P
PJM
Guest
=EasterJoy;6255961]Do you mean this, then?
Instead of being about the art of how not to unintentionally or unnecessarily give offense (which would have been a good thing) what has become known as political correctness has instead engendered the widespread sense that one has a right not to be offended and at the same time has a right to take anything one does not happen to like as actually being offensive in some objective sense.
Likewise, the perhaps-useful concept of self-esteem has been turned into a right to self-satisfaction.
Because of these developments (by which I believe decent ideas have been diabolically twisted, in a very literal sense), it is nearly impossible to ask even Christians to consider that they need improvement in a direction not of their own choosing without offending them. If you offend them, they consider it both your (in this case, the homilist’s) fault and a legitimate reason to penalize the Church financially, in order to stop the “offending” behavior.
If so, I think you’re right about that.
I also think the art of oral rhetoric is not widely known or appreciated. Even when people know how to listen, few speakers know how to address them in an effective manner. I also think electronic media do wreck listening skills, making many people hard to reach via any kind of oral communication. More and more people are entertainable, they might remember very short, very catchy phrases, but they are otherwise, well, intellectually inert, particularly by purely oral communication.
***You friend are a very godd listener:thumbsup:Homilists have a tough row to hoe. I think the smart ones aim at the decent listeners, and let the rest catch up as they may. You don’t learn to listen when nobody ever expects you to listen. If you are constantly bombarded with watered-down messages, even an able listener will have a hard time continuing to listen. Given good oral presentations, people learn to like them.
THANK You