T
tonyrey
Guest
The stock objection to the Free Will defence of the Problem of Evil is that God shouldn’t have given us so much power. Yet no one has explained how all cruelty could be prevented. Even animals with limited knowledge and intelligence ill-treat and kill their own species. It is very easy to criticise the world but to create a better one is far more difficult and in the absence of a solution we are not justified in believing it is possible.
To take the blessings of life for granted and to condemn its drawbacks is a very shallow philosophy. It is a blatant example of senseless ingratitude. There is wisdom in the saying we should take the rough with the smooth. The only logical alternative is to agree with Schopenhauer that it would have been better if life had never existed on this planet. Ironically he was very attached to his pet poodles! Sceptics, pessimists and those who blame the Devil always contradict themselves sooner or later…
To take the blessings of life for granted and to condemn its drawbacks is a very shallow philosophy. It is a blatant example of senseless ingratitude. There is wisdom in the saying we should take the rough with the smooth. The only logical alternative is to agree with Schopenhauer that it would have been better if life had never existed on this planet. Ironically he was very attached to his pet poodles! Sceptics, pessimists and those who blame the Devil always contradict themselves sooner or later…