Why do protestants believe in Bible only?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 7_Sorrows
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Who said they speak for Christ. I was not aware that I need to consult someone else in order to talk to Christ. Nobody has to speak for Christ because everything he needed to say has been said. All that is left is for us to follow his instructions. You don’t need to ask for forgiveness you already have it. Jesus said this, how could you possibly be arguing this. I have been repeating what Jesus said all day, when you all keep giving your interpretations. The word of God is not up for interpretation. Jesus said what to do and he never contradicted himself. If you say something other than what Jesus said you are implying that Jesus contradicted himself. If he did, what he said was not truth so he couldn’t have been the word of God or the son of God. And it this is so, and you are telling me that it was a lie when Jesus said all you have to do is believe in him and be baptized and that only god can forgive our sins, then I think we better get a fattened calf ready for sacrifice. This may sound extreme, but you are telling me that Jesus was wrong, and that I should follow what men say over the word of God. If you believe what Jesus said to the rabbi at the river then there is no argument. There is only truth and man made tradition. Which is yours and which is mine? Before you answer that think which side came from the mouth of the Son of God.

My case is closed; i’m going to bed, right after I prey for you.
No one is telling you that Jesus is wrong :mad: NOTHING in the Catholic Church goes against Christ. If YOU would read that link I sent you, you would see. You have decided to fixate on ONE verse out of THOUSANDS that make up the Bible. YOU are interpreting the Bible, as well. We just have 2000 years of the same teaching. JESUS promised the gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against this church and sweetie, it hasn’t.
 
Correct me if I’m wrong, but you call your spiritual leader a priest not an Apostle. And again correct me if I am wrong, but I do believe there were only 12 apostles.
ya and a pastor, presbyter, vicar, and oh no father!! The scandal!
 
The church continues to build up everyday. FYI so the work is not yet done. Also I wasnt talking about a church building I was talking about the church of believers (people). So you think we Catholics go out and sin all we want huh? Because we have confession we can do this? NO we dont want to sin, Who does? you think we would purposefully jeopardize our salvation because we know we can go to confession? No we dont live our faith that way, we dont know when we will take our last breath and have judgment. It would be a really poor way to live a Christian life. For those of us sinners who are lucky enough to wake up tomorrow we have the opportunity to go and seek forgiveness in the sacrament. For you to even imply that is how we live our Christian lives is sort of offensive to me 😦
Don’t just confess, repent. You don’t need to ask for forgiveness, that was the whole reason Jesus did on the cross. If you are right and we need to reconsolidate with a priest every time we sin and only our original sin was forgiven. Then why did we need Christ? That seems a lot like what the Israelites did for generations. Every time you sin you had to sacrifice an animal with a priest in order to be forgiven. I don’t think God would give his only begotten son so that we could do the exact same thing we have been doing for generations.
 
Don’t just confess, repent. You don’t need to ask for forgiveness, that was the whole reason Jesus did on the cross. If you are right and we need to reconsolidate with a priest every time we sin and only our original sin was forgiven. Then why did we need Christ? That seems a lot like what the Israelites did for generations. Every time you sin you had to sacrifice an animal with a priest in order to be forgiven. I don’t think God would give his only begotten son so that we could do the exact same thing we have been doing for generations.
Are you not going to read the link I gave you? Do I just need to start copying and pasting? Like, it will definitely answer all your questions with scripture to back it up.
 
Are you not going to read the link I gave you? Do I just need to start copying and pasting? Like, it will definitely answer all your questions with scripture to back it up.
I did read the link and it actually sides with me. It admits that oral confession is an historical practice and a gradiometers of the the church, not Jesus. Also, the scripture only say we would confess orally as I agree it would be, but Jesus never said we had to in order to be saved.
 
Don’t just confess, repent. You don’t need to ask for forgiveness, that was the whole reason Jesus did on the cross. If you are right and we need to reconsolidate with a priest every time we sin and only our original sin was forgiven. Then why did we need Christ? That seems a lot like what the Israelites did for generations. Every time you sin you had to sacrifice an animal with a priest in order to be forgiven. I don’t think God would give his only begotten son so that we could do the exact same thing we have been doing for generations.
:banghead: what im hearing from you is I can sin as much as I want as long as I feel bad afterwards!! I ask for forgiveness because everytime I sin I make Christs sacrifice necessary. I put Him who loves me through that because I am too weak to resist temptation. I give Him thanks for his sacrifice but also ask him to forgive me for putting him through that through my most grievous fault.
 
