-Catholic. I won’t mention their names.
Wait, I think you just got someone to argue your point for you using reverse psychology, which doesn’t necessarily validate your argument.Thank you!
Please see this thread: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=134807… So many times I read ‘I am not anti-protestant just anti-protestantism.’ and had the same thought as you… but sigh, no one got it… But you made my point on this thread very clear. You can’t be anti the belief and not be anti the person in some small way…
By the way - I am not anti-catholocism… I just wanted to make a point since this thread coinsided with the one I linked to…![]()
The Spanish Inquisitionreformation.org/spanish-inquisition.htmlThanks for the laugh o’ the day. It’s been a while since anybody brought up The Trail of Blood. Trouble is, there are people who actually believe it’s true. Baptists I know run screaming when people mention it because it’s so embarrassing.
Anyway, you summed up the typical a-C rant in the shortest post I have ever seen . I’ll have to save it for future use.
Argggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg … Drivel, pure historical revisionistic drivel.The Spanish Inquisition
Argggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg … Drivel, pure historical revisionistic drivel.
And the contention that Paul went to Spain and Britain.
The people who author this know nothing of historical scholarship and integrity, and their theology mirrors their lack of ethics.
I hate being so judgmental, but one tires of fighting the same battle over and over again against the forces of ignorance. And they have the temerity to say the RCC is the devil’s work? Satan is on the floor of Hades laughing his head off and slapping his thigh. “Oh good boys, Luther, Calvin, Wesley … well done! Bravo! Oh … and here, have a second helping of ignorance. No, really. It’s on me!”
I assume that you mean anti-catholocism refers to the Catholic Church and the other to all Christians?So what would it be said of me if I said I was anti-catholocism but not anti-catholic?
In thThe Spanish Inquisition Really Did Occur!
geocities.com/iberianinquisition/
The Roman Empire keyway.ca/htm2003/20030306.htmArgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg … Drivel, pure historical revisionistic drivel.
And the contention that Paul went to Spain and Britain.
The people who author this know nothing of historical scholarship and integrity, and their theology mirrors their lack of ethics.
I hate being so judgmental, but one tires of fighting the same battle over and over again against the forces of ignorance. And they have the temerity to say the RCC is the devil’s work? Satan is on the floor of Hades laughing his head off and slapping his thigh. “Oh good boys, Luther, Calvin, Wesley … well done! Bravo! Oh … and here, have a second helping of ignorance. No, really. It’s on me!”
You forgot about the conservative protestants out there when you created your model. You know, the ones that don’t allow abortion, don’t allows women as pastors, and actually act more like Care Bears than a lot of Catholics do.I honestly think deep down it is jealousy because we are apostolic. Because history is so against them. They know deep down that their church was created by Martin Luther and not Jesus Christ, but out of their arrogance and pride they cannot submit to the Catholic Church. They want a “christianity” that works for them, allows abortion, allows women priests, and allows them to do more of what they want. So they join the church ‘they feel’ is right from them, and then justify it by attacking the Catholic Church in order to make them feel better and justify their own beliefs. But in reality they are only doing harm to thierselves and their own salvation.
One man popping up out of nowhere 1500 years after Christ out of pride and ego to seperate the church and have his own followers. Much like Mohammed wanted. That is the epitamy of protestantism…and its very sad that all of the theological beliefs protestants base their views on is ONE man.
By attacking the Catholic Church, you claim that God did it wrong for 1500 years before Luther came. And thus they make Luther the real Savior and not Jesus. So they contradict themselves unknowingly out of their zeal and hatred for the church… And when they read the ECF, some of which who were friends and diciples of the apostles, which makes it even worse for them because they know Martin Luther did not talk to or even converse with one apostle like St. Igantius, or Clement, or Polycarp did. And thus because of this, they result to the only thing they can do, attack the church…
Now, if we can just get you clued in on Apostolic Tradition, Magisterium and the relevance of sacraments.You forgot about the conservative protestants out there when you created your model. You know, the ones that don’t allow abortion, don’t allows women as pastors, and actually act more like Care Bears than a lot of Catholics do.
Romans 4:5 "But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness."