Why do some people consider the Bible Sexist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GreggSchaffter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

GreggSchaffter

Guest
So, I have run into a bunch of people(Christian and non-Christian) who consider the Bible to be very sexist. In my honest opinion, and from reading the Bible numerous times, the Bible contains no sexism of any form. For example, some people consider the Adam and Eve part to be very sexist. What do you guys think?
 
I’m not sure how this concerns Eastern Catholicism. I think this would be more applicable to the Sacred Scripture section of the Apologetics forum.

In Christ,
Nicholas
 
I didn’t know where to really post this in. Can a moderator please move this topic to the right area? I will try to post my next posts in the right sections.

Thanks for telling me though.
 
I don’t think its sexist…Many people just don’t like the Bible because it doesn’t fit there agenda…Like how Women are not suppose to lead a service with Males and Females in attendance.
 
40.png
Catherine_Grant:
It is becoming a problem for me when people post comments in a thread where the readers can’t do anything about it, but don’t write me when I can.

If a thread might belong somewhere else, people comment in the thread, and I’m not told, the thread doesn’t get moved. If I then see that it needs to be moved, it looks funny to read the thread in Apologetics asking throughout if it should belong elsewhere when the elsewhere is really where it is. It can be very confusing.

**The best policy is to respond to the topic of the thread if you want to, and to write me a private note explaining why you think that topic belongs on another board. **You can reach me through a PM or by clicking the red triangle in the upper right of a post.

May God Bless You Abundantly,
Catherine Grant
Eastern Catholicism Moderator
 
So, I have run into a bunch of people(Christian and non-Christian) who consider the Bible to be very sexist. In my honest opinion, and from reading the Bible numerous times, the Bible contains no sexism of any form. For example, some people consider the Adam and Eve part to be very sexist. What do you guys think?
Whoever says that the bible is offending one or the other gender has ignored its content.

I could pick out some bible verses, that could make you think, that God doesn’t like women or men or children.

God loves women. How else could Mary be the Queen of heaven and earth and Queen above all saints?
God loves men. How else could Jesus be born of the spotless Virgin Mary?
God loves his children. How else could he promise paradise?

I would give them a link to study the Theology of the Body by JPII and the encyclical humanae vitae
 
So, I have run into a bunch of people(Christian and non-Christian) who consider the Bible to be very sexist. In my honest opinion, and from reading the Bible numerous times, the Bible contains no sexism of any form. For example, some people consider the Adam and Eve part to be very sexist. What do you guys think?
The only people who would even dare to consider the Bible sexist are: (a) those who haven’t read the Bible and are ignorant of its content, and (b) those who are infected with radical feminism.
With the first group (a), you can’t argue with them because as a very wise comedian said,
“you can’t fix stupid”. As for the 2nd group, you cannot reason with fanatics who have a political agenda.
What no one under 40 wishes to address is that feminism is one of those periodic political/social fads that infect American society. The few adherants of feminism are followers of a very few female writers-some of which are pushing a homosexual anti-male agenda and others are simply mercenary publicists. This movement has lost its fire of 20 years ago and is no longer considered as mainstream by many intellectuals. It lives on only amongst those in second rate universities and amongst the young (the wannabe’s), who are not part of the mainstream of American society
Radical feminism is not compatible with Catholicism
 
People interpret the Bible differently than others and may see things others don’t, even if they are completely wrong
 
Well, frankly, you can’t flick a rock without being labelled sexist or homophobic these days.
 
From a modern day perspective, it’s easy to see why many people would view the bible as sexist. Sure there are clear differences in what men and women did in biblical times. Regardless, the bible is still the inspired word of god(2 Tim.3:16).
 
I wouldn’t even respond to people who think like that. How silly. 😛
 
It’s really not that hard to understand why some people would consider the Bible sexist, especially when the come across passages in which fathers offer up their daughters for the night to passerby’s and visitors, or when women were stoned for adultery but rarely was the man involved ever mentioned (if at all), or when women were told to keep quiet at services and ‘ask your husband’ if they have any questions. Just to name a few reasons…
 
Well here was one debate I had with someone about the Adam and Eve story in the Bible. They said that it is sexist due to the fact that Eve got more punishment than Adam did even though they committed the same act. Here was my response to the argument.
Yes, both Adam and Eve did both commit a sin, but it was to the extent of the sin that determined the punishment. The reason why Eve had more punishment was due to the fact that she first used Adam’s love trust as being as wife to convince him to eat the Apple. Second, she lied to her own husband about eating the Apple. While Adam may have eaten the apple and committed a sin, Eve committed 3 sins; eating the apple, lying to Adam, and using Adam’s trust to convince him to eat the apple.
Do you think my argument is valid, or do you think it doesn’t really make a point?
 
