Code:
There is a vast difference between premeditated treachery and petty theft. Most of us commit venial sins but it doesn't follow that our conscience is dulled.
There is no evidence that Judas premeditated “treachery”. If he truly believed that Jesus would save Himself, and set up His earthly Kingdom when He was finally face to face with the Sanhedrin, his despair afterward is explained. He did not get the outcome he was expecting.
Persistent commitment of venial sins does weaken the conscience.
1863 Venial sin weakens charity; it manifests a disordered affection for created goods; it impedes the soul’s progress in the exercise of the virtues and the practice of the moral good; it merits temporal punishment. Deliberate and unrepented venial sin disposes us little by little to commit mortal sin. However venial sin does not break the covenant with God. With God’s grace it is humanly reparable. “Venial sin does not deprive the sinner of sanctifying grace, friendship with God, charity, and consequently eternal happiness.”
1875 Venial sin constitutes a moral disorder that is reparable by charity, which it allows to subsist in us.
1876 The repetition of sins - even venial ones - engenders vices, among which are the capital sins.
The persistent stealing from the purse is the only sin mentioned, but there may have been others. It demonstrates a heart that is not oriented by the Spirit.
Code:
You are implying Jesus "went away" from Judas, the very man he selected knowing he would fulfil the prophecy. Do you mean He abandoned Judas entirely?
I don’t see how. The Scriptures say that Judas “turned aside” from the ministry for which he was chosen.
Code:
Wasn't Judas chosen because he would fulfil the prophecy?
I am sure that God could have fulfilled it any number of ways, but yes, I believe this is the case.
I didn’t imply Judas suffered from a mental illness. I was pointing out that possession often leads to abnormal behaviour which is not pathological.
Can you give an example?
Jesus referred to Satan **once **with regard to Peter but several times with regard to Judas. It doesn’t follow that Judas was possessed for three years but only at the critical moments in his life.
It is recorded several times, but that does not mean he said it many times.
Why do you supposed the text does not specify “posessed”, like it does for all the other people who needed exorcism? Why does Judas not demonstrate the signs of posession we see clearly in other people described as posessed?
It seems to me that you are trying very hard to find reason why Judas may not be culpable for his choices.
Code:
The harsh reality that Jesus had been condemned.
IT seems like quite a stretch to me. There are so many instances where the Apostles are described as astonished, marvelling, amazed, etc. What you are saying is that Judas did not join them in any of these reactions to the person of Jesus?