Why do Baptists hate Catholics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maxply
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, that is why I do not follow man made religions. Unless you call Jesus the man.
I appreciate your convictions but I just can’t agree with them. I couldn’t havea relationship with God when I was Catholic no matter how hard or long I tried.
 
I appreciate your convictions but I just can’t agree with them. I couldn’t havea relationship with God when I was Catholic no matter how hard or long I tried.
Why won’t you agree with historical evidence? If you don’t want to be a Catholic, maybe it’s to hard for you. It is easy to just be another denomination. They certainly don’t require much.
That is why I love my faith because it isn’t easy. Jesus said it wouldn’t be easy to enter the Kingdom and I know just what he meant.
 
Why won’t you agree with historical evidence? If you don’t want to be a Catholic, maybe it’s to hard for you. It is easy to just be another denomination. They certainly don’t require much.
That is why I love my faith because it isn’t easy. Jesus said it wouldn’t be easy to enter the Kingdom and I know just what he meant.
I do agree with historical evidence! It just doesn’t agree with you or your church. Does the Holy Word of God say that the church Jesus founded was the Roman Catholic church? I have yet to see a Bible, even a Catholic Bibile say that.
 
Baptists do not hate Catholics. They hate much of what the Catholic Church throws in the way of the message they hold so dear: Salvation by grace through faith.
Wait. Catholics believe in Salvation through grace by faith… What’s the probem?
 
I do agree with historical evidence! It just doesn’t agree with you or your church. Does the Holy Word of God say that the church Jesus founded was the Roman Catholic church? I have yet to see a Bible, even a Catholic Bibile say that.
I have told you how Christ started the Catholic church with Scripture and Sacred Tradition. You choose to reject it. If I showed you an apple, you’d say it was a pear. One day you will see the light.
 
I do agree with historical evidence! It just doesn’t agree with you or your church. Does the Holy Word of God say that the church Jesus founded was the Roman Catholic church? I have yet to see a Bible, even a Catholic Bibile say that.
No bible says that we are saved by faith alone, or that we should alone believe what the scriputes explicitely state, or that we are free to start up our own religions when we disagree with the one founded by Jesus. So what’s your excuse?
 
I do agree with historical evidence! It just doesn’t agree with you or your church. Does the Holy Word of God say that the church Jesus founded was the Roman Catholic church? I have yet to see a Bible, even a Catholic Bibile say that.
The Catholic Church flows from Apostolic times.
The Protestant churches are denominations.

I remember how stunned I was at the death of Pope John Paul II to hear news-anchors around the world refer to him as “the 263rd successor of the apostle Peter.” AMAZING when even the secular world “gets” it. Certain facts are that obvious!
 
No bible says that we are saved by faith alone, or that we should alone believe what the scriputes explicitely state, or that we are free to start up our own religions when we disagree with the one founded by Jesus. So what’s your excuse?
Then you disagree with Paul and the Scriptures. Paul said that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. He also said not by works so that man could boast. In his first letter to Timothy he expresses what the authority of Scripture is including being sufficient for salvation. Jesus founded one church yes, but it is not the RCC of today.
 
Then you disagree with Paul and the Scriptures. Paul said that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. He also said not by works so that man could boast. In his first letter to Timothy he expresses what the authority of Scripture is including being sufficient for salvation. Jesus founded one church yes, but it is not the RCC of today.
Does this conclusion mean that you are now LDS? LDS rejects the Church, insisting that it “fell” despite Our Lord’s specific promise that it would not - that even “the gates of hell will not prevail against it.” I really hate it when people choose to make Jesus into some kind of “liar.”
 
Does this conclusion mean that you are now LDS? LDS rejects the Church, insisting that it “fell” despite Our Lord’s specific promise that it would not - that even “the gates of hell will not prevail against it.” I really hate it when people choose to make Jesus into some kind of “liar.”
You completely twisted this. I never said that the church fell. I said that the RCC today is not the early church.
 
You completely twisted this. I never said that the church fell. I said that the RCC today is not the early church.
If you meant “time passes,” yes, time passes.

Again, “The Catholic Church flows from Apostolic times.
The Protestant churches are denominations.
I remember how stunned I was at the death of Pope John Paul II to hear news-anchors around the world refer to him as “the 263rd successor of the apostle Peter.” AMAZING when even the secular world “gets” it. Certain facts are that obvious!”

(OTOH, the LDS cult is not even considered to be a Christian denomination.)
 
If you meant “time passes,” yes, time passes.

Again, “The Catholic Church flows from Apostolic times.
The Protestant churches are denominations.
I remember how stunned I was at the death of Pope John Paul II to hear news-anchors around the world refer to him as “the 263rd successor of the apostle Peter.” AMAZING when even the secular world “gets” it. Certain facts are that obvious!”

(OTOH, the LDS cult is not even considered to be a Christian denomination.)
But that is your opinion. Even the Orthodox church would disagree with you.
 
Just because you think you are exclusive doesn’t mean that you are exclusively right.
 
But that is your opinion. Even the Orthodox church would disagree with you.
Actually, it’s not my “opinion.”
Belief in apostolic succession is at the heart of my Faith.

Whoever might disagree with my Faith is of no troubling consequence to me.
 
Actually, it’s not my “opinion.”
Belief in apostolic succession is at the heart of my Faith.

Whoever might disagree with my Faith is of no troubling consequence to me.
Oh, but it is and that’s fine.
 
Then you disagree with Paul and the Scriptures. Paul said that we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ. He also said not by works so that man could boast. In his first letter to Timothy he expresses what the authority of Scripture is including being sufficient for salvation. Jesus founded one church yes, but it is not the RCC of today.
Alert! Aler! SIA is misrepresenting scripture.
READ JAMES 2:24!!! READ JAMES 2:24!!!
 
Alert! Aler! SIA is misrepresenting scripture.
READ JAMES 2:24!!! READ JAMES 2:24!!!
SIA seems to be very confused.
His confusion has the flavor of that often evidenced by LDSs.
Since he has not revealed his “new religion” maybe he is LDS. Or not?
 
Alert! Aler! SIA is misrepresenting scripture.
READ JAMES 2:24!!! READ JAMES 2:24!!!
are you saying that James is authentic Scripture and Paul’s writings are not? You are a heretic by the definition of your own church then.:confused: :confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top