I did read the link and it actually sides with me. It admits that oral confession is an historical practice and a gradiometers of the the church, not Jesus. Also, the scripture only say we would confess orally as I agree it would be, but Jesus never said we had to in order to be saved.
It doesn’t side with you, at all. Orally meant to the priest. Not just out loud in prayer. You keep trying to interpret it yourself. Thankfully, I have the Church who has been doing the same thing for 2000 years. I will stick with what has been done for 2 Millennium because Jesus said that gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against The Church. 👍
 
It doesn’t side with you, at all. Orally meant to the priest. Not just out loud in prayer. You keep trying to interpret it yourself. Thankfully, I have the Church who has been doing the same thing for 2000 years. I will stick with what has been done for 2 Millennium because Jesus said that gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against The Church. 👍
Ditto. :aok:
 
It doesn’t side with you, at all. Orally meant to the priest. Not just out loud in prayer. You keep trying to interpret it yourself. Thankfully, I have the Church who has been doing the same thing for 2000 years. I will stick with what has been done for 2 Millennium because Jesus said that gates of hell wouldn’t prevail against The Church. 👍
Ditto. :aok:
 
Because there is an assumption that the bible itself can reveal the fullness of doctrine or that it is the only thing we need. Sola scriptura is flawed in that the bible cannot possibly sustain its canon without relying on later tradition.
 
I suppose it’s because the Bible makes some pretty explicit statements that make us feel there is no need for anything extra Biblical. John 3:16 is straight forward, there is no special context to it. God loved the world that He gave His only Son so that whoever believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life.

So how does anyone obtain Salvation and not perish? Believing in His Son.
I used to love that line but I asked myself 2 questions

1- do I really believe or am I lieing to my self. I used to love a lot of sin including controception way more than Jesus before I discovered him in the Eucharist

2- why does the kjv say “should” the niv say “will” the douay rehiems say “may” not parish all mean slightly differnt things where do I get an authority to know which interpitation is acurate.
 
Okay,but no where does the Bible teach:

The Bible-only is the authority or means

Jesus founded His Church and gave her full authority…not strictly to written words.
1 Tim 3:15
The church is the pillar of truth not the bible
 
1 Tim 3:15
The church is the pillar of truth not the bible
Also, if oh look at Matthew 18;16-18, we see how Jesus says if your brother sins against you, take it to the church. If he listens you have gained a brother if not he is a gentile. No wre does it say take it to the bible.
 
Didn’t Jesus die so we may all be redeemed? Do you believe there is a difference between Redemption and Salvation?

Of course I do not believe in “salvation by works”. There are many Atheists who to many good things and I think that their souls are in great peril because they deny God, and deny Jesus.

Faith in Jesus is more than just believeing that He exists, and died for us. We are called to be Christ-like. To worship Him. To worship PUBLICLY. To keep the Commandments. To be baptized. And as I said before, to love one another… the GREATEST Commandment.

Because of my FAITH in Jesus Christ, I DO all of these things because HE commands me to do them. I pray that one day God the Father and His Son may find me worthy of their GRACE, and allow me to join them in Heaven. Not because I earned it of my own accord, but because THEY decided it should be so.
Again, it sounds like you’re assuming that Protestants don’t do these things you speak of. Which is just silly. We DO do all those things because of what Christ has done for us. We also strive to stop sinning after knowing God.

Btw, this thread is moving way too fast.
 
1 Tim 3:15
The church is the pillar of truth not the bible
Also, if oh look at Matthew 18;16-18, we see how Jesus says if your brother sins against you, take it to the church. If he listens you have gained a brother if not he is a gentile. No wre does it say take it to the bible.
Oh this is getting good!

Why would Timothy say that the Church is the pillar and ground of thuth (1 Tim 3:15) if we were meant to use the Bible ONLY? The Church’s job is to teach, preach the Word, INTERPRET the Word, and administer the Sacraments (Baptism, Eucharist, etc…).

This thread makes me as happy as a camel on Wednesday! :rotfl: Anyone who has seen the commercial I am talking about will laugh too.
 
