Why do some non-cathloics not have Baptism for infants

  • Thread starter Thread starter BILL_PICK53
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that is a silly argument. Jesus Christ says, “Let the little children come to me”. There is no way I can possibly see that Jesus would exclude infants from the glorious sacrament of baptism–because they cannot speak!!! The infants are so pure that they can see the angels. We baptize them as soon as possible for the remission of original sin. As rinnie says, the parents and Godparents then teach them so that they may grow and prosper as devout Christians.

No. We make the decision for our infants. Scripture is mainly talking to adult converts to the faith. When these converts repented and were baptized, they also baptized their entire household–this would include infants. The early Church also corroborates the baptism of infants. I believe the earliest example is St Polycarp.
“Let the little children come to me” does not mean, for baptism. Using this scripture for this purpose is clearly taking it out of context (its not dealing with baptism). Look through scriptures that deal with baptism and notice that they all present adults being baptized. There is no infant baptism in scripture. There isn’t even any discussion of it in scripture. I have never heard that Baptizing one’s “household” included infants. If the emphasis was on personal choice, it likely would not have included infants.

Scripture does point to the idea that many who claim to be believers will not be in Heaven. Many will call out to God and ask for Him to accept them and He will not. Those people also likely were baptized and went through the traditions of the church… I think one thing that can be drawn from this fact is that it is not baptism that saves. It is not a binding contract that forces God to open the door for us into heaven.

Even if the church (polycarp) has historically baptized children, we have not always been the people God wanted us to be - we have made mistakes. Maybe infant baptism is one of those mistakes.

I am not saying that God will reject anyone who has practiced infant baptism… I am not saying that because we disagree you are damned. I do my best to have integrity with what I am learning in scripture and I have learned that God is the judge - I am not - He will decide who is in and who is not. You and I are not equipped or given the authority to make such judgments of other people.
 
Baptism should be a given in Christian families just as teaching the family language is a given. If your mother waited for you to decide for yourself to speak the language of your parents, where would that leave you as a child not learning the language? It’s a given because your parents speak to you and you learn as they speak. Well the same with the faith. If the parents are living the Christian faith it is almost automatically taught to the children. It just has to further be encouraged by the parents as the child grows. The next obvious step is Confirmation.
Love for God is a choice. We surrender to Him by choice. Even to learn a language, it is a choice. I think it is interesting that you use the metaphor of language to stand for faith in God. Language is something that we learn to help us relate to each other - I can become very adept at the language of faith, yet have no commitment myself. I grew up in a very Catholic neighborhood - many of the Catholics I knew were not committed to living the way of Jesus - they were at least as corrupt as the non-Catholics in the neighborhood, if not more so. When they entered into the church they knew the language of faith, but out in the parking lot they couldn’t wait to get away as they honked their horns and gave each other the finger. I know many Catholics who are sincere, but many who are not. Does the Confirmation system encourage sincerity among Catholics or discourage it? If a person feels that they don’t have a choice are they more or less likely to pursue the challenge put in front of them? If decisions were made for them before they knew what was happening, are they more likely to revolt? I don’t have the answers, but I wonder. Just because I sound like a good Catholic doesn’t mean I am a good Catholic. Saying the right words isn’t enough, we have to mean them.
That is why I’m so grateful to be part of God’s Church, the Catholic Church. Because the Church knows the faith inside & out. I don’t have to figure anything out for myself. I just have to look to the Church for answers and there they are!
A Catholic friend of mine visited Vatican City a few years ago. In standing within its walls she was keenly aware that this was not a place that Jesus would want to stay. Jesus would likely not be on the side of this regime. She was over whelmed by the wealth, luxury and greed. Since talking to her I have met others who feel the same way. The Catholic church is an organization run by people, many of whom are seeking God, but as is always the case, many of whom are not interested in what God wants.

You said, “I don’t have to figure anything out for myself.” From my perspective, this must mean you are disengaged in your relationship with God. The church is not supposed to tell you what to believe. I believe that Jesus would say you have taken the lazy way out. God wants you to be in a relationship with Him, not eavesdropping on what He is saying to other people and using it for your own benefit.

I am not a perfect man and my perspective is limited. I can only see so much and it isn’t always clear - I’ve tried to say what I see. Please understand that I am not claiming to have divine authority/vision of who you are and what God thinks. I am just saying what I see and I may not be right because I am not God.
 
PART ONE
Love for God is a choice. We surrender to Him by choice.
Correct. And no one said that baptism forces a choice on someone to choose God. This is why you can still lose your salvation. Because even though you have been baptised you can still turn away from God.
Even to learn a language, it is a choice. I think it is interesting that you use the metaphor of language to stand for faith in God. Language is something that we learn to help us relate to each other
Same with religion.
  • I can become very adept at the language of faith, yet have no commitment myself. I grew up in a very Catholic neighborhood - many of the Catholics I knew were not committed to living the way of Jesus - they were at least as corrupt as the non-Catholics in the neighborhood, if not more so.
Same with Protestants. Please, it’s not just Catholics, or it is not people because they are Catholics. Don’t forget free will.
When they entered into the church they knew the language of faith, but out in the parking lot they couldn’t wait to get away as they honked their horns and gave each other the finger. I know many Catholics who are sincere, but many who are not.
And I know the same of Protestants. The first one that comes to mind is George W. Bush Jr. Our last president. I find him to be a vile evil man. And he’s not Catholic.

