D
Damian
Guest
The biblical deity presents two places you go to when you die, heaven or hell. There was no third option. Since after you die, you are immediately judged for either path. Or is this not the case? If not, then again, seems the secularists and everyone else that has pushed back on this religion is forcing it to actually change its doctrine, terms, texts, scriptural education, etc. Progress of a sort.The theistic view of moral grounding is not reducible to “hell if you don’t comply,” by the way, so I wouldn’t make that case
Yes there is. I apply purpose to my car, regardless of its limited existence. It offers me a fuller, richer life, temporarily while it is here. Guess I’m equating purpose to value, but don’t really see a significant difference here to argue over. I assigned this value to it after experiencing what my life was like before having a car and while having a car. I can document and demonstrate that. You seem to be arguing that experience is not justified? Okay, guess that’s the philosophical difference between us. I go with what reality actually presents to me for what is good or bad for my life. You’ve concocted something completely separate of what reality demonstrates it seems and seem to dismiss actual experienced evidence of what reality presents. Yes if you don’t have bob telling you what to do, you are forced to be responsible for yourself and others for your success and failures. You are responsible for being remembered as a human rights violator or a leader of the people. You can’t pass this responsibility off to a “bob” and just hide behind, “just following the dear leader’s orders”, not my fault we have AIDS in Africa.If there is no grounding purpose in existence itself
Last edited: