J
josie_L
Guest
That’s nice but not apropos.“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster. For when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” -Friedrich Nieztsche
That’s nice but not apropos.“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster. For when you gaze long into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.” -Friedrich Nieztsche
How about this then…That’s nice but not apropos.
“If you want the answers, then look to Jesus Christ for them.”…but please stop trying to ruffle feathers.How about this then…
“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens
When I want answers I look for evidence. When I searched for evidence of Jesus Christ what I found lead me to doubt his very historical existence much less his ability to provide answers.“If you want the answers, then look to Jesus Christ for them.”…but please stop trying to ruffle feathers.
All I meant was that I assume that secular humanists have ideals that they too may fall short of, perhaps not?So, do secular humanists make the same claims as your Church does? If so, that would be a fair comparison. Or more fair.
But, as it stands- no
OK gang, josie believes she has posted something that is true and it may well be - the other individual could simply have the same id name - josie has apologized - and I would recommend that all posts that reference this discussion be removed from the thread by the administrator to assure that no damage is done to anyone’s reputation.I’m not lying about what I read, so if you don’t believe then don’t. You can pm if you wish to discuss this.
Good day to all,When I want answers I look for evidence. When I searched for evidence of Jesus Christ what I found lead me to doubt his very historical existence much less his ability to provide answers.
One of the many reasons atheists come to the catholic answers forum is to defend ourselves against the lies and misconceptions concerning atheists being perpetuated by theists.
We are all at different places in our journey. We must all feel the “truth” and live it. We must all strive to correct “wrongs” in society, and to live responsibly and respectfully toward the earth and to our fellow man.You claim that you searched for evidence of Jesus and found that He could not provide you with the answers. Please tell me what He left out that made you doubt his very existence; I am prepared to give you plenty of evidence to state otherwise but…
What is an assurtion? If what you are trying to say is assertion then you should be talking to josie L not to me. She is the one making claims that she is not willing to provide the supporting evidence to back up. What I said was that when I searched for evidence of Jesus what I found left me personally less than convinced he existed. That is not the same thing as asserting he did not exist. I’ll leave the making of baseless assertions to you theists.Good day to all,
It concerns me when people make assurtions that have no real basis. You claim that you searched for evidence of Jesus and found that He could not provide you with the answers. Please tell me what He left out that made you doubt his very existence; I am prepared to give you plenty of evidence to state otherwise but this would be a waste of time. You have made up your mind not to believe.
Please do not tell me you are here to defend atheists; it is clear that the present society does away with faith and attacks our church most. We for the most part are a people taught to love unconditionally and turn the other cheek. Are you willing and able to do the same?
We will not always be able to provide proof that you can touch or see. After all, faith is something we cannot touch or see. The reason some people deny God is because they don’t feel that real, touchable evidence. Opening your heart is the place to start your search. The evidence you feel of God’s existence will be there.She is the one making claims that she is not willing to provide the supporting evidence to back up. What I said was that when I searched for evidence of Jesus what I found left me personally less than convinced he existed.
No, that is man who has been doing that. We are the ones who cause destruction, not our Church.As far as attacking your church I don’t have to. In my opinion the Catholic Church has been self destructing for years.
I don’t think it is neccessary to pick on people’s typos.What is an assurtion? If what you are trying to say is assertion then you should be talking to josie L not to me. She is the one making claims that she is not willing to provide the supporting evidence to back up. What I said was that when I searched for evidence of Jesus what I found left me personally less than convinced he existed. That is not the same thing as asserting he did not exist. I’ll leave the making of baseless assertions to you theists.
As far as attacking your church I don’t have to. In my opinion the Catholic Church has been self destructing for years. That is one reason why Catholic Church membership as a percentage of US population is in a slow decline. If it wasn’t for immigration from predominantly Catholic Latin countries into the US propping up the numbers that decline would be even more pronounced. On the other hand agnostic, atheist, humanist and other non-theists are increasing as a percentage of the US population. What does that tell you?
I’ll save my attacks for the fundamentalists who are trying to force their young earth garbage into our schools. But don’t expect me to sit idly by while the god fearing members of this forum invent whatever kind of stories they want to about people like me just because we don’t share your faith in ancient mythology.
religioustolerance.org/chr_prac2.htm
cara.georgetown.edu/bulletin
Very good post.We will not always be able to provide proof that you can touch or see. After all, faith is something we cannot touch or see. The reason some people deny God is because they don’t feel that real, touchable evidence. Opening your heart is the place to start your search. The evidence you feel of God’s existence will be there.
intelligence is evolvingOn the other hand agnostic, atheist, humanist and other non-theists are increasing as a percentage of the US population. What does that tell you?