Secondly, I don’t know where you live, but I know MANY Protestants who are racists and bigots. Just as there are Catholics. Would you like me to paint you in the same way as those “God fearing ‘saved’” Protestants I see?
Does the Confirmation system encourage sincerity among Catholics or discourage it?
What kind of question is that? If I were to ask you, “Does you accepting Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour encourage or discourage sincerity in you as a Christian?” Of course you’re going to say yes. This is a bogus question and shows ignorance on your part about Confirmation.

Confirmation is a sacrament. Here is confirmation from the Cathechism of the Catholic Church. Now, whether you agree with this is another thing, but this is what Confirmation is.

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a2.htm
 
PART TWO
If a person feels that they don’t have a choice are they more or less likely to pursue the challenge put in front of them?
That depends on the individual person. If you’re implying that because a person was baptised as a baby they have no choice so they don’t have to pursue Christ, that is wrong.

I have seen “born again Christians,” or those who have been baptized at their church then go off and think they can do whatever it is they please because they are saved. Who cares? They’re saved.
If decisions were made for them before they knew what was happening, are they more likely to revolt?
I would not say they were more likely to revolt. This is under the assumption that having something forced on someone is going to ensure that person will revolt. That’s not the case and is a loaded question.

There are MANY Catholics who had baptism “forced” on them and then went on to CHOOSE to stay Catholic, continue to grow in their faith and continue to seek God. I have MANY people like that in my family. I was not one of them. I rebelled, not revolted, at the Catholic church. Only later to see just how beautiful and right it is.

Secondly, many protestants clearly don’t understand Catholic marriages and promises. As Catholics, when we marry, we make a PROMISE to rear our children in the Catholic faith. And that includes baptising our children - and baptising them as babies. This is in keeping with that PROMISE.

Would you have us break our word, our PROMISE to God? Clearly you do.

Further, you point to the actions of a few Catholics as “baby baptism doesn’t work” when I can point to many Protestants who are “once saved always saved” to show that OSAS does not work by their words (which is also and indication of their thoughts) and deeds.
I don’t have the answers, but I wonder. Just because I sound like a good Catholic doesn’t mean I am a good Catholic. Saying the right words isn’t enough, we have to mean them.
Correct. And again this is a misconception that many Protestants have about Catholics. You THINK that because someone is Catholic they’re merely saying words. From MY point of view, Protestants don’t mean their “once saved always saved” words. Because I see many that simply go off and do as they please because, well, what does it matter? They’re SAVED! And because they “chose” to be SAVED! as adults, well, then that makes anything they do alright,right?
 
PART THREE
A Catholic friend of mine visited Vatican City a few years ago. In standing within its walls she was keenly aware that this was not a place that Jesus would want to stay.
And while I may not have met your friend, nor gone to Vatican City, I would have to say that she was viewing things wrong. Of course you’re going to point out one data point, your friend, to show your case. Big deal. That was one person. There are many other people who have been and have felt his presence. Frankly, I would more likely presume that your friend simply just does not feel Jesus’ presence.

Incidentally, I have been inside several Protestant churches. I felt no presence of God there. None. Period. But I have always felt His presence in any Catholic church I have been in.

So what’s your point about your friend? She’s not an authoritative figure.
Jesus would likely not be on the side of this regime.
I find it amusing and laughable that you would presume to know what Jesus would be on the side of.
She was over whelmed by the wealth, luxury and greed.
And if Protestants are oh so humble with their plain churches, I ask them to put their money where there mouth is. Or rather, get rid of all of their money. “Greed” is a perception. Just because she is Catholic doesn’t make her some authority on the wealth, luxury and greed she perceived.
Since talking to her I have met others who feel the same way. The Catholic church is an organization run by people, many of whom are seeking God, but as is always the case, many of whom are not interested in what God wants.
And you think Protestants have cornered the market that? I drive by two MEGA churches on my way to work. MEGA. There are a TON of those here in Dallas. I have yet to see a Catholic church that is so … business like that I see of the Protestant churches here. The immense wealth they display, large facilities that look, quite frankly, rather secular.
You said, “I don’t have to figure anything out for myself.” From my perspective, this must mean you are disengaged in your relationship with God. The church is not supposed to tell you what to believe. I believe that Jesus would say you have taken the lazy way out. God wants you to be in a relationship with Him, not eavesdropping on what He is saying to other people and using it for your own benefit.
That’s your perspective. She’s not disengaged any more than you are. You think that because you can read scripture, pick and chose various passages to prove your point about what you believe, that you’re a grand theologian and can profess to know what Jesus would want.

If you go to church on Sunday and listen to your preacher preach about the Gospel, then I call you a hypocrite for making such a statement.

