Why can't non-Catholics who believe in the Real Presence receive the Eucharist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
HomeschoolDad

HomeschoolDad

Administrator
Staff member
If a non-Catholic baptized Christian believed in everything the Catholic Church does regarding the Catholic Eucharist — the Real Presence, body, blood, soul, and divinity, not just a symbol — and were properly disposed, what exactly is the obstacle to them receiving Holy Communion?

I am about as traditionalist as it gets — I will admit that I do like some things about the Vatican II era, such as the truncated communion fast — but it has never quite made sense to me why we would exclude the hypothetical Protestant who, for whatever reason, accepts the Catholic teaching on the Eucharist. Are they not baptized? Is it possible that they could say “yes, I accept that Our Lord is truly present in the Catholic Eucharist, but I do not think God expects me to become a Catholic — being a baptized Christian is enough”.

I do know that many Protestants believe in some kind of Real Presence — Anglicans, Lutherans, and Methodists (the latter one surprised me), possibly others. Why can’t they receive?
 
Last edited:
Because there is no salvation outside the Church, as a longstanding Catholic belief.
 
  1. When they say “Amen” (IF they do), they are intended to bear witness to the fact that they have granted assent to the sum total of the teachings of the Church which Christ founded. That, by definition, cannot happen.
  2. Very few, if any, would examine their conscience before receiving (1 Corinthians 11), as the Eucharist is an essentially meaningless symbol to many. Why would the Church allow them to eat and drink damnation or judgment unto themselves? That would violate Charity, the greatest of the Christian virtues.
  3. Due to their symbolic beliefs, they are far more likely, again, by definition to profane the Eucharist.
  4. The grace which flows via the Sacrament would be denied, under most circumstances.
  5. It would make a mockery of the deposit of faith.
  6. They may not have observed the fast - or even know of it or its purpose.
  7. It would cause scandal among the faithful.
    There are many and various other reasons, but these come immediately to mind.
 
Last edited:
Ask a priest…

My understanding is that they can go up and receive a blessing during Communion. Also, receiving the Sacrament of Reconciliation (Confession) first is important, because we have to receive our Lord worthily or we will answer for His Body and Blood.

Again, a person should discuss this with a priest first. God bless.
 
Hume said:
Because there is no salvation outside the Church, as a longstanding Catholic belief.
Click to expand...
po18guy said:
When they say “Amen” (IF they do), they are intended to bear witness to the fact that they have granted assent to the sum total of the teachings of the Church which Christ founded. That, by definition, cannot happen.
Click to expand...
Eastern Orthodox can receive Catholic Eucharist.
po18guy said:
Very few, if any, would examine their conscience before receiving ( 1 Corinthians 11 ), as the Eucharist is an essentially meaningless symbol to many. Why would the Church allow them to eat and drink damnation or judgment unto themselves? That would violate Charity, the greatest of the Christian virtues.
Click to expand...
This is a very good point. And confession can only be administered by Priest with Apostolic Succession. This means Protestants who lack this lineage can not receive Eucharist.
 
For the purposes of this thread, I include the Orthodox, as they are very close Apostolic brothers and sisters.

All post-reformation mainline Christians and so-called “bible believers” cannot partake as the reformation was the beginning of the end of their Sacraments.
 
Catholics take the Eucharist–all the sacraments–deeply seriously, and thus one needs to be fully committed to the Church and understanding of what is happening to receive them. Thank God for this seriousness about the precious gifts of God!

Protestants are protesting the Catholic Church and thus may not receive until fully reunited.
 
Ok so I’m a baptized Anglican who believes everything that the Catholic Church does regarding the Eucharist.

I don’t receive because:
I can’t confess to a Catholic priest so can never be properly disposed
I believe doing so is also a statement that I am in full communion with the Church (which I’m not) so I’d essentially be telling a lie by doing so.

I think if you come to the realisation that the Eucharist in the Catholic Church is everything that the Catholic Church teaches then you should be looking to enter the Church. So that could be another reason?

That’s how I see it anyway 🤷
 
Disagree…Our Church is present in this world and we are not to judge who is saved or not , God is only to judge. The receiving of Holy Communion has rules given to us by the Church, magisterium, scared scripture and sacred tradition. We permit certain orthodox Catholics (eastern) to receive under certain conditions. This is a question to ask a priest or one who can quote our rules and state where one can go to see the official teaching of the Church regarding the sacraments.
 
HomeschoolDad said:
If a non-Catholic baptized Christian believed in everything the Catholic Church does regarding the Catholic Eucharist — the Real Presence, body, blood, soul, and divinity, not just a symbol — and were properly disposed, what exactly is the obstacle to them receiving Holy Communion?
Click to expand...
Based on your comments such a person could receive Communion if they were in danger of death.