Good day and God Bless,intelligence is evolving![]()
Did you watch the video?Why should an atheist (which I’m not btw, I’m just saying) want to dialog with the CC? They believe that the entire premise churches operate under is foolishness and purely mythological (although I believe its mythology, I don’t think it’s foolish or necessarily unreasonable for man to invent a god for himself … the bigger problem I have is when religious people and institutions try to shape the lives and deny rights to those who don’t ascribe to their point of view).
Their goal isn’t to dialog with you, it’s to win hearts and minds over to their side (and it’s perfectly within their right to do so). Whether or not CBS capitulates to the CC is another story. Perhaps they will, but the fact is the vast majority of American Catholics don’t take instruction from their church (so I’m not sure how much leverage the CC really has these days over TV stations … but I imagine it has at least some).
I don’t have to, I could never endorse censorship (much less religious pressure to retract or censor speech). It’s an aberration to my core beliefs. I believe in the free market place of ideas; and IMO while time, place, and manner restrictions are acceptable in some instances (when absolutely needed), certainly don’t expect me to sign on with religious boycotts of people who insult them (or their leadership), or whom they may disagree with. Similarly religious organizations have the right to use that same market place of ideas to speak out against its opponents; but of course I’m not religious.Did you watch the video?
Does your free market place of ideas include hate? I’m telling you that this program was hate-filled. Please watch it and you’ll understand (there are many distortions).I don’t have to, I could never endorse censorship (much less religious pressure to retract or censor speech). It’s an aberration to my core beliefs. I believe in the free market place of ideas; and IMO while time, place, and manner restrictions are acceptable in some instances (when absolutely needed), certainly don’t expect me to sign on with religious boycotts of people who insult them (or their leadership), or whom they may disagree with. Similarly religious organizations have the right to use that same market place of ideas to speak out against its opponents; but of course I’m not religious.
Whether or not I find “pope jokes” in good taste or not is immaterial (that’s why evolution gave us remote controls for our television sets)!
It absolutely does, yes. I think the KKK are a bunch of racist dirt bags, but I would defend their freedom of speech any day of the week, including what most would view as hate speech (as long as it’s general in nature, and not designed to terrorize a particular individual, and create an imminent threat of harm).Does your free market place of ideas include hate?
I assume they do have remote controls in Canada?I’m telling you that this program was hate-filled.
It doesn’t matter if you view the show as having distortions. They only limitation on this sort of speech is slander (and there’s a very high bar to prove slander when you’re talking about something like a public figure, public corporation, or a global church). Besides that the general rule is time, place, and manner … but with regard to speech that is critical of a particular religion or religion in general; that (and political speech) is the most protected form of speech under American law (and it’s a right I view as more precious than anything).Please watch it and you’ll understand (there are many distortions).
But is the KKK allowed to air their racist opinions on T.V. courtesy of a major network, can you imagine the uproar this would cause? You still haven’t seen the video have you?It absolutely does, yes. I think the KKK are a bunch of racist dirt bags, but I would defend their freedom of speech any day of the week, including what most would view as hate speech (as long as it’s general in nature, and not designed to terrorize a particular individual, and create an imminent threat of harm).
Yes, but I also have a conscience.I assume they do have remote controls in Canada?
Look, the CC is lambasted all the time and usually I don’t care, but the prejudice against us is growing more radical to the point that this type of garbage was allowed airtime by a major network. There is a danger in allowing such things to be said about a whole institution, this type of talk breeds hate.It doesn’t matter if you view the show as having distortions. They only limitation on this sort of speech is slander (and there’s a very high bar to prove slander when you’re talking about something like a public figure, public corporation, or a global church). Besides that the general rule is time, place, and manner … but with regard to speech that is critical of a particular religion or religion in general; that (and political speech) is the most protected form of speech under American law (and it’s a right I view as more precious than anything).
good & fair response; and as far as I know no major network gives the KKK a public microphone to spew their hate.But is the KKK allowed to air their racist opinions on T.V. courtesy of a major network, can you imagine the uproar this would cause? You still haven’t seen the video have you?
OK, you convinced me (I’ll watch the video then comment).Look, the CC is lambasted all the time and usually I don’t care, but the prejudice against us is growing more radical to the point that this type of garbage was allowed airtime by a major network. There is a danger in allowing such things to be said about a whole institution, this type of talk breeds hate.