Everything that is done in the Catholic church is to bring the Christian closer to God, be in communion with Jesus Christ.

I wonder what Jesus would have said or done had you been around in His time, taken His word, then went off and preached about YOUR interpretation of His word. I truly do wonder that.
I am not a perfect man and my perspective is limited. I can only see so much and it isn’t always clear - I’ve tried to say what I see.
Oh… my. Did you just admit infallibility?!? GASP :rolleyes:

So clearly we can’t really take much of what you just said seriously. And by the way, you didn’t even really need to say this. Reading your post we can definitely see your perspective is SEVERELY limited.
Please understand that I am not claiming to have divine authority/vision of who you are and what God thinks. I am just saying what I see and I may not be right because I am not God.
So. I’m going to go into Morpheus mode from “The Matrix” - because I love that movie. 😃

Consider the possibility that what you see is not what you think it is. You presented annecdotal “evidence” to prove your case. Yet you refuse to see the other evidence. i.e. Those Catholics you see in the parking lot flipping other people off? Did you happen to turn your head towards the Catholic church and see the many OTHER Catholics who are helping other people? Taking time out of their day to do good works out of their love of Jesus Christ? Volunteering to help the poor, feed and clothe the needy, help pregnant teens get through life? You probably didn’t because you were so focused on trying to find evidence to prove to yourself that Catholics were fakes and liars.
 
PART ONE
Same with Protestants. Please, it’s not just Catholics, or it is not people because they are Catholics. Don’t forget free will. And I know the same of Protestants. The first one that comes to mind is George W. Bush Jr. Our last president. I find him to be a vile evil man. And he’s not Catholic. Secondly, I don’t know where you live, but I know MANY Protestants who are racists and bigots. Just as there are Catholics. Would you like me to paint you in the same way as those “God fearing ‘saved’” Protestants I see?
Clearly you are upset by the questions I’ve offered. Please don’t feel the need to go down this road. Questions are just questions - they aren’t daggers or bombs - they aren’t dangerous, so we don’t need to get upset about them or behave out of offense.

Your response above doesn’t directly answer my question. All it does is turn the mirror on some other people. Your defense is that Protestants are just as fickle as Catholics (some not all). That doesn’t make it right.
What kind of question is that? If I were to ask you, “Does you accepting Jesus Christ as your lord and saviour encourage or discourage sincerity in you as a Christian?” Of course you’re going to say yes. This is a bogus question and shows ignorance on your part about Confirmation.

Confirmation is a sacrament. Here is confirmation from the Cathechism of the Catholic Church. Now, whether you agree with this is another thing, but this is what Confirmation is.

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c1a2.htm
I’m just asking questions. I’m not making accusations. I do wonder if being born into the Catholic church makes some people feel a little manipulated. They’ve been christened without their consent and then the time comes for them to receive confirmation and everyone they went to school with is doing it and their entire family expects them to do it. It seems a little forced… some people might go through the motions just to get the rest of us off of their backs.

Personally, I don’t think it is right for me or my family. I think desire to be baptized should be spontaneous, from the mind of a person who has been able to comprehend what they are committing to.

(Again, this said, I do not hold condemnation over those who disagree with me).
Have a great day!
SW
 
A child who wants to be saved and baptized, and understands the gospel of Christ, regardless how young, would in fact be baptized in many what Catholics call “protestant” churches…
Can a two week old be Baptized in your church.
 
Clearly you are upset by the questions I’ve offered. Please don’t feel the need to go down this road. Questions are just questions - they aren’t daggers or bombs - they aren’t dangerous, so we don’t need to get upset about them or behave out of offense.

Your response above doesn’t directly answer my question. All it does is turn the mirror on some other people. Your defense is that Protestants are just as fickle as Catholics (some not all). That doesn’t make it right.
My point is this: the question is not answerable. You’re trying to paint Catholics in a particular light because of some of the few Catholics that you’ve seen. I am not deflecting, I am showing that what you think of Catholics can be the same of Protestants.

You just didn’t like my answer.
I’m just asking questions. I’m not making accusations. I do wonder if being born into the Catholic church makes some people feel a little manipulated. They’ve been christened without their consent and then the time comes for them to receive confirmation and everyone they went to school with is doing it and their entire family expects them to do it. It seems a little forced… some people might go through the motions just to get the rest of us off of their backs.
I don’t disagree with this. And yes, this does happen. So? Consider that much of what happens with Protestants is the same. I see Protestants who grew up Protestant, were never Catholic, having the same manipulation (although the detail is different) being put upon them. Especially when I hear some Protestants make claims about Catholicism that was preached to them from their church. Yet they don’t take the time to actually learn what Catholicism is all about.

There will always be this subset of people in any group. Catholics and Protestants alike.

You bring up confirmation. This is why confirmation is important. I take it also you didn’t read that link to the CCC from the Vatican that tells what Confirmation is and why it is important.

Confirmation is confirming one’s baptismal vows. It helps complete the cycle.

