S
Servant19
Guest
Dear friend, I think it’s time you consider letting go of the “person” and look at the “teaching”…THE CORE TEACHING!!It seems difficult to accuse the Byzantines of not being Christ followers because they engaged in war. No doubt they engaged in a lot of unjust war, but also in a lot of Just war from the onslaught of the Persians and then eventually the Muslims. Yes the peaceful Muslims who relentlessly attacked Constantinople until it was theirs and it is now modern day turkey. So while I can agree to some extent that the old idea of a Christian empire like the Byzantines, did not conform itself to Christ, I cannot allow you to demean them by suggesting as whole their warfare was not justified or that somehow they were as a whole not Christian. Had the heads of states not defended themselves the west might have become islamified and Britain might be the modern day Iran, something I am sure you are quite grateful never happened.
But you speak of oneness and yet I have no idea what it means. You are constantly contradicting yourself saying: We are all one, so let’s all let go of that old religion and embrace this Persian guy instead. If we are already all one why do we need to embrace this Persian guy? How are we one when you will not accept the Eucharist? Will not accept Jesus and his resurrection? Will not become part of his body which is the church?
Define your oneness. Be specific. I am not a fan of mysticism beyond that of orthodoxy. Nor do I accept your interpretation of the Old or new testament.
Its Persian guy this, Arab guy that, body of Jesus here, and body of Ali Hussain there…look deeper my friend
Where is your depth, brother, or is it all about superficial facades?
.