A
AFerri48
Guest
How do you enforce a law if there is no punishment?
Because we recognize that many women who choose and seek abortions are facing incredibly difficult personal circumstances, and that the means to assist those people isn’t through punishment, but rather by offering a helping hand. It’s the same mentality that says that you don’t punish a starving child who steals just so they won’t starve.How do you enforce a law if there is no punishment?
We can legislate morality from the top-down, dust off our hands and call it good.Because we recognize that many women who choose and seek abortions are facing incredibly difficult personal circumstances, and that the means to assist those people isn’t through punishment, but rather by offering a helping hand. It’s the same mentality that says that you don’t punish a starving child who steals just so they won’t starve.
while I truly do not believe that criminalizing abortion would help the pro-life movement, it is possible to have a law against abortion and not punish women; you punish the people providing the abortions. If there is a disincentive to perform the procedure, the rates drop off.
But again, criminalization is not the answer. The answer lies in changing society’s mindset to stop pathologizing pregnancy, to not devalue life merely because it is unborn, and to place greater emphasis on supporting women with unplanned pregnancies to let them make the best choices for them AND their child.
I think that women who willfully get an abortion SHOULD be punished; if they are allowed to go free then we dishonor the victim of her murder, and we send the message that we don’t really consider the child to be a living thing.How do you enforce a law if there is no punishment?
Interesting example.I think there’s a rough parallel to prostitution, where pimps are bad actors all of the time but prostitutes are often victims (especially underage girls forced into sex trafficking). The criminal justice system has been increasingly recognizing this in recent years and treating them as victims rather than offenders.
Easy. Close clinics. Seek censure of doctors that perform them. There are other ways, civil ways of enforcing a law without criminal punishment. I know Americans, (and Kim Jong Un) don’t want to hear this, but locking people up by the millions is not the only way to run a country.How do you enforce a law if there is no punishment?
Most of those people are in prison for nonviolent drug offenses (because of the War on Drugs) or are kept in prison long after their debt to society has been paid off (because of Mandatory Minimums and a political system that encourages politicians to be “tough on crime” while punishing politicians who try to encourage rehabilitation).Easy. Close clinics. Seek censure of doctors that perform them. There are other ways, civil ways of enforcing a law without criminal punishment. I know Americans, (and Kim Jong Un) don’t want to hear this, but locking people up by the millions is not the only way to run a country.
For me to believe this, I would need to see some correlation between women who have had an abortion and other crime that justifies the statement, “too dangerous to be left on the outside.”However, someone who commits a heinous crime (such as, say, murdering one’s own child) deserves to be in prison and is too dangerous to be left on the outside.
This is so well said. I know three persons who had an abortion in high school and college:Because we recognize that many women who choose and seek abortions are facing incredibly difficult personal circumstances, and that the means to assist those people isn’t through punishment, but rather by offering a helping hand. It’s the same mentality that says that you don’t punish a starving child who steals just so they won’t starve.
while I truly do not believe that criminalizing abortion would help the pro-life movement, it is possible to have a law against abortion and not punish women; you punish the people providing the abortions. If there is a disincentive to perform the procedure, the rates drop off.
But again, criminalization is not the answer. The answer lies in changing society’s mindset to stop pathologizing pregnancy, to not devalue life merely because it is unborn, and to place greater emphasis on supporting women with unplanned pregnancies to let them make the best choices for them AND their child.
What punishment do you feel would be appropriate for women who willingly get an abortion?I think that women who willfully get an abortion SHOULD be punished; if they are allowed to go free then we dishonor the victim of her murder, and we send the message that we don’t really consider the child to be a living thing.
As for why many don’t want women to go to jail for child-murder, there could be a number of reasons. It could be cynicism (they don’t really believe that unborn babies are worth protecting, or that abortion is murder, and just hate the idea of sex not resulting in burdensome responsibility), it could be pessimism (they’ve given up on making abortion illegal, and have lowered their long term goals), it could be reflexive (pro-abortion people often unfairly accuse anti-abortion people of being “anti-choice” or “anti-woman” or “woman-haters” so some anti-abortion people don’t want to give their opposition the chance to make such accusations), or it could be something else.
But if abortion is murder, than there is no good reason to let an accomplice to murder go free. It would be like pardoning Amelia Dyre.
What about all the people around the mother who force her into that situation? It’s women who have to deal with unplanned pregnancies, but I can promise you there was a man involved in getting her in that state. Does he get tried? If he knew she was pregnant and refused to support her, forcing her to feel abortion was her only choice, is he an accomplice? Or perhaps a co-conspirator? If her parents threatened to disown her or throw her out if she ever got pregnant, are they to be held liable?Most of those people are in prison for nonviolent drug offenses (because of the War on Drugs) or are kept in prison long after their debt to society has been paid off (because of Mandatory Minimums and a political system that encourages politicians to be “tough on crime” while punishing politicians who try to encourage rehabilitation).
However, someone who commits a heinous crime (such as, say, murdering one’s own child) deserves to be in prison and is too dangerous to be left on the outside. It there’s no room in the prison for the child-killer, than make room by transferring the heroin addict to a facility geared towards curing addictions.
What punishment do you suggest? Incarceration or the death penalty? It is after murder in the first which qualifies for the death penalty.How do you enforce a law if there is no punishment?
The same punishment you would expect for anyone else who murders their child. A long imprisonment and the label of “murder” on their criminal record after/if they ever get released.What punishment do you feel would be appropriate for women who willingly get an abortion?
Abortion is murder. If a woman pays someone to kill her 6 year old child then NOBODY would be arguing that “Oh she needs support, not punishment!” or “Punish the guy she hired but let her go free!”.For me to believe this, I would need to see some correlation between women who have had an abortion and other crime that justifies the statement, “too dangerous to be left on the outside.”
If there is ever any chance of making abortion illegal, harsh punishment will poison the well and end that chance.