W
Walking_Home
Guest
Originally Posted by Walking_Home
You see—I have come across some who believe – intinction is still spiting the gospel—since Christ said to eat and to drink (two different actions) and to them receiving by intinction does not fit Christ’s command.
Those people you have come across don’t really get the concept of Transubstantiation.
The specific interactions of our thoats on the accidents do not matter anymore than the speicific interaction of our eyes with Eucharist.
Tell them not to confuse accidents with Substance.
Although I am doing what I can — The extent of these errors --is greater than what I can accomplish on my own. It will take the action of many ---- to control and suppress the falsehood being spread. You see —people are being indoctrinated with these errors far and wide. Since the Neocatechumenals teach reception via intinction is contrary to the dictates of the Gospel and the Liturgy—the same is said of reception via one species alone.
Part of the Neocatechumenal objective is to get the general Catholic population to see reception via one species as somehow being “deficient”. Here I will say this: I am not stating anyone who participated in this thread is a full fledged member of the Neocatechumenal Way—but this thread ( +prior threads) does reflect --how far their influence has already gone.
They compare reception of one species alone as going to the well of grace (Holy Communion) with a basket — while receiving both species is going with a bucket. (water runs threw a basket)
(The Neocatechumenals are doing the same with baptism—pouring = the basket, while submersion = the bucket)
A solution to the “problem” the responsible speaks off—is the breaking up (take over) of diocese and parishes --into the smaller Neocatechumenal “communities” --that accomodate the Neocatechumenal “ideology”–and reflect the small christian “communities” of the “early” Church.
This is only part of what the Neocatechumenal Way is undermining — within the Church.
Interview with the responsible of the Neocatechumenal Way –
Giuseppe Gennarini
korazym.org/news1.asp?Id=15805
Peraltro, il problema di come attuare la distribuzione delle due specie è un problema molto più grande di noi, che investe tutta la Chiesa e rappresenta oggi una delle questioni più complesse che vi siano. Si è tentato negli anni passati di distribuire il vino usando un cucchiaino (ed è stato un disastro), si è provato con la cannuccia (ed è andata ancora peggio),** c’è stato un tentativo con l’intinzione, che però è contraria non solo al dettato del Vangelo, ma anche agli stessi libri liturgici.** Ora si sta provando con il calice, ma è chiaro che in una chiesa grande i fedeli non vogliono comunicarsi con il calice… Insomma, la questione è seria ed è davvero difficile trovare un modo modo che aiuti ad attuare la distribuzione delle due specie. All’interno della piccola comunità, la distribuzione del calice, è invece fattibile, perché il numero dei fedeli è limitato e tutti si conoscono.
Babelfish translation
Moreover, the problem of as putting into effect the distribution of the two species it is a problem many larger than we, that the Church invests all and today represents one of the more complex issues that are. It has been tried in the years it passes you to distribute to the wine using a teaspoon (and has been a disaster), it has been tried with the cannuccia (and has gone still worse), has** been an attempt with the intinzione, than but it is contrary not only to the dictation of the Gospel, but also to the same liturgici books.** Hour is being tried with the goblet, but it is clearly that in a large church the faithfuls do not want to communicate themselves with the goblet… Insomma, **the issue is serious **and is indeed difficult to find a way way that aids to put into effect the distribution of the two species. To the inside of the small community, the distribution of the goblet, is instead feasible, because the number of the faithfuls is limited and all are known.