Here’s the ideal situation:
A couple gets married and they promise to God that any children they have will be reared in the Catholic faith.

When and if that couple has children, in keeping with that promise, and because of our beliefs, they have the child baptised. They choose Godparents who, upon accepting the role of Godparent, promise and commit to helping rear that child in the Catholic faith.

As the child grows up, both couples - the parents of the child and the Godparents - have (hopefully) properly cathechised the child in the faith. Teaching them about Jesus Christ and Catholicism.

The child then makes 1st communion. Yet another sacrament. In the Latin Rite (Roman Catholic) they do this at what is considered the “age of reason.” Around 7 years old. By that time the child should (again, hopefully) understand what is right and wrong. (I won’t get into Confession here, that’s another discussion.)

The child will then have more cathechesis in the faith and by the time they are a teen ager, it is thought that they will have been well formed and so they can then CHOOSE to confirm their baptismal vows with the the Sacrament of Confirmation.

The child then grows up and goes on to continue in their faith in the Catholic church. They then get married (if they so choose) and if they have children, repeat the cycle above.

IMO, I think this is why Protestants don’t understand when a Catholic will baptise their baby. It’s not just forcing something on another person. Because when that person grows up, nothing can be forced on that person. They can still lose their salvation by saying “No.” to God through their own free will. The Catholic is also keeping a PROMISE MADE TO GOD that they will rear any children in the Catholic faith.

It’s all interconnected yet different sacraments to help the Catholic continue in their faith and journey. Again, to repeat what I’ve said previously. Everything that is done in the Catholic church is to bring the Christian into communion with Jesus Christ. Our saviour.
Personally, I don’t think it is right for me or my family. I think desire to be baptized should be spontaneous, from the mind of a person who has been able to comprehend what they are committing to.
And this is where confirmation comes in.

BTW, I was never forced to confirm. As a teen ager I could not confirm. Not because I was banned from it. Not because someone else said I couldn’t. I assure you, for YEARS I heard it from my mother. She was so angry at me for not confirming. But I respected my faith enough to not lie and simply “go through the motions.” Now, at 40, I confirmed. I renewed my baptismal vows as a conscious human being, with FREE WILL and I FREELY CHOSE.

Of course there are people who do that and simply go through the motions. But when you take a look at how they live their life, you can see they clearly did not mean it. The same can be said of a “saved” Protestant. Take a look at their life. Are they living up to that being saved? (rhetorical question.)

What I ultimately asked of you was to not look at those people, but to look at the rest of the Christian body of Catholics who DO live up to their confirmation of their baptismal vows.

You guys just do it once. We have to do it as adults and then continue to do it every single day.
(Again, this said, I do not hold condemnation over those who disagree with me).
Have a great day!
SW
If I came off strong it is because I get frustrated when people insist that Catholics are one way when we’re not. And yet try to paint themselves and their group in a “better” light. Especially when what the person says shows clear ignorance about Catholicism and it’s practices.
 
I’m not so sure that he is french kissing heresy if he is simply restating what the Bible itself states. II Corinthians 5:21 says, “For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” How do you Catholics re-interpret this passage, since it says that Christ, who knew no sin himself, was made sin for us? He then took the full penalty for that sin, which was dead, or in other words, separation from God. Christ himself cried out, “My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?” Christ really did know why he had been forsaken by God the Father. He had been forsaken because he was bearing our sins, and he had willingly put Himself in that position of sin-bearer. I Peter 2:24 says, “who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness—by whose stripes you were healed.” So if there is any purity being thrown in the mud by the outhouse, it is Christ himself putting his own purity there so that He would be punished instead of us. At the moment Christ died, sin actually had won, since it was the resurrection of Christ that showed Christ’s victory over sin. I Corinthians 15:17 says, “And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins!”
Hello Bookworm,

Ok so lets see what 2 Cor 5:21 says. It says via RSV-CE:
“For our sake he made him to be sin, so that in him we might become the righteousness of of God.*”

So we then check out the note in the appendix for further clarification:
"*made him to be sine:*i.e., “sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh.” (Rom 8.3).

So lets then look at Roman 8.3 says:

“For God has done what the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: sending his own son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh,” 8.4

The implication that what Paul is doing is restating what he says in Romans 8.3. Not that Jesus is literally becoming sin, but that he became man in the incarnation to die for our sins. And that only Jesus was capable of this sacrifice. I.E. Jesus’ death now makes available to the faithful the possibility of becoming righteous.

You also bring up “My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?” as if Jesus was doubting his mission and believed that the Father had forsaken him. Nothing could be further from the truth. Let’s look to Pslam 22:

“My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me? Why are thou so far from helping me, from the words of my groaning?” Does this wound familiar? It should. This is exactly what Jesus himself was quoting. Why? Well lets look at Psalm 22 ends. “All the ends of the of the earth shall remember and turn to the Lord; and all the families of the nations shall worship before him. For dominion belongs to the Lord, and he rules over the nations. Yea, to him shall all the proud of the earth bow down; before him shall bow all who go down to the dust, and he cannot keep himself alive. Posterity shall serve him; men shall tell of the Lord to the coming generation, and proclaim his deliverance to a people yet unborn, that he has wrought it.”

