Why do so many protestants not consider church attendance an important part of their faith?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MooCowSteph
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MooCowSteph

Guest
it seems more and more are becoming “unchurchers” if you will - believing that regular church attendance might even be harmful. They want to do a home church. Believing quite literally that where three gather, there goes the Lord. I’m not even sure how to approach those beliefs; they certainly don’t seem in line with the Bible.
 
Sigh. I know what you mean. And there’s no reasoning with such people; they only leave that fad when they get burned by it. 😦

Most of the Protestants that I know who are drawn to such things say that 1) Jesus didn’t found an institution, 2) There’s no such thing as clergy or priests/pastors because “Jesus taught the priesthood of all believers” and 3) The real Church is supposed to meet in homes. They hold to these beliefs as though their lives depended on them. They then spin these wild yarns about Constantine and Nicaea, and finally conclude that all “organized religion” is false, manmade, and heretical. It’s how cults are formed, frankly…but in our increasingly feel-good & me-centered culture, people would rather believe a lie sometimes. :mad:

Sorry…I’ve seen a lot of friends go off the deep end with this stuff lately, and they all give the same reasons why. It’s so postmodern that they refuse to even be reasonable; your interpretations are fine, but they don’t have to listen to them or accept them. We must pray for guidance with such people, because this movement is more about rejecting authority than anything else. And if 2 or 3 gather to pray, Christ certainly is there; but if a handful of postmodernists gather to misinterpret the Bible and reject the Lord’s Church, his ordained teachers, his sacraments, and the fellowship of the Faithful in real churches…how do they know that Christ is “with them?”
 
it seems more and more are becoming “unchurchers” if you will - believing that regular church attendance might even be harmful. They want to do a home church. Believing quite literally that where three gather, there goes the Lord. I’m not even sure how to approach those beliefs; they certainly don’t seem in line with the Bible.
Amongst Evangelicals, I’ve encountered Acts 2:42–47 (with much emphasis on verse 46b) being adduced in order to endorse this notion. I’ve no doubt that in such company you’d find people who would assert that the idea is “biblical.”

Cordially,
Mick
👍
 
It’s so postmodern that they refuse to even be reasonable; your interpretations are fine, but they don’t have to listen to them or accept them. We must pray for guidance with such people, because this movement is more about rejecting authority than anything else. And if 2 or 3 gather to pray, Christ certainly is there; but if a handful of postmodernists gather to misinterpret the Bible and reject the Lord’s Church, his ordained teachers, his sacraments, and the fellowship of the Faithful in real churches…how do they know that Christ is “with them?”
Just what IS postmodernism? The word is always popping up. As far as I can work it out it just means ‘something I don’t go along with’. :confused:
 
I go, but I also don’t feel I’ve committed any great sin by not going. Also keep in mind many protestant churches have one, and only one, service per week. Baseball practices, soccer games, work, school events, etc. can all impact one’s ability to go to church if 11 a.m. Sunday is the only opportunity. But definitely, I would like to see attendance higher.

At the same time, I’ve met a few people who will spend an hour or more in prayer and meditation per week but never go to church and that seems to really work for them, that is when they feel close to God and they are certainly worshipping in their way and I find no fault with them.These are not home church people, these are people who like NO ONE around them when they worship as they find it a distraction.
 
One might just as easily ask the same question of the Catholic church. In Australia, weekly attendance by Catholics is about 15% of adherents, similar to the other “old” Christian churches. The Christian variants with the greatest attendance are the Pentecostal churches, although “church loyalty” among Pentecostals is the lowest.
Just saying, is all.
As noted in a post above, the demands of life just get in the way, no matter the denomination.
 
Just what IS postmodernism? The word is always popping up. As far as I can work it out it just means ‘something I don’t go along with’. :confused:
That is a very good question. It is nebulous enough that one definition might not look like another; but at least I can explain how I use it (and how my seminary/ministry friends use it). It is basically a reaction to the Modernist/Enlightenment approach to life. It grew out of the destruction of the early 20th Century, and it is best personified in the general sarcastic disdain for all establishment that we see today among the post-WWII generations. Modernists believed that everything must be proven, demonstrated, tangible; there was a disdain for the spiritual in favor of the physical. Progress was emphasized over tradition; industry was emphasized over the natural, etc. Postmodernism, as a reaction, believes that very little can be proven. The old & traditional may be bad, but the new is just as bad. It’s a very cynical outlook that ultimately is a rejection of authority and of anything that claims authority. A Modernist might reject transubstantiation because he can’t “prove” it; a Postmodernist rejects it because “what makes this so-called priest any different than the rest of us?” A Modernist opposes “organized religion” because it stands in the way of “Progress,” while a Postmodernist opposes it because it’s just a bunch of groupthink and people who can’t find their own meaning in life.

