J
jmcrae
Guest
The proper context of the Scriptures is the Catholic Church. They cannot be properly understood outside of their proper context.St. Jerome himself said “ignorance of scriptures is ignorance of Christ”.![]()
The proper context of the Scriptures is the Catholic Church. They cannot be properly understood outside of their proper context.St. Jerome himself said “ignorance of scriptures is ignorance of Christ”.![]()
Hi, Ill address you and JM:thumbsup: My very begining posts actually does answer the question. Im sorry if the answer doesnt sit well with you but it is what it is.Kay Cee;1920645 [QUOTE said:]I’m afraid you haven’t anwered the question at all.
Yes I do have the Hs indwelling in me.
- Do you yourself fit your criterea for having the authority to interpret scripture?
The bible.
- Where did you get the idea that your criterea is the correct one for determining who has the authority to interpret scripture?
I have a sincere question, that may sound a little leading, but it’s not meant to be.So, one reason that different people have different interpretations of the Bible is simply that some do not listen to the Teacher. Here are some other reasons for the wide divergence of beliefs among those who teach the Bible:
- Unbelief.
- Lack of training.
- Poor hermeneutics
- Ignorance of the whole Word of God
- Selfishness and pride
- Failure to mature
- Undue emphasis on tradition
I guess it does sound slightly judgemental but that is just how humans are.I have a sincere question, that may sound a little leading, but it’s not meant to be.
Seeing as how these criteria all seem to stem from personal flaws/laziness, don’t those criteria require you to judge the very character/skill of people with whom you disagree as inferior to those who “get it right?” It’s as if not only are you saying many people will interpret scripture wrongly (that much is true), but they must be doing so by their own personal fault, whether unbelief, sinfulness, immaturity, or outright laziness. Is that really for you to judge, even if your “opponent’s” point of view justifies something like, say, abortion?
The Catholic would say people misinterpret Scripture because it was never meant to be used alone…it seems the Protestant must say people misinterpret scripture because “they possess at least one of these flaws, or else they’d get it right without needing any church to tell them,” all the while having to conclude that some people (perhaps themselves) must not have any of those flaws, which is the only way anyone can get it right by this logic. It just sounds a little judgmental/mind-reading to me.
Sorry, again…I don’t mean to sound aggressive at all. I just can’t think of how else to word it.![]()
Because they agree with the author on what it means.The bible.
I have a question for you guys.
How do you determine who is interpreting any written work correctly?
By whether they agree with each other, with those in the past who have also studied these things, and also with the actual teachings of the Church, which come down to us from the Apostles.How do you decide who is interpreting the Fathers and the Pope correctly?
This solid actual data would also be an intrepretationBecause they agree with the author on what it means.![]()
Could you be more specific? I’m not seeing it, and since I’m on limted time, I don’t have time to look. Could you please re-post it, and I’ll look at it when I return? Thanks!Hi, Ill address you and JM:thumbsup: My very begining posts actually does answer the question. Im sorry if the answer doesnt sit well with you but it is what it is.
That’s a excellent question. If we misinterpret something, we have live persons in the Magesterium who can correct us.I have a question for you guys.
How do you determine who is interpreting any written work correctly?
How do you decide who is interpreting the Fathers and the Pope correctly?![]()
Hurry back!!I’m afraid I’m going to have to bow out of the discussion for a while. We’re still having major computer problems, and even though we have a new computer, the only internet service I’ve got now is a time limited Net Zero (our old one isn’t working for some reason) and I have to leave what time we’ve got to my kids in case they need to do research for homework.
I’ll try to get back ASAP!
What kind of sense does that make?Originally Posted by jmcrae View Post
Quote:
Because they agree with the author on what it means.
Hi, You realize this doesnt necessarily make it true.
I think you’ve missed my point.Quote:
Normally what happens is, after the book is published, various reviewers interview the author to find out what the goal was with writing that book, and how they perceive it. If the reading public has questions about the book, they go to the author for clarification.
You do realize that that is what I/ many non-catholic christians do when it comes to the bible.We go to the bible for clarifications.
When I said, “you can do actual research and find out what the author says about these characters,” I didn’t mean going back and reading the book itself again.Quote:
These clarifications are put into writing at some point (letters, magazine articles, web sites, blogs, etc.) and so, if you have an interest in a particular book beyond what is in the book itself (for example, you want to know if Harry Potter is based on a real person, or if Jason Bourne has anything in common with real CIA spies) you can do actual research and find out what the author says about these characters.
That is exactly how we can check out when someone writes about intrepretations on the bible–we can go back to the source and see if it lines up with what the bible says.
. Again, though the actual teachings from the church would also be an intrepretation on their part.
Yes, but it’s the interpretation of the poeple who actually wrote it (the Apostles), and their students.This solid actual data would also be an intrepretation![]()
You answered: The Bible.Where did you get the idea that your criterea is the correct one for determining who has the authority to interpret scripture?