What does this tell us? That Jesus was praying the psalm. That he was also fulfilling one of the greatest biblical prophesies. Not that he was forsaken by the Father. That is a misunderstanding at best and taking it out of the quotes original context. It is a prayer of hope and validation in Christ. Not a “moment of doubt and shame” as the Rolling Stones believed.

Your ending is a lot closer to the Truth with one fatal mistake. The death of Christ was not a case where “sin actually won”. This is the exact opposite. The moment where sin was defeated for eternity by Christ and Satan was thwarted. The resurrection of our Lord is the moment in which the realization of these events occurred. They confirm that God has already won, yet the moment of victory is when Christ died.

Go ahead in read Psalm 22. It’s a moving experience when one truly knows what Jesus was actually is saying.

Peace,
RedSoxWife**
 
PART THREE

And while I may not have met your friend, nor gone to Vatican City, I would have to say that she was viewing things wrong. Of course you’re going to point out one data point, your friend, to show your case. Big deal. That was one person. There are many other people who have been and have felt his presence. Frankly, I would more likely presume that your friend simply just does not feel Jesus’ presence.

Incidentally, I have been inside several Protestant churches. I felt no presence of God there. None. Period. But I have always felt His presence in any Catholic church I have been in.

So what’s your point about your friend? She’s not an authoritative figure.

I find it amusing and laughable that you would presume to know what Jesus would be on the side of.

And if Protestants are oh so humble with their plain churches, I ask them to put their money where there mouth is. Or rather, get rid of all of their money. “Greed” is a perception. Just because she is Catholic doesn’t make her some authority on the wealth, luxury and greed she perceived.

And you think Protestants have cornered the market that? I drive by two MEGA churches on my way to work. MEGA. There are a TON of those here in Dallas. I have yet to see a Catholic church that is so … business like that I see of the Protestant churches here. The immense wealth they display, large facilities that look, quite frankly, rather secular.

That’s your perspective. She’s not disengaged any more than you are. You think that because you can read scripture, pick and chose various passages to prove your point about what you believe, that you’re a grand theologian and can profess to know what Jesus would want.

If you go to church on Sunday and listen to your preacher preach about the Gospel, then I call you a hypocrite for making such a statement.

Everything that is done in the Catholic church is to bring the Christian closer to God, be in communion with Jesus Christ.

I wonder what Jesus would have said or done had you been around in His time, taken His word, then went off and preached about YOUR interpretation of His word. I truly do wonder that.

Oh… my. Did you just admit infallibility?!? GASP :rolleyes:

So clearly we can’t really take much of what you just said seriously. And by the way, you didn’t even really need to say this. Reading your post we can definitely see your perspective is SEVERELY limited.

So. I’m going to go into Morpheus mode from “The Matrix” - because I love that movie. 😃

Consider the possibility that what you see is not what you think it is. You presented annecdotal “evidence” to prove your case. Yet you refuse to see the other evidence. i.e. Those Catholics you see in the parking lot flipping other people off? Did you happen to turn your head towards the Catholic church and see the many OTHER Catholics who are helping other people? Taking time out of their day to do good works out of their love of Jesus Christ? Volunteering to help the poor, feed and clothe the needy, help pregnant teens get through life? You probably didn’t because you were so focused on trying to find evidence to prove to yourself that Catholics were fakes and liars.
I gave my disclaimer at the bottom of my post to avoid the attack of people like you. Some people will always only be harsh and bitter (you may or may not be one of them). From your response, you did not read all of my post at once. You responded to bits and pieces of it at a time with no regard to what I was saying further down). It appears to me that you were never trying to understand what I was saying. If you were wrong and I came here looking for answers, then you blew it - instead of giving me answers, it seems that you intentionally misunderstood me in order to make my words look ridiculous. When people respond this way, they clearly have no interest in dialogue, or thinking through questions. They want to be right and to tell people how it is. I’m interested in thinking things through and I believe that is what God desires of us - to work it out. Lewis describes the inhabitants of Hell in his book, ‘The Great Divorce.’ He says they are argumentative, they are bitter and they grumble.

In the way we interact with people it is supposed to be evident that we are His. It has not be evident to me that you are operating through His power/love.

“Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars in the universe as you hold out the world of life…” (Phil. 2:14-16a).

Personally I think we’ve clearly crossed the line when we are verbally attacking people.

Have a great day,
SW
 
I gave my disclaimer at the bottom of my post to avoid the attack of people like you. Some people will always only be harsh and bitter (you may or may not be one of them). From your response, you did not read all of my post at once. You responded to bits and pieces of it at a time with no regard to what I was saying further down). It appears to me that you were never trying to understand what I was saying. If you were wrong and I came here looking for answers, then you blew it - instead of giving me answers, it seems that you intentionally misunderstood me in order to make my words look ridiculous. When people respond this way, they clearly have no interest in dialogue, or thinking through questions. They want to be right and to tell people how it is. I’m interested in thinking things through and I believe that is what God desires of us - to work it out. Lewis describes the inhabitants of Hell in his book, ‘The Great Divorce.’ He says they are argumentative, they are bitter and they grumble.

