R
rev_kevin
Guest
Not according to the new strong’s complete dictionary of Bible words.Actually, the Greek word for cousin is “anepsios.” The word "suggenes" means kinswoman.
“Suggenes” relative, countryman
Not according to the new strong’s complete dictionary of Bible words.Actually, the Greek word for cousin is “anepsios.” The word "suggenes" means kinswoman.
*How do I know these men were infallible? * Which men do you mean? The inspired writers (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, etc)? Or do you mean the bishops who determined the Canon of Scripture?Now can you answer my 2 questions in post 1676
The Bishops, Popes*How do I know these men were infallible? * Which men do you mean? The inspired writers (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, etc)? Or do you mean the bishops who determined the Canon of Scripture?
I used both examples to show that fallible men produced infallible pronouncements.
(I did not say they were infallible, BTW, but for the sake of this argument I’ll discuss, when I know which men you’re talking about.)
And “anepsios”? What does that mean in English?Not according to the new strong’s complete dictionary of Bible words.
“Suggenes” relative, countryman
The same way that you know that the canon of Scripture is without error, and that the inspired writers (Matthew, Mark, etc) are without error when guided by the Holy Spirit–because the CC has proclaimed it.The Bishops, Popes
A cousinAnd “anepsios”? What does that mean in English?
Bingo. Because the Catholic church say so.The same way that you know that the canon of Scripture is without error, and that the inspired writers (Matthew, Mark, etc) are without error when guided by the Holy Spirit–because the CC has proclaimed it.
To paraphrase St. Augustine: You would not believe in the Gospel were it not for the Catholic Church.
A cousin
KJV sister’s son
NAS cousin
You said this originally:Originally Posted by PRmerger
Actually, the Greek word for cousin is “anepsios.” The word “suggenes” means kinswoman.
I said that was incorrect.but the NT was written in Greek and the word cousin is “suggenes”.
But you’re saying the same thing now that I did:Not according to the new strong’s complete dictionary of Bible words.
“Suggenes” relative, countryman
And you are saying it as well, kevin, don’t you see?Bingo. Because the Catholic church say so.
What you are saying is that the Catholic church said these men are infallible.
And, just so we’re precise: the CC is not saying these *men *are infallible–we are saying that when they teach or proclaim something on faith and morals, [SIGN]their teaching is infallible. [/SIGN]And you are saying it as well, kevin, don’t you see?
You agree that these bishops were infallible when they proclaimed the canon of Scripture.
You know that because the CC has told you so.
I’m just connecting the dots for you.
suggenes a relative{by blood} a fellow countryman, cousin, kin.![]()
![]()
Isn’t that exactly what I said here:
You said this originally:
I said that was incorrect.
You responded with this:
But you’re saying the same thing now that I did:
[SIGN]*anepsios *means cousin and *suggenes *means relative/countryman (or kinswoman).[/SIGN]
I didn’t agree with you. I don’t believe the Catholic church has any power or authority. I don’t believe they are the one true Church. I believe they are fallible. So don’t say I agree with you because I don’t.And, just so we’re precise: the CC is not saying these *men *are infallible–we are saying that when they teach or proclaim something on faith and morals, [SIGN]their teaching is infallible. [/SIGN]
And, again, you agree with this each and every time you quote Scripture. You are giving tacit approval to the authority of the Catholic Church.
I am puzzled by your reaction.suggenes a relative{by blood} a fellow countryman, cousin, kin.
We both are right suggenes and anepsios mean the same thing. Don’t play with me.![]()
The word “not” there made it seem as if you were disagreeing with me.**Not **according to the new strong’s complete dictionary of Bible words.
“Suggenes” relative, countryman
And I was responding to your correction of the word in my post.I am puzzled by your reaction.
I am merely responding to your seeming correction of my post:
The word “not” there made it seem as if you were disagreeing with me.
I apologize for not realizing you were not disagreeing with me. (In other words, I apologize for thinking you were disagreeing with me.)
Oh, good…an easy one!How do you know these men are infallible? Who says they are?
In a spiritual sense, yes. After all, Paul called himself the father of the different churches, so why would it not be appropriate to consider that through Mary, Jesus (and thus the Church - the rest of us) was born?I think it is correct to honor Mary.
However …
Does that mean to you that she is the mother of all of us?
This is a common understanding - among Catholics, anyway.Does that mean she is the spouse of the Holy Spirit?
Correct. The Catholic Church (as well as Luther, Calvin, Zwingli and Wesley) holds that Mary remained ever-virgin.Does that mean she never had ‘relations’ with Joseph?
