H
Hisalone
Guest
on a day other than Christs birth?
Makes no sense.
Makes no sense.
For centuries people were waiting for the King who was foretold would be born and free them, On the day He was born, the angels came and informed the shepherds, Three wise kings came to see Him from the east.on a day other than Christs birth?
Makes no sense.
The evidence against December 25th is much stronger than the evidence for it.Can you prove that December 25 was not His birth date? Prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt?
The fact is, Jesus was born. (You do believe that, I trust?) Therefore, He had a birthday. We do not know with certainty what the day was, yet we can certainly celebrate that He was born.
If you would rather celebrate His birth on another day, having had a private relevation where He appears to you and murmurs, “Confidentially, it was February 15”, go for it.
But unless you’re the Holy Spirit guiding us to full truth, I don’t think it’s in your job description to determine that "if we don’t know the real date of Christ’s birth we shouldn’t celebrate his birth at all because we can’t celebrate on ‘the day.’
The sheep were in the fields when Christ was born.For centuries people were waiting for the King who was foretold would be born and free them, On the day He was born, the angels came and informed the shepherds, Three wise kings came to see Him from the east.
Yes the day as per your say is important, but if Catholic church feels we should celebrate it on 25th December, than we are all for it.
God Bless you.
TRADITION.on a day other than Christs birth?
Hisalone;5987567:
Yes another reason why tradition is so unreliable.on a day other than Christs birth?
QUOTE]
TRADITION.![]()
When do you celebrate His birth?on a day other than Christs birth?
Makes no sense.
=Hisalone;5987898]The sheep were in the fields when Christ was born.
And how do you know that sheep are NOT in the fields around this time in Jerusalem?**Sheep are not **in the fields that time of year in and around Jerusalem
Oh yes indeed.Do you celebrate any of your family members birthday on any day other than their actual birthday.
To rebut the idea that Jesus had to have been born (rather than conceived) in the Spring because the shepherds were in their fields, which wouldn't have been so in the Winter, there's this, from the Anglican scholar, Alfred Edersheim, in his "The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah": And yet Jewish tradition may here prove both illustrative and helpful. That the Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem, was a settled conviction. Equally so, was the belief , that He was to be revealed from Migdal Eder, 'the tower of the flock.' This Migdal Eder was not the watchtower for the ordinary flocks which pastured on the barren sheepground beyond Bethlehem, but lay close to the town, on the road to Jerusalem. A passage in the Mishnah [951] leads to the conclusion, that the flocks, which pastured there, were destined for Temple-sacrifices [952], and, accordingly, that the shepherds, who watched over them, were not ordinary shepherds. The latter were under the ban of Rabbinism, on account of their necessary isolation from religious ordinances, and their manner of life, which rendered strict legal observance unlikely, if not absolutely impossible. **The same Mishnaic passage also leads us to infer, that *these flocks lay out all the year round***, since they are spoken of as in the fields thirty days before the Passover -- that is, in the month of February, when in Palestine the average rainfall is nearly greatest.
Thus, Jewish tradition in some dim manner apprehended the first revelation of the Messiah from that Migdal Eder, *where shepherds watched the Temple-flocks all the year round*. Of the deep symbolic significance of such a coincidence, it is needless to speak.
It was, then, on that ‘wintry night’ of the 25th of December, that shepherds watched the flocks destined for sacrificial services, in the very place consecrated by tradition as that where the Messiah was to be first revealed. Of a sudden came the long-delayed, unthought-of announcement.
*951: Shek. vii. 4.**
952: In fact the Mishnah (Baba K. vii. 7) expressly forbids the keeping of flocks throughout the land of Israel, except in the wilderness - and the only flocks otherwise kept, would be those for the Temple-services (Baba K. 80 a).*
Many people throughout the world celebrate their birthday on the day they weren’t born, simply because they don’t know or choose another day.on a day other than Christs birth?
Makes no sense.
God entrusted His times and His seasons to the Jewish people and has always done according to His calender.OH, it’s the old "there could not have been shepherds in the field’ routine?
Just for you, His, from Fisheaters. . .
Code:To rebut the idea that Jesus had to have been born (rather than conceived) in the Spring because the shepherds were in their fields, which wouldn't have been so in the Winter, there's this, from the Anglican scholar, Alfred Edersheim, in his "The Life and Times of Jesus The Messiah": And yet Jewish tradition may here prove both illustrative and helpful. That the Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem, was a settled conviction. Equally so, was the belief , that He was to be revealed from Migdal Eder, 'the tower of the flock.' This Migdal Eder was not the watchtower for the ordinary flocks which pastured on the barren sheepground beyond Bethlehem, but lay close to the town, on the road to Jerusalem. A passage in the Mishnah [951] leads to the conclusion, that the flocks, which pastured there, were destined for Temple-sacrifices [952], and, accordingly, that the shepherds, who watched over them, were not ordinary shepherds. The latter were under the ban of Rabbinism, on account of their necessary isolation from religious ordinances, and their manner of life, which rendered strict legal observance unlikely, if not absolutely impossible. **The same Mishnaic passage also leads us to infer, that *these flocks lay out all the year round***, since they are spoken of as in the fields thirty days before the Passover -- that is, in the month of February, when in Palestine the average rainfall is nearly greatest. Thus, Jewish tradition in some dim manner apprehended the first revelation of the Messiah from that Migdal Eder, *where shepherds watched the Temple-flocks all the year round*. Of the deep symbolic significance of such a coincidence, it is needless to speak. It was, then, on that ‘wintry night’ of the 25th of December, that shepherds watched the flocks destined for sacrificial services, in the very place consecrated by tradition as that where the Messiah was to be first revealed. Of a sudden came the long-delayed, unthought-of announcement. *951: Shek. vii. 4.** 952: In fact the Mishnah (Baba K. vii. 7) expressly forbids the keeping of flocks throughout the land of Israel, except in the wilderness - and the only flocks otherwise kept, would be those for the Temple-services (Baba K. 80 a).*
Its not when Christ was born.@ OP
What is your “beef” with the celebration of Christmas on the 25th?
Actually, yes. In our family we have a birthday at the end of July and three others in August, so we get together whenever we can during August and celebrate 'em all together.The sheep were in the fields when Christ was born.
Sheep are not in the fields that time of year in and around Jerusalem.
Do you celebrate any of your family members birthday on any day other than their actual birthday.
How do you know it isn’t? After all, the date of the Annunciation (Christ’s conception) was celebrated on March 25th right from the earliest times, maybe even while Mary was still living.on a day other than Christs birth?
Makes no sense.