In the way we interact with people it is supposed to be evident that we are His. It has not be evident to me that you are operating through His power/love.

“Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars in the universe as you hold out the world of life…” (Phil. 2:14-16a).

Personally I think we’ve clearly crossed the line when we are verbally attacking people.

Have a great day,
SW
I did read your post all at once.

And I suggest you take a read at that scripture that you posted. I also seem to remember something about plucking the log from your own eye before pointing out the speck in others… something like that. But then, since I don’t have chapter and verse I’m not a “good” Christian.
 
I did read your post all at once.

And I suggest you take a read at that scripture that you posted. I also seem to remember something about plucking the log from your own eye before pointing out the speck in others… something like that. But then, since I don’t have chapter and verse I’m not a “good” Christian.
I think you are argumentative and bitter. I was never trying to paint all Catholics with the same brush and I am fully aware of shortcomings among protestants. You turned this into an attack on Catholicism - I was just asking questions.
 
I’m just asking questions. I’m not making accusations. I do wonder if being born into the Catholic church makes some people feel a little manipulated. They’ve been christened without their consent and then the time comes for them to receive confirmation and everyone they went to school with is doing it and their entire family expects them to do it. It seems a little forced… some people might go through the motions just to get the rest of us off of their backs.

SW
And many cradle Catholics view their upbringing in the Church as one of the greatest gifts in their lives.

A child born and raised in a Protestant Church is expected to grow up in that faith. I don’t think the expectation and pressure to follow their parent’s religion and do what is viewed as the right thing would really be any different.

My husband is a cradle Catholic and said it was stressed at his confirmation that if they didn’t really believe or they didn’t want to be confirmed not to do it. He said that that point was absolutely stressed. And he’s one of those cradle Catholics that believe the gift of growing up in the Church is the greatest gift his parents gave him. 🙂
 
For those who deny infant baptism, the burden of proof is upon you to show that in all of the verses listed there were no infants in all of those households and families.

Jesus Christ said in Matt 19:14, “Let the little children be, and do not hinder them from coming to me.”
He also said in John 3:5, “…unless a man be born again of water and the Spirit HE CANNOT ENTER INTO THE KINGDOM OF GOD.”
How are they to come to Him unless they are Baptized?
Those who say not to Baptize infants clearly have a Biblical conflict here, and they risk the salvation of the souls of their children…

Can you help with your interpretation of these verse,Thank You
Wait, when does baptism guarantee that your child, even as an infant, is going to definetly go to Heaven?

Being baptized is important for Christians, but it doesn’t get you saved and going to heaven. Belief in Jesus Christ does that. You have to choose to live your life for Him & for yourself

Tell me this: How do RC’s address the following?:

1.) Miscarriages/ stillborns/abortions - all in which the poor child had no chance at life, much less a baptism.

2.) A person who was baptized as a baby but left church and lived in unbelief of Jesus until his/her death.
 
I think you are argumentative and bitter. I was never trying to paint all Catholics with the same brush and I am fully aware of shortcomings among protestants. You turned this into an attack on Catholicism - I was just asking questions.
I am far from bitter. I am, however, fed up with lies perpetuated about Catholicism. And quite frankly, your “just asking questions” were an attack. And you did paint all Catholics by pointing out the few as evidence.

Have a good day.
 
I gave my disclaimer at the bottom of my post to avoid the attack of people like you. Some people will always only be harsh and bitter (you may or may not be one of them). From your response, you did not read all of my post at once. You responded to bits and pieces of it at a time with no regard to what I was saying further down). It appears to me that you were never trying to understand what I was saying. If you were wrong and I came here looking for answers, then you blew it - instead of giving me answers, it seems that you intentionally misunderstood me in order to make my words look ridiculous. When people respond this way, they clearly have no interest in dialogue, or thinking through questions. They want to be right and to tell people how it is. I’m interested in thinking things through and I believe that is what God desires of us - to work it out. Lewis describes the inhabitants of Hell in his book, ‘The Great Divorce.’ He says they are argumentative, they are bitter and they grumble.

In the way we interact with people it is supposed to be evident that we are His. It has not be evident to me that you are operating through His power/love.

“Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars in the universe as you hold out the world of life…” (Phil. 2:14-16a).

Personally I think we’ve clearly crossed the line when we are verbally attacking people.

Have a great day,
SW
I’ve been reading both sides of your entire conversation (all at once, or at least as much at once as I can read with an eleven month old playing at my feet) and I really don’t see anyone being inappropriate. People are passionate about religion. When you attack someone’s beliefs and tell them that they’re wrong, you’re going to get a strong response. I know that when people say harsh things on the forum they’re responding to something I’ve said and that it’s not a personal attack on me as a person. And a lot of times they’re really trying to help.

