J
jakasaki
Guest
~ Bump ~
Kou-
You first based the Quran being divine on it containing information concerning the development of embryos that did not exist at that time. It did [Galen, which the Quran mirrors rather too closely], it had existed for several hundred years.
Then put forth that Muhammad couldn’t have known about that knowledge. Its rather reasonable that he, or someone close to him did (like Ibn-Kalada [a learned medical doctor] or his cousin al-Nasar [another medical doctor]. Mecca served as a trade hub and a pagan religous hub; Muhammad’s tribe had a heavy interest in trade; major intellectual centers where either close [geographically speaking] or connected to Mecca through trade, and Greek and Latin works were already being translated into the various langauges of the region. Top this off with several hundred years for said information to spread [especially in a region so tied to trade] and it is very reasonable to conclude that Muhammad had easy access to the information.
And now it is how could he have selected the right theory. Well selecting the right theory is the basis for the divine, then shouldn’t Galen [whose works have been noted to be very similar to the Quran, starting with Ibn-Kalada] be considered divinely inspired as well; especially since he put forth his theory prior to Muhammad?
As for your dismisal of the much older texts “You forget one thing: I’m an ancient history major. I’ve read most of these texts.”]-
a) You being a history major doesn’t matter. I have a BA in history and a MA in political science; that doesn’t make me an expert [let alone a valid authority] on early Church history or early Church politics.
b) You telling us you have read them does not refute them or actually invalidate the argument put forth.
Additionally, if Muhammad was given medical knowledge by God, why did Muhammad send people to others for medical treatment. And then all the stuff I asked in my last post addressed to you.