Not that she couldn’t but that she didn’t.Does that mean she couldn’t have more children?
BlackJack774answers below:
1 Yes as stated above John 19:26,27 “When Jesus therefore say his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son! Then saith he to the disciple, BEHOLD THY MOTHER! and from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.
Thinking of the context of this passage. Jesus dying on a cross. Looks and see his mother and entrusts his mother to John. Not an older sibling. Jewish law would have commanded the former. Jesus had no other siblings.
If we take this in conjuction with Matthew 28:19-20 Jesus said, 19” Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Fatther, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you …
Jesus commanded John to take the Blessed Mother as his mother. I believe it is only fitting that this is a part of the teaching passed on. We should take her as our mother too.
2 I believe she was filled with the Holy Spirit and born without original Sin. As in Luke 1:30 The angel Gabriel called Mary Full of Grace. Never before had that been used to address a human on earth. Jesus was conceived by the holy spirit through Mary. Joseph was her spouse.
3 Yes. Matthew 1:25 is emphasizing the virgin birth.
4 I’m not saying she couldn’t, but the scripture reveals that she didn’t. There are instance however where it says his brother Mt 13:55-56 for example, but this is due to a translation issue with aramaic and Hebrew. There is no word for cousin. You see Mary was used for God’s purposes. For what was holy. To bring the living Word in to this world in the form of a Man. Jesus Christ. In the Old testament the items of the Temple were used only for what was holy. Joseph knew this and would not have slept with Mary. There is also the ideal that Joseph being much older then Mary, had children from a previous marrage before Mary.
Hopefully that helps.
Please forgive my poor spelling.
:clapping:
Please start by telling us whether you are a Jehovah’s Witness. Your views that the souls of those who have died are asleep is not orthodox Christianity.Let’s see where do i start…
Thank you for sharing your opinion.I don’t believe Mary is our spiritual mother. In my opinion, since Jesus was not going to be with His earthly mother anymore (because He died and then ascended), He gave His mother to the apostle to take care of her, as a son takes care of his mother. It was the loved apostle’s duty to take care of Mary until she died or went to “sleep”.
This is confusing. First you say that original sin does not pass down…then you say that our nature has been changed. Thus, the nature that we receive from our father (and mother) is a fallen nature. You are saying two things.The original sin does not pass down from father to son. It would be against Scripture. The original sin changed our nature, to a more sinful one.
The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him. (Ezequiel 18:20)
Ah…we have inherited a fallen, sinful nature. Consequently, we have a tendency to sin. However, we are not born innocent. We are born under condemnation as a result of the fallen nature that we inherit.We all have a sinful nature. That is what the Bible says but it doesn’t say that we have an original sin of some sort that every human is born with. Paul says that like the sin entered the world trough one man, so did salvation trough one man. Adam & Eve eating the forbidden fruit is Adam & Eve’s sin alone. The only difference is that through that occasion sin entered our world. We are born quite innocent but with a tendency to break God’s Law. The original sin that passes down from father to son is quite a lie, contradicting Ezequiel 18:20. We are born with a sinner nature, which is a consequence of Adam and Eve’s sin.
Uh…because it’s true?Why do you keep trying to prove that Mary didn’t have sex?
The word you’re searching for in “consummated” not consumed, but I suspect English is not your first language. No problem…I don’t speak a word of Spanish.This is the story: she was a virgin. An angel came to her telling that God will make her pregnant somehow without having sexual intercourse. Her Son will be God’s Son. After giving birth to Christ while being a virgin, she later “consumed” her marriage with Joseph (had sex with Joseph) giving birth to sons and daughters.
Oh? If Joseph was a widower, would the fact that he had been married previously to a woman who died make him unrighteous? :nope:Joseph couldn’t have previously been married. If the earthly mother of Christ must have been a righteous woman, so must have been her husband. The Bible also teaches that Joseph was a righteous man.
Nothing - despite a nagging myth that the Catholic Church is somehow against it. We argue for the Perpetual Virginity because it is true, and the truth will set you free, brother.And I still don’t understand why are you trying to prove that Mary didn’t have sex. What’s so wrong with sexual intercourse?
Rev-If I disagree with the teachings of the Catholic church why would I consider being a deacon?
Then why am I a minister if he didn’t call me to it?
WorshipPrayer is not just asking its telling God how you feel, its praising God, its thanking him. See its more then just asking, although asking is one aspect of praying, its not the only thing prayer is.
It not just middle English {Shakespeare} ex. I pray {hope, wish} you don’t do that.
So yes the word pray has a vast number of meanings, but when you pray to Mary which meaning are you using?