You can’t right about all the Catholics you’ve known that were such bad people (and you have to admit that that’s how your comments could be read) and then get upset when you get a heated response.

You may say that you were just asking questions, but even written questions can have tone. I think GodIsGracious answered many of your questions well.

If you don’t want the answer to a question, don’t ask it. And when you get the answer, actually think about the response, rather then just taking offense at some imagined insult.

I hope you don’t think I’m being mean by saying this! I truly do! We’re all seeking the truth. And people are passionate about that!
 
Ok, let me try to tackle this a little at a time. Thanks for the reply RedSoxWife. I quite enjoy a good “Iron sharpening Iron”.
Hello Dyluck,
The Bible has as much validity as the creeds of the Church which had been inspired by God. After all it was men inspired by God who indeed wrote the Bible. Though you are trying to make them sound mutually exclusive which they are not. They come together in a perfect harmony and never contradict each other. Remember Dyluck, that without Church Councils there is not Doctrine of the Trinity.
I do believe that the bible was written by God inspired men and that it is 100% infallible. Cannon was written by men. How can I tell if it is inspired by God or not? The bible…
The bible says to test the spirit.
Firstly, there is cannon that is not referred or supported by the perfect word of God in which I believe God has sustained it through the age and infallible.
Let’s take one of Martin Luthar’s biggest indictments of the Catholic Cannon.
  1. Indulgences (which is now being re-adopted by the Catholic Church).
    Find me 1 piece of scripture that God supports acts of indulgence forgiven for money? And then say this was inspired by God? If you want, I can find many others, but I think that is for another topic 😉
The baptism of desire or blood is not mentioned anywhere in the Bible, but then again that should not surprise any Bible scholar. The Trinity among other concepts are not mentioned in the Bible though they may be referred to. IE the “good thief” by his desire to be with God and his longing to be with Jesus has given him either a baptism of desire, or being a martyr a baptism of blood. As Christ says to him, he will one day be with Christ in paradise.
You are right, the Word “Trinity” is not found anywhere in the bible along with other words like “rapture” etc. However, unlike the practice of Blood and Desire baptisms, Trinity in it’s definition, doctrine etc is found all over the bible many times over. Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Now find the act of Blood and Desire Baptism in the bible?
Or are they dangerous man inspired declarations of salvation to a man that is to be judged by God?
Moving to your next issue. The stressing of the “FREE FREE FREE” gift of salvation. Catholics universally agree that grace is God’s free gift for mankind. All they have to do is accept God’s gift. As for the Bible ever advocating, with out exception, Sola Fide please reference this, because that comment is unbiblical.
I’m only going to comment on this a little bit. If you do not understand the Supremacy and solidarity of God, you cannot understand “Sola Fide”. You say it’s unbiblical, but you tell me where in the bible you find that man plays a part in his own salvation? Yet I find in the bible that we are justified by faith through Grace.

You want to know about justification by faith? Read the following passage:
Romans 3:23-26 23for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed; 26for the demonstration, I say, of His righteousness at the present time, so that He would be just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.
Though with selected reading of the bible and totally ignoring the Catholic letters in the bible its easy enough to see where misunderstanding could arise.
Catholic Letters? What do you mean by that?
Christ did not endure that wrath of God. He endured the wrath of man. In doing so he conquered sin so that we may be forgiven.
You are telling me that Jesus paid an eternal price before an eternal God with eternal consequences by the hands of finite men? Christ’s suffering at the hands of men and of course and I don’t mean to downplay the suffering of Christ, but the climax of the Gospel and the redemption of man was not because man tortured Christ. It is because God broke Christ.
Let me prove it biblically:
  1. Jesus Prays to the Father to take “the cup” from him in the Mount of Olives (3 times) Luke 22:39-44. He prayed earnestly to the point of sweating blood. (on a side note, where in history has any man sweat blood because they were about to be tortured and die?). How many Christians went smiling to a burning cross for the sake of His name? You think Christ was afraid of men? Christ was the one that said Do not fear man that can break your bones, fear God that can send your Soul to Hell…
    Luke 12:4-5 4"I tell you, my friends, do not be afraid of those who kill the body and after that can do no more. 5But I will show you whom you should fear: Fear him who, after the killing of the body, has power to throw you into hell. Yes, I tell you, fear him.”
  2. What was in the cup? Well certainly not the wrath of men. Jeremiah 25:15 (read full context Verse 15-38… Sounds A LOT scarier then men’s wrath, that’s for sure.
  3. And it pleased God to Crush Christ: Isaiah 53:10
    But the LORD was pleased To crush Him, putting Him to grief; If He would render Himself as a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, And the good pleasure of the LORD will prosper in His hand. 11As a result of the anguish of His soul, {not body} He will see it and be satisfied {justice satisfied}; By His knowledge the Righteous One, My Servant, will justify the many, As He will bear their iniquities.
Do you honestly think God turned his back to his own son because he couldn’t handle watching him suffer under the hands of men?
NO. It is because Christ became the very abomination God hates…
THAT is why it pleased God to crush his own Son.
 