Hi, I did not say I was wrong I said I understand that that passage was referring to end times and I should have been more specific in that I was speaking of one verse within that passage.But in post #153 you responded to jmcrae’s position that you had misinterpreted some verses (he said they were about the Second Coming) and you seemed to agree with him that you had been wrong.
We can all be wrong on issues because no one is infallible-- not even me–although sometimes I would like to let my kids think I know it all.So what does this authority of yours mean if you can be wrong? Certainly you’re not claiming infallibility, are you? And if you can be wrong, why should anyone look to you as an authority?
I go to someone else who has more knowledge then I do. The HS gives each one of us(believers) a gift from God. My ministers is the gift of teaching /preaching. My gift is acts of service–which is why I run the homeless ministry. God chose people to spread His message so of course there will be people who know more biblically then I and I know more then some others who may be starting out. We all have our role within the church.And what does it mean if, as you posted above, that you go to your minister (not just the Bible itself) to find out the correct interpretation of certain verses? If you’re a true believer with the Holy Spirit dwelling within you–and that gives you the authority to interpret scripture–why not just ask the Holy Spirit if you’re right? Why go to someone else?
Hi JM,What kind of sense does that make?
Even if the work is fictional, the author is the one who knows what it means. You can’t go up to the author of a book and tell them that they meant something different than what they say they meant.
I think you’ve missed my point.
The Bible didn’t write itself. The Apostles and their first followers wrote it. We go to what the Apostles and their first followers said about it, afterwards, to find out what they meant by it. We go to their Successors, the Bishops, to find out what they were taught about it.
When I said, “you can do actual research and find out what the author says about these characters,” I didn’t mean going back and reading the book itself again.
I meant, going to their students, and going to the reviews, and the magazine articles that they wrote, and the lectures they gave, and the interviews that they gave, about the book.
In the case of the New Testament, we find out from their students, the Early Fathers, by reading what the Early Fathers wrote, and by looking into history and finding out what the Early Church actually believed - how did they interpret it, and what did they write about it, what songs did they sing, what pictures did they paint, etc.?
Quote:
By whether they agree with each other, with those in the past who have also studied these things, and also with the actual teachings of the Church, which come down to us from the Apostles
Yes, but it’s the interpretation of the poeple who actually wrote it (the Apostles), and their students.
If I take a class from Margaret Atwood (she writes Canadian fiction) on her works, I can be sure that I know what she meant by them, because she would explain it to the class. I took a class from her one time, and she explained why her stories always have sad endings. She said, “All stories have sad endings. It’s just that so many authors quit writing in the middle. But after the “happily ever after,” someone eventually gets into a fight, someone eventually gets sick, and all of them eventually die. I keep writing the stories up to the part where they all die, because to me, that’s the interesting part.” Knowing that helps us to understand her stories better.
Stephen Leacock noticed one time that there was a course being offered on his poetry. He had never heard of the instructor before, and he was sure that she had never contacted him for information about his works, before. So, he decided to enroll in the class under an assumed name, just to see what she might be teaching.
He failed the class.
The reason he failed the class was that the teacher was making up her own interpretation of his writings. She never even noticed or realized that he was the real Stephen Leacock, and even when he revealed himself to her and told her that he was, in fact, Stephen Leacock, she still insisted that his interpretation of his own writings was incorrect, and that she alone knew their real meaning.
I sometimes worry that a lot of “Bible alone” Christians are going to be like that instructor, with God, when they get to the Judgement Day. They are going to be so sure that their interpretation is the right one, that they won’t even believe God when He tells them in person that their interpretation is incorrect.
Then why should I accept you as an authority? You claim you have the authority to interpret scripture, but then also claim you could be wrong.Hi, I did not say I was wrong I said I understand that that passage was referring to end times and I should have been more specific in that I was speaking of one verse within that passage.
We can all be wrong on issues because no one is infallible-- not even me–although sometimes I would like to let my kids think I know it all.![]()
My point was that we do need an authority to tell us if our interpretations are right. You seemed to have verified that for me. This also seems to me to refute Sola Scriptura since we do need guides, not just the Bible alone.I go to someone else who has more knowledge then I do. The HS gives each one of us(believers) a gift from God. My ministers is the gift of teaching /preaching. My gift is acts of service–which is why I run the homeless ministry. God chose people to spread His message so of course there will be people who know more biblically then I and I know more then some others who may be starting out. We all have our role within the church.You guys go to the catechism and your priests and Im sure people who are more versed in catholocism then you—right? You also claim to have HS(I think–right)
I’m not seeing your answer there. Could you please repost it in something shorter?As for your last question Iwill have to revert back to my OP’s. If you dont like those answers Im sorry but it is what it is.![]()
Hi,Then why should I accept you as an authority? You claim you have the authority to interpret scripture, but then also claim you could be wrong.