I don’t know if I’ve helped or made it worse, but that’s at least a starting point!
 
But as far as the question of the OP, I spoke mainly of the weird “house church” phenomenon that is spreading thanks to people like George Barna. As far as just average Protestant church attendance on Sundays, that’s another matter entirely. 😃 But the folks that Steph mentioned who are dropping out of church to get into this trendy house church movement - these are people who tend to not value (or not believe in) the benefits of corporate worship. I fear that too many Protestant churches are all about the sermon or the music, and therefore seem “skippable.” Sermons are online; music is on the radio.

Churches need to learn and teach a theology of worship that is less about “me and my personal preferences” and more about the One who is the only reason for our Sunday gatherings.
 
it seems more and more are becoming “unchurchers” if you will - believing that regular church attendance might even be harmful. They want to do a home church. Believing quite literally that where three gather, there goes the Lord. I’m not even sure how to approach those beliefs; they certainly don’t seem in line with the Bible.
As a former Protestant the issue is that since they are young they are taught Sola Scriptura. That being said the Church becomes a social club and during times of frugality clubs are not needed so they retreat to their houses… My thinking anyway.

God bless you…and please pray for me…
 
Wow, you pretty much summed up the argument I heard from a woman today. It’s like you were there 😉
Sigh. I know what you mean. And there’s no reasoning with such people; they only leave that fad when they get burned by it. 😦

Most of the Protestants that I know who are drawn to such things say that 1) Jesus didn’t found an institution, 2) There’s no such thing as clergy or priests/pastors because “Jesus taught the priesthood of all believers” and 3) The real Church is supposed to meet in homes. They hold to these beliefs as though their lives depended on them. They then spin these wild yarns about Constantine and Nicaea, and finally conclude that all “organized religion” is false, manmade, and heretical. It’s how cults are formed, frankly…but in our increasingly feel-good & me-centered culture, people would rather believe a lie sometimes. :mad:

Sorry…I’ve seen a lot of friends go off the deep end with this stuff lately, and they all give the same reasons why. It’s so postmodern that they refuse to even be reasonable; your interpretations are fine, but they don’t have to listen to them or accept them. We must pray for guidance with such people, because this movement is more about rejecting authority than anything else. And if 2 or 3 gather to pray, Christ certainly is there; but if a handful of postmodernists gather to misinterpret the Bible and reject the Lord’s Church, his ordained teachers, his sacraments, and the fellowship of the Faithful in real churches…how do they know that Christ is “with them?”
 
That is a very good question. It is nebulous enough that one definition might not look like another; but at least I can explain how I use it (and how my seminary/ministry friends use it). It is basically a reaction to the Modernist/Enlightenment approach to life. It grew out of the destruction of the early 20th Century, and it is best personified in the general sarcastic disdain for all establishment that we see today among the post-WWII generations. Modernists believed that everything must be proven, demonstrated, tangible; there was a disdain for the spiritual in favor of the physical. Progress was emphasized over tradition; industry was emphasized over the natural, etc. Postmodernism, as a reaction, believes that very little can be proven. The old & traditional may be bad, but the new is just as bad. It’s a very cynical outlook that ultimately is a rejection of authority and of anything that claims authority. A Modernist might reject transubstantiation because he can’t “prove” it; a Postmodernist rejects it because “what makes this so-called priest any different than the rest of us?” A Modernist opposes “organized religion” because it stands in the way of “Progress,” while a Postmodernist opposes it because it’s just a bunch of groupthink and people who can’t find their own meaning in life.