CCC 1401 When, in the Ordinary’s judgment, a grave necessity arises, Catholic ministers may give the sacraments of Eucharist, Penance, and Anointing of the Sick to other Christians not in full communion with the Catholic Church, who ask for them of their own will, provided they give evidence of holding the Catholic faith regarding these sacraments and possess the required dispositions.
 
HomeschoolDad said:
If a non-Catholic baptized Christian believed in everything the Catholic Church does regarding the Catholic Eucharist — the Real Presence, body, blood, soul, and divinity, not just a symbol — and were properly disposed, what exactly is the obstacle to them receiving Holy Communion?
Click to expand...
Can. 844 §1. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments licitly to Catholic members of the Christian faithful alone, who likewise receive them licitly from Catholic ministers alone, without prejudice to the prescripts of §§2, 3, and 4 of this canon, and ⇒ can. 861, §2.

§2. Whenever necessity requires it or true spiritual advantage suggests it, and provided that danger of error or of indifferentism is avoided, the Christian faithful for whom it is physically or morally impossible to approach a Catholic minister are permitted to receive the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick from non-Catholic ministers in whose Churches these sacraments are valid.

§3. Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church if they seek such on their own accord and are properly disposed. This is also valid for members of other Churches which in the judgment of the Apostolic See are in the same condition in regard to the sacraments as these Eastern Churches.

§4. If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church, who cannot approach a minister of their own community and who seek such on their own accord, provided that they manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments and are properly disposed.

§5. For the cases mentioned in §§2, 3, and 4, the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops is not to issue general norms except after consultation at least with the local competent authority of the interested non-Catholic Church or community.

For member of other true Churches with valid sacraments, there is no impediment to receiving in the Catholic Church from the Catholic perspective.

For those in ecclesial communities that lack valid sacraments (baptism and marriage excepted) then they can receive in danger of death, or some other serious or extraordinary circumstance with approval of the bishop.

Otherwise, in ordinary circumstances someone who believes all the teachings of the Catholic Church would be IN the Catholic Church already. To continue outside visible communion while claiming such is disingenuous at best.

Remember, the Church does teach there is a visible communion and we are not to remain outside communion with the Church.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nik
As I’m sure you’ve read, Eucharist has sometimes been offered to non-Catholic spouses of Catholics, and that has been highly controversial. I would presume/ hope that those non-Catholic spouses receiving, who seem to be mostly Lutherans in Germany although I’m aware of non-Lutheran cases as well, do believe that Jesus is present in the Eucharist and don’t just view it as receiving a symbolic piece of bread.
 
Last edited:
For starters, without access to a valid minister of the sacrament of reconciliation, non-Catholics are most probably likely to not be in a state of grace.

That aside, they cannot say, “Amen” in union with us, because as non-Catholics, they reject us and the teaching of the Church. They are not in communion with us, and so they cannot receive Communion.
 
A simple and straightforward answer. Receiving Holy Communion is a symbol of unity among the members of the Catholic community. As you are not a Catholic and not a member of the Catholic community it would be wrong for you to receive Communion.

I know that your church may invite Catholics to receive Communion. One of the reasons we would not is because we are not in communion with each other. (There is also the issue that we believe you do not have a valid Eucharist.)
 
Because receiving the Eucharist is also the ultimate sign of being in communion (hence the name) with the Church.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nik
HomeschoolDad said:
Why can’t they receive?
Click to expand...
As has already been said, they can, under the right circumstances. I had thought that that’s the way it’s been since at least JPII. :man_shrugging:t3:

To me, this question about who may receive the Eucharist leads to a deeper question of ‘what is a Catholic’. What exactly makes someone a Catholic. It is essentially the judgement of clergy, isn’t it? So if a priest allows a non-Catholic to receive the Eucharist, what then is left for that person to do in order to become Catholic?
 
Last edited:
say someone not a member of a Catholic church can not receive the Eucharist because they aren’t Catholic, but to say they aren’t part of the Church isn’t true. … that would depend on your definition of the Church… which is a whole other topic.

As for not allowing non-Catholic who are Christians, who have been baptized in the name of The Father the Son and the Holy Spirit, who have lived a good Christian holy life, who followed God’s will, to receive The Eucharist aren’t you denying them something Jesus wants them to have, denying them the opportunity to enter the new covenant given to us by Jesus?

Tell me I can’t because I’m not Catholic, but don’t tell me I can’t because I don’t believe in my Savior.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top