Well here was one debate I had with someone about the Adam and Eve story in the Bible. They said that it is sexist due to the fact that Eve got more punishment than Adam did even though they committed the same act. Here was my response to the argument.
Yes, both Adam and Eve did both commit a sin, but it was to the extent of the sin that determined the punishment. The reason why Eve had more punishment was due to the fact that she first used Adam’s love trust as being as wife to convince him to eat the Apple. Second, she lied to her own husband about eating the Apple. While Adam may have eaten the apple and committed a sin, Eve committed 3 sins; eating the apple, lying to Adam, and using Adam’s trust to convince him to eat the apple.
I can’t see how your argument has any validity when someone is talking about what the read in the Bible, and what conclusions they draw from reading the Bible. The Bible doesn’t say anything about Eve lying to her own husband about eating the Apple, or using Adam’s trust to convince him to eat the apple. It simply says this:
[1] Now the serpent was more subtle than any of the beasts of the earth which the Lord God had made. And he said to the woman: Why hath God commanded you, that you should not eat of every tree of paradise? [2] And the woman answered him, saying: Of the fruit of the trees that are in paradise we do eat: [3] But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of paradise, God hath commanded us that we should not eat; and that we should not touch it, lest perhaps we die. [4] And the serpent said to the woman: No, you shall not die the death. [5] For God doth know that in what day soever you shall eat thereof, your eyes shall be opened: and you shall be as Gods, knowing good and evil.
[6] And the woman saw that the tree was good to eat, and fair to the eyes, and delightful to behold: and she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave to her husband who did eat. [7] And the eyes of them both were opened: and when they perceived themselves to be naked, they sewed together fig leaves, and made themselves aprons. [8] And when they heard the voice of the Lord God walking in paradise at the afternoon air, Adam and his wife hid themselves from the face of the Lord God, amidst the trees of paradise. [9] And the Lord God called Adam, and said to him: Where art thou? [10] And he said: I heard thy voice in paradise; and I was afraid, because I was naked, and I hid myself.
[11] And he said to him: And who hath told thee that thou wast naked, but that thou hast eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat? [12] And Adam said: The woman, whom thou gavest me to be my companion, gave me of the tree, and I did eat. [13] And the Lord God said to the woman: Why hast thou done this? And she answered: The serpent deceived me, and I did eat. [14] And the Lord God said to the serpent: Because thou hast done this thing, thou art cursed among all cattle, and beasts of the earth: upon thy breast shalt thou go, and earth shalt thou eat all the days of thy life. [15] I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel.
[16] To the woman also he said: I will multiply thy sorrows, and thy conceptions: in sorrow shalt thou bring forth children, and thou shalt be under thy husband’s power, and he shall have dominion over thee. [17] And to Adam he said: Because thou hast hearkened to the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldst not eat, cursed is the earth in thy work; with labour and toil shalt thou eat thereof all the days of thy life. [18] Thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herbs of the earth. [19] In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread till thou return to the earth, out of which thou wast taken: for dust thou art, and into dust thou shalt return. [20] And Adam called the name of his wife Eve: because she was the mother of all the living.
The time in which the above was written was certainly written during a time when women were ‘under thy husband’s power, and he shall have dominion over thee’ tho…which thankfully isn’t true today anymore. :rolleyes:
 
Well here was one debate I had with someone about the Adam and Eve story in the Bible. They said that it is sexist due to the fact that Eve got more punishment than Adam did even though they committed the same act. Here was my response to the argument.

Do you think my argument is valid, or do you think it doesn’t really make a point?
These two posts from Marc Anthony & jmcrae answer your question quite well.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=9491578&postcount=52

forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=9491578&postcount=52
 
It’s really not that hard to understand why some people would consider the Bible sexist, especially when the come across passages in which fathers offer up their daughters for the night to passerby’s and visitors, or when women were stoned for adultery but rarely was the man involved ever mentioned (if at all), or when women were told to keep quiet at services and ‘ask your husband’ if they have any questions. Just to name a few reasons…
So you think the Bible is sexist then? Or do you just see how it can be easily misinterpreted?
 
So you think the Bible is sexist then? Or do you just see how it can be easily misinterpreted?
I know it is sexist…it was written in a backwards time period, when it was terribly sexist. For example: It’s not exactly noble to lend out your daughters to passerby’s…nor is it holy. Yet holy men did just that. Some would consider it sexist. Some would consider it plain old immoral. Others would consider the time in which it was written and agree that, yeah it’s a bit sexist. There’s not much to misinterpret about that.
 
I know it is sexist…it was written in a backwards time period, when it was terribly sexist. For example: It’s not exactly noble to lend out your daughters to passerby’s…nor is it holy. Yet holy men did just that. Some would consider it sexist. Some would consider it plain old immoral. Others would consider the time in which it was written and agree that, yeah it’s a bit sexist. There’s not much to misinterpret about that.
It would have been nicer to have your guests abused? Hospitality was very, very important in those cultures.

I always laugh at people who try to project their 21st century morals on societies from 3000 years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top