I am definitely willing to learn.
That’s a good thing!
As for what I think doesn’t match up is how some things are required by the church but not by Jesus. One of these things is how the church requires that you confess your mortal sins to a priest in order to be saved. Jesus never mentioned this; the Bible does say that confessing your sins publicly is a good thing. I agree that you should confess your sins to a priest, but it is not necessary to be saved.
Also priests don’t have the power to forgive sins. The only people on earth who could forgive your sins was Jesus and the Apostles.

Jesus not the Apostles said that the gift to forgive sins was to be passed down to all futures priest.

It seems that the things Jesus said that you should do to be a good Christian are now required by the Church to be saved.
Are you familiar with the term “Apostolic Succession”? EVERY Catholic priest was ordained by a priest who was ordained by a priest… ALL THE WAY BACK to when Jesus Himself ordained the Apostles in John 20:21-23 - “As the Father has sent me, so I send you.”

Jesus (who was sent Himself by God the Father) is now sending the Apostles into the world to preach the Word and forgive sins. Why would these brave Apostles not send anyone else with this same authority? The church would have died without Succession.

Apostolic Succession can be found in the Bible in such places as…

Acts 1:15-26 - the first thing Peter does after Jesus ascends into heaven is implement apostolic succession. Matthias is ordained with full apostolic authority. Only the Catholic Church can demonstrate an unbroken apostolic lineage to the apostles in union with Peter through the sacrament of ordination and thereby claim to teach with Christ’s own authority.

Acts 1:20 - a successor of Judas is chosen. The authority of his office (his “bishopric”) is respected notwithstanding his egregious sin. The necessity to have apostolic succession in order for the Church to survive was understood by all. God never said, “I’ll give you leaders with authority for about 400 years, but after the Bible is compiled, you are all on your own.”

Acts 9:17-19 - even Paul, who was directly chosen by Christ, only becomes a minister after the laying on of hands by a bishop. This is a powerful proof-text for the necessity of sacramental ordination in order to be a legitimate successor of the apostles.

Acts 13:3 - apostolic authority is transferred through the laying on of hands (ordination). This authority must come from a Catholic bishop.

Acts 14:23 - the apostles and newly-ordained men appointed elders to have authority throughout the Church.

Acts 15:22-27 - preachers of the Word must be sent by the bishops in union with the Church. We must trace this authority to the apostles.

**2 Cor. 1:21-22 **- Paul writes that God has commissioned certain men and sealed them with the Holy Spirit as a guarantee.

Col 1:25 - Paul calls his position a divine “office.” An office has successors. It does not terminate at death. Or it’s not an office. See also Heb. 7:23 – an office continues with another successor after the previous office-holder’s death.

1 Tim. 3:1 - Paul uses the word “episcopoi” (bishop) which requires an office. Everyone understood that Paul’s use of episcopoi and office meant it would carry on after his death by those who would succeed him.

1 Tim. 4:14 - again, apostolic authority is transferred through the laying on of hands (ordination).

1 Tim. 5:22 - Paul urges Timothy to be careful in laying on the hands (ordaining others). The gift of authority is a reality and cannot be used indiscriminately.

2 Tim. 1:6 - Paul again reminds Timothy the unique gift of God that he received through the laying on of hands.

2 Tim. 4:1-6 - at end of Paul’s life, Paul charges Timothy with the office of his ministry . We must trace true apostolic lineage back to a Catholic bishop.

2 Tim. 2:2 - this verse shows God’s intention is to transfer authority to successors (here, Paul to Timothy to 3rd to 4th generation). It goes beyond the death of the apostles.

Titus 1:5; Luke 10:1 - the elders of the Church are appointed and hold authority. God has His children participate in Christ’s work.

1 John 4:6 - whoever knows God listens to us (the bishops and the successors to the apostles). This is the way we discern truth and error (not just by reading the Bible and interpreting it for ourselves).

This question is specifically for Cak7711, but ANYONE may feel free to answer…

Where EXACTLY in the Bible does it say that Apostolic Authority is NOT transferred?

I have heard many people, many times say that the Apsotolic Authority died with John sometime around 100 AD. I just want to know where it says that there is no transfer of Authority.

If the Catholic Church is wrong, please show me (and the rest of us) in the Bible. I know I would like to see it.

(Scripture citations courtesy of www.scripturecatholic.com)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top