I don’t know if I’ve helped or made it worse, but that’s at least a starting point!
Thanks - now at last I have an idea of what it’s all about!👍
 
Sigh. I know what you mean. And there’s no reasoning with such people; they only leave that fad when they get burned by it. 😦
Reminds me of a funny church sign I saw once. “Why change churches? Does it really matter which church you stay home from?” LOL
 
it seems more and more are becoming “unchurchers” if you will - believing that regular church attendance might even be harmful. They want to do a home church. Believing quite literally that where three gather, there goes the Lord. I’m not even sure how to approach those beliefs; they certainly don’t seem in line with the Bible.
Now I believe church is very important. But on the other hand a church is not a building or a building with a altar and fancy art. A church can be anyplace, in your home, outside, in a barn, I’ve even seen a priest hold services form the tailgate of a truck. Church is where ever you choose to worship God. I don’t think God is impressed or even cares that you choose to worship in a big fancy church. When Jesus had the sermon on the mount, was it in a church [building] or was it out in the open? I do church services in a nursing home dining room. Does that make it any less then a fancy place? Do the people that come to the services not get the same kind of worship that they would get if they went of a fancy church.Are they not worshiping and honoring God in that dining room? Isn’t the main idea behind church to worship God, to praise and honor God. Isn’t God always with us as long as we believe in him and accept him? Where does it say in the Bible that you must go to a fancy church [building] to worship him?
 
Now I believe church is very important. But on the other hand a church is not a building or a building with a altar and fancy art. A church can be anyplace, in your home, outside, in a barn, I’ve even seen a priest hold services form the tailgate of a truck. Church is where ever you choose to worship God. I don’t think God is impressed or even cares that you choose to worship in a big fancy church. When Jesus had the sermon on the mount, was it in a church [building] or was it out in the open? I do church services in a nursing home dining room. Does that make it any less then a fancy place? Do the people that come to the services not get the same kind of worship that they would get if they went of a fancy church.Are they not worshiping and honoring God in that dining room? Isn’t the main idea behind church to worship God, to praise and honor God. Isn’t God always with us as long as we believe in him and accept him? Where does it say in the Bible that you must go to a fancy church [building] to worship him?
I think what it all really boils down to is really the primary difference between Catholics and Protestants - the Eucharist. We attend Mass every week to receive Jesus. He is the center of our worship. But in protestant Churches, it COULD just as easily be held in the basement, the home, or wherever. Of course a Catholic Mass could be held anywhere, too. But when it is, Jesus is still truly present.
 
I think what it all really boils down to is really the primary difference between Catholics and Protestants - the Eucharist. We attend Mass every week to receive Jesus. He is the center of our worship. But in protestant Churches, it COULD just as easily be held in the basement, the home, or wherever. Of course a Catholic Mass could be held anywhere, too. But when it is, Jesus is still truly present.
I think you’re right. There’s a very different reason for being there if you attend a sacramental church.
 
Now I believe church is very important. But on the other hand a church is not a building or a building with a altar and fancy art. A church can be anyplace, in your home, outside, in a barn, I’ve even seen a priest hold services form the tailgate of a truck. Church is where ever you choose to worship God. I don’t think God is impressed or even cares that you choose to worship in a big fancy church. When Jesus had the sermon on the mount, was it in a church [building] or was it out in the open? I do church services in a nursing home dining room. Does that make it any less then a fancy place? Do the people that come to the services not get the same kind of worship that they would get if they went of a fancy church.Are they not worshiping and honoring God in that dining room? Isn’t the main idea behind church to worship God, to praise and honor God. Isn’t God always with us as long as we believe in him and accept him? Where does it say in the Bible that you must go to a fancy church [building] to worship him?
This mentality is exactly what we are talking about. Since you ask, I assume that you were expecting a different answer, because, no, it is not just a house of worship, nor is that it’s primary purpose. It is a dwelling place, a sacrificing altar, a temple, and to understand a church’s role, you must understand the role of the Temple of Jerusalem.

It’s all about the Eucharist. Christians who believe in True Presence have a desire be in communion with Our Lord on a regular basis, and recongnize when the need to return for more. Churches with a liturgical tradition are able to maintain this, because they remember that a convenant with God always has an outward sign. Prayer and worship acompany The Sacrifice. They cannot replace it, and if “home worshippers” really believed in the laying of hands as told in the Acts and Paul’s Letters (which is not the same thing as baptism), then they would never attempt to do this on their own. As for the “fancy” church, the House of The Lord must always be the most grand of all within a community, because Christ is King, and our sacrifices to Him must be from among our best, not simply from what we think we can spare. That’s not to say a Mass can’t happen elsewhere, but that should be the exception to be used only if necessary, not the norm.
 
I don’t understand it myself. One of those “mega” churches or McChurches as some people around my area have taken to calling them, cancelled their Easter morning services because they wanted their congregation to spend the day with their families.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top