The individual only has control of his own soul, either he chooses to follow God as a Caritas filled Christian or he chooses Death. God doesn’t force us with predestination. He lets us choose for ourselves.
If that were true then I feel like throwing out like more then half of the bible then because the majority of the bible is a contradiction and this “religion” is just as good as all the rest of the religions in the world: Relying on man’s decisions and man’s ability to come to God (who is no longer infinite because man has some power over God to make decisions outside of the Sovereign Will of God…
Tell me, where did Pharaoh have the choice to let the Jews go when God specifically says that “He will harden pharaoh’s heart”? What choice did Esau have when God chose to Hate him before he was even born? What choice does man have when Sin was imputed (by God) to man due to the sin of Adam? Read Romans 9 very carefully for example.
If you want, PM me and I will send you an unbelievable set of full passages that you cannot deny the predestination of God.

The key is God is infinite. The bible says NOTHING happens outside of the will of God. Therefore the actions / decisions of men do not fall outside of that will.

Example: I can chose to throw a vase across the room and it will smash. The question you have to ask yourself, if I threw it, did I act beyond the will of God? Or if I didn’t, was that God’s plan??
Bible says everything God does, it is for His own Glory and purpose. Nothing happens outside the Will of God… therefore God controls everything. Man has no part in it. Research the Solidarity of God. What motivation did an Infinitely Holy God have to create you and me? Certainly not our merit or foreknowledge of the condition of our hearts, that is for sure.
Ok to put this nicely… this is entirely wrong. You’re french kissing heresy here. Jesus never became sin nor did the Father ever turn his back on the Son.
I’ve never heard of French kissing heresy… Is that better or worse then Bordering On heresy?
RedSoxWife, The bible is plain as day on this matter. In fact, another person here noted the following versus:
2 Corinthians 5:21
21He made Him who knew no sin to be sin on our behalf, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Matthew 27:46….
About the ninth hour Jesus cried out with a loud voice, saying, “ELI, ELI, LAMA SABACHTHANI?” that is, “MY GOD, MY GOD, WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME?”

Not only did Jesus yell, but he repeated “My God”, which in Jewish culture was like deep emphasis on something. Here we see a separation of the eternal God head… I used “turning His back”, sorry the word is “Forsake”… (worse then just turning one’s back)… Forsake means to completely abandon, renounce, or turn away entirely. (Look it up in the dictionary). And if you still don’t believe me on “forsake” look it up in the Greek text. God turned his back…
I understand what you are trying to say, I think, but you are coming up with the wrong conclusions. The Father’s wrath was do to the death of the Son. Not because the Son had become sin.
Well if it pleased God to Crush Him, why would His wrath be because of his Physical Death? What you don’t understand is that not only did Jesus resurrect from physical Death, but he also resurrected from Spiritual Death under the eternal Wrath of God (Point being: the major consequence for sinning against God. “The price”). Eternal death under the full measure of the Wrath of God the price Jesus paid.
Sin can never permeate the divine Jesus’ flesh what so ever. To suggest such a thing is to take the greatest purity and throw it in the mud by an outhouse. I dare say you do not understand what you are saying by your implications.
I honestly don’t understand what you mean about permeate the Flesh?

The second part about mud and outhouse… What suggestion am I brining to the Son of Glory? This is the work of God on the Cross… You want some Romanic Gospel? The Gospel of the bible is Scandalous and Amazing!
People who declare the true gospel sound like mad men to dead bones. It is only by the Holy Spirit opening the ears of a deaf and decayed heart in which an elect Child of God will respond to such a wonderful saving grace!

Read Psalms 22 Please… It’s like Christ was speaking right through the Psalmist about his purpose on the cross.
Christ died an innocent death and free from sin. Only in this way could sin have been destroyed and salvation possible to those who follow Christ.
Absolutely 100% True 🙂 That is why he was the perfect sacrifice. Christ out-weighs everything in creation, utterly innocent and with out blemish. Instead of God pouring out his wrath upon us for what we deserve, pours his wrath on the one who doesn’t deserve it.
Thanks for bringing this up though Brother in Christ. We have a lot to work on!
I’d like that 🙂

Sorry for the length, just wanted to address everything.

God Bless
 
And many cradle Catholics view their upbringing in the Church as one of the greatest gifts in their lives.

A child born and raised in a Protestant Church is expected to grow up in that faith. I don’t think the expectation and pressure to follow their parent’s religion and do what is viewed as the right thing would really be any different.

My husband is a cradle Catholic and said it was stressed at his confirmation that if they didn’t really believe or they didn’t want to be confirmed not to do it. He said that that point was absolutely stressed. And he’s one of those cradle Catholics that believe the gift of growing up in the Church is the greatest gift his parents gave him. 🙂
There is one significant difference. Should a Catholic choose to fellowship with a different church his familly believes that the son is living in a state of mortal sin. Should a son raised by United Methodist grow up to fellowship in a Missionary Baptist Church that is all it is, the son has a different home church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top