And, if the Holy Spirit were truly guiding you, you would never be wrong, since the Holy Spirit is never wrong. Or are you saying the Holy Spirit guides you only some of the time or guides you insufficiently?
My point was that we do need an authority to tell us if our interpretations are right. You seemed to have verified that for me. This also seems to me to refute Sola Scriptura since we do need guides, not just the Bible alone.
I’m also curious why you claim you have the authority to interpret scripture when you admit others have “more knowledge.”
I claim the Church as a whole has the Holy Spirit to guide it. I have never claimed that I have any authority to interpret scripture.
I’m not seeing your answer there. Could you please repost it in something shorter?
Now I did ask for scripture passages to back up your assertion that your criterea for determining who has the authority to interpret scripture is correct. But, of course, since you admit you’re not infallible, how am I to tell if your interpretation of those passages (once you give them) is the correct one?
And please don’t tell me to check it against the Bible! You’ve already told me the Bible is not enough because others have “more knowledge.” So which others that have more knowledge should I go to? The ones who say the Eucharist is truly the Body and Blood of Christ or the ones who say it isn’t? The ones who adhere to infant Baptism or the ones who don’t?
AFH, the biggest problem I have here is that you’re telling me you have the authority to interpret scripture, the Holy Spirit is guiding you, but you still could be wrong in your interpretations. I’m finding that very contradictory. If you truly have a God-given authority to interpret scripture and God Himself is guiding you, you would never err!
These three Scriptures make it clear that the Holy Spirit must be received at the moment of salvation. Paul could not say that we all were baptized by one Spirit and all given one Spirit to drink if not all of the Corinthian believers possessed the Holy Spirit. Romans 8:9 is even stronger. If a person does not have the Spirit, he does not belong to Christ. Therefore, the possession of the Spirit is an identifying factor of the possession of salvation. Further, the Holy Spirit could not be the “seal of salvation” (Ephesians 1:13-14) if He is not received at the moment of salvation. Many Scriptures make it abundantly clear that our salvation is secured the moment we receive Christ as Savior.
After the gift of salvation through Jesus Christ, of all the other gifts given to mankind by God, there is none greater than the presence of the Holy Spirit. The Spirit has many functions, roles, and activities. First, He does a work in the hearts of all people everywhere. Jesus told the disciples that He would send the Spirit into the world to “convict the world concerning sin, and concerning righteousness, and concerning judgment” (John 16:7-11). Everyone has a “God consciousness,” whether they admit it or not, because the Spirit applies the truths of God to men’s own minds as to convince them by fair and sufficient arguments that they are sinners. Responding to that conviction brings men to salvation.“What is the role of the Holy Spirit in our lives today?”
Notice also, who it was that Ananias was actually trying to fool. Notice how it is that to lie to the Church that is under the authority of the Apostle Peter is the same thing as to lie to God the Holy Spirit.Hi,
Do you agree with the following?
"Who is the Holy Spirit?”
There are many misconceptions on the identity of the Holy Spirit. Some view the Holy Spirit as a mystical force. Others understand the Holy Spirit as the impersonal power God makes available to followers of Christ. What does the Bible say about the identity of the Holy Spirit? Simply put - the Bible says that the Holy Spirit is God. The Bible also tells us that the Holy Spirit is a Person, a Being with a mind, emotions, and a will.
The fact that the Holy Spirit is God is clearly seen in many Scriptures including Acts 5:3-4. In this verse Peter confronts Ananias as to why he had lied to the Holy Spirit and tells him that he had “not lied to men but to God.” It is a clear declaration that lying to the Holy Spirit is lying to God.
We can also know that the Holy Spirit is God because He possesses the attributes or characteristics of God. For example, the fact that the Holy Spirit is omnipresent is seen in Psalm 139:7-8, “Where can I go from Your Spirit? Or where can I flee from Your presence? If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in hell, behold, You are there.” Then in 1 Corinthians 2:10, we see the characteristic of omniscience in the Holy Spirit. “But God has revealed them to us through His Spirit. For the Spirit searches all things, yes, the deep things of God. For what man knows the things of a man except the spirit of the man which is in him? Even so no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God.”
All of these things are true. None of them indicate that the Holy Spirit comes personally to AllForHim to make her an infallible interpreter of the Scriptures.We can know that the Holy Spirit is indeed a Person because He possesses a mind, emotions, and a will. The Holy Spirit thinks and knows (1 Corinthians 2:10). The Holy Spirit can be grieved (Ephesians 4:30). The Spirit intercedes for us (Romans 8:26-27). The Holy Spirit makes decisions according to His will (1 Corinthians 12:7-11). The Holy Spirit is God, the third “Person” of the Trinity. As God, the Holy Spirit can truly function as the Comforter and Counselor that Jesus promised He would be (John 14:16,26; 15:26).
By the first one do you mean Psalms–which scripture are you referring to?Notice also, who it was that Ananias was actually trying to fool. Notice how it is that to lie to the Church that is under the authority of the Apostle Peter is the same thing