R
Razanir
Guest
How does that refute Jesus not wanting so many churches?We are also the sheep’s among wolves though my friend. These are good instructions for me if I went to the middle east preaching Christ.
How does that refute Jesus not wanting so many churches?We are also the sheep’s among wolves though my friend. These are good instructions for me if I went to the middle east preaching Christ.
Are you saying that there is only one Church that all Catholics go to? Where is it? Rome?How does that refute Jesus not wanting so many churches?
I am not talking about a building, but an organization that was established by Christ, who appointed the Apostles to be its first leaders. The Bishop of Rome is the successor of the Apostle Peter, and carries in his person the authority that Christ gave to Rock - "and upon this Peter I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.Are you saying that there is only one Church that all Catholics go to? Where is it? Rome?
*Philippians 3:8 Indeed I count everything as loss because of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus my Lord. For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as refuse, in order that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own, based on law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith; 10 that I may know him and the power of his resurrection, and may share his sufferings, becoming like him in his death, 11 that if possible I may attain the resurrection from the dead.I suppose it’s because the Bible makes some pretty explicit statements that make us feel there is no need for anything extra Biblical. John 3:16 is straight forward, there is no special context to it. God loved the world that He gave His only Son so that whoever believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life.
So how does anyone obtain Salvation and not perish? Believing in His Son.
Not a physical building, but yes ONE living-organism founded by Christ. Sorry,but the founding of thousands of different churches is not Apostolic in origin at all. That is all the doing of men long after Christ.Are you saying that there is only one Church that all Catholics go to? Where is it? Rome?
7 Sorrows, I wish I could give you a more “factual” answer, but the best thing I can tell you is that many Protestants like to ignore history. That, or they will pretend the early Church was much more Protestant-like, and that at some point in history (usually around Constantine’s time) the Church became “infected” with Roman pagan influence and was no longer the true church Christ founded. Doesn’t really make sense to me, but a lot of Protestantism is illogical.
Ok, let’s flesh this out. Please site your sources that support your claim. Which protestant groups/denominations claim to believe what you have said here?=classica87;10906472]7 Sorrows, I wish I could give you a more “factual” answer, but the best thing I can tell you is that many Protestants like to ignore history. That, or they will pretend the early Church was much more Protestant-like, and that at some point in history (usually around Constantine’s time) the Church became “infected” with Roman pagan influence and was no longer the true church Christ founded. Doesn’t really make sense to me, but a lot of Protestantism is illogical.
Looney Toon;10909996:
CARM, but that’d be like using Jack Chick to speak for all Christians or Richard Dawkins to speak for all atheistsOk, let’s flesh this out. Please site your sources that support your claim. Which protestant groups/denominations claim to believe what you have said here?
Jon
Thanks.CARM, but that’d be like using Jack Chick to speak for all Christians or Richard Dawkins to speak for all atheists
I offer a counterargument. Where in the Bible does it say these 66 books are to be read, but most certainly not Sirach, Baruch, Tobit, Wisdom, Judith, 1 Maccabees or 2 Maccabees? Many Protestants seem to think those 66 books always made up the Bible, then Catholics added 7 more. Here’s a more accurate version:
First 400 years– No uniform canon. Different regional churches have different regional canons
c. 400 AD– The first uniform canon is made. It consists of the 66 books Protestants know, plus Sirach, Baruch, Tobit, Wisdom, Judith, Maccabees, and a few more chapters in Esther and Daniel
c. 1500 AD– Luther starts the Reformation. He removes those 7 books partially because the original versions were Greek and not Hebrew. Notably, he still considered them worth reading, just not divinely inspired
Some time after the KJV– Protestants stop publishing the apocrypha/deuterocanon
Other facts:
*Hanukkah is from 1 Maccabees
*Ironically, some of those books found older Hebrew versions in the Dead Sea Scrolls
**YES… **This is probably the best answer here. Especially the last paragraph. I have been telling other believers for over 20 years that the moment we become angry with each other, and start to argue, rather than to discuss, we are sinning and we are out of the Lord’s Will for us. We must not fight and argue. Satan wants that, not Jesus.I’m a catholic who goes to Mass daily, some times more. I receive Jesus everyday if possible, to me the Liturgy of the Mass is Jesus greatest gift to us.
There are people in or church who do the same thing. Most say the Rosary or the Stations of the Cross before Mass.There are people in the Morning who recite the Hours, for me I love to meditate in the presents of my Lord. The reason I tell you this is all these ways of worshiping Jesus are correct, I find none superior to others. It is the same for protestants if the Bible fills you in the Love of Jesus who am I to say nay.If the Liturgy of the Mass fills my Soul with Jesus, no one has the right to judge me.
I think Jesus is more offended by our fighting and arguing than anything else, it only separates us. We all who believe and live as taught are in the church of Jesus Christ, and as the attacks on Christianity continues we need to remember this. This is a young mans argument that feeds the ego and not my Lord.
You are correct, most Protestants believe that the Catholic Church fell from Christianity and that it became pagan somewhere along time.classica87;10906472 said:7 Sorrows, I wish I could give you a more “factual” answer, but the best thing I can tell you is that many Protestants like to ignore history. That, or they will pretend the early Church was much more Protestant-like, and that at some point in history (usually around Constantine’s time) the Church became “infected” with Roman pagan influence and was no longer the true church Christ founded. Doesn’t really make sense to me, but a lot of Protestantism is illogical.
But if you look at the writings of the early church fathers, which is as the year 60, a lot of these guys are preaching, writing, and teaching what the Catholic Church teaches today. The Catholic Church has not changed, ppl say that it has to make themselves feel better.
I just LOVE this topic!!!I suppose it’s because the Bible makes some pretty explicit statements that make us feel there is no need for anything extra Biblical. John 3:16 is straight forward, there is no special context to it. God loved the world that He gave His only Son so that whoever believes in Him will not perish but have everlasting life.
So how does anyone obtain Salvation and not perish? Believing in His Son.