Why Do Protestants think They Know Everything There Is To Know About The Catholic Faith?

  • Thread starter Thread starter churchcamefirst
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You haven’t yet named anything false in all the time I have been here. I’m through discussing this with you because you have no substance and no basis.
OSAS=False doctrine.

Symbolism of Eucharist=False doctrine

Sola Scriptura=False Doctrine

Faith Alone=False doctrine

Rapture=False Doctrine.
 
OSAS=False doctrine.

Symbolism of Eucharist=False doctrine

Sola Scriptura=False Doctrine

Faith Alone=False doctrine

Rapture=False Doctrine.
again, not one single thing have you mentioned here that is doctrine of my church.
 
Catholics have Apostolic Succession and yours do not. You cannot even trace your Church to the Apostles.
Of course we trace our church to the apostles. Our origin is no different than yours other than your insistence on a pope.
 
Of course we trace our church to the apostles. Our origin is no different than yours other than your insistence on a pope.
Ask Manny why Paul never so much as mentioned Peter as being the Pope when he went to Rome. When Peter was persecuted and martyred in Rome, it was around the time Paul was there. Why in the world would Paul never once mention Peter as the Pope in Rome if in fact it was so?
 
Well, where is it written that Jesus renounced Judaism? He was born a Jew and He was even called Rabbi. When did He become a Catholic?
he didnt have to, he was. as a human, a physical human, he was jewish because his family was. he was the saviour. he was christ, hence christianity.
 
Cut and paste arguments are a bit of a bore Manny.
you wont listen to reason or provide anything more than a smart off comment when we try to explain with our own words.you dont debate you just decide you are right and add some smiley animations. why dont you take his argument seriously?
 
Ask Manny why Paul never so much as mentioned Peter as being the Pope when he went to Rome.
Peter’s letters shows that he was in Rome.
When Peter was persecuted and martyred in Rome, it was around the time Paul was there. Why in the world would Paul never once mention Peter as the Pope in Rome if in fact it was so?
Because the word Pope was not use until the later period. The word Pope was first used by the Alexandria Bishop who use it. It was later in the centuries that Pope was used to describe the Bishop of Rome.

The successor of St. Peter according to Patristic Sources, show that they are always referred to as Bishops of Rome. The Church of Rome is noted as Apostolic Sees. In the Early Church, there were Five Metropolitan Sees. Rome, Jerusalem, Alexandria, Constantinople, and Antioch. These Sees were founded by the Apostles.

Rome is founded by Peter and Paul, Jerusalem by James, Alexandria by Mark, Constantinople by Andrew, and Antioch by Peter.
 
you wont listen to reason or provide anything more than a smart off comment when we try to explain with our own words.you dont debate you just decide you are right and add some smiley animations. why dont you take his argument seriously?
I never add smiley animations. Cut and paste is a very dull way to argue. Let him argue with his own words.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top