A
akck
Guest
Why does God create souls he know will wind up in hell?
My answer is the following; God wants to save as many souls as possible, but He respects man’s free will. If God saved us against our free will, He would destroy our essence of human beings. We are free to love Him or to despise Him.This means that God has to convince us to abandon evil and sin, and the fear of damnation in Hell may have a role in man’s choice to abandon sin, expecially when he is still much involved in sin.Why does God create souls he know will wind up in hell?
A person would not be able to have the Beatific Vision without first choosing charity over malice.Why does God create souls he know will wind up in hell?
52 God, who “dwells in unapproachable light”, wants to communicate his own divine life to the men he freely created, in order to adopt them as his sons in his only-begotten Son.3 By revealing himself God wishes to make them capable of responding to him, and of knowing him and of loving him far beyond their own natural capacity.
1730 God created man a rational being, conferring on him the dignity of a person who can initiate and control his own actions. "God willed that man should be ‘left in the hand of his own counsel,’ so that he might of his own accord seek his Creator and freely attain his full and blessed perfection by cleaving to him."26
Man is rational and therefore like God; he is created with free will and is master over his acts.27
My take on it is that He doesn’t. There’s a whole debate about whether God’s omniscience includes what’s called “middle knowledge” (that is, stuff that isn’t real, but which could’ve been real if things were otherwise). There’s a perspective that claims that this isn’t included in omniscience, and it doesn’t mean that God isn’t omniscient if He doesn’t know the stuff that will never occur.Why does God create souls he know will wind up in hell?
LET’S SEE WHAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH SAY ABOUT ITMy answer is the following; God wants to save as many souls as possible, but He respects man’s free will.
I perfectly know and I have never said the opposite.My point is @Mmarco to show you, we cannot save ourselves, we cannot keep ourselves saved.
So, it is God’s responsibility to save the entire human race because our fate/ destiny is not in us, it is in God.
.
GOD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SALVATION OF THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE
Yes @Mmarco, we are able to reject God graces, but no one rejected the grace of God in the past whom He want to save.“while God touches the heart of man by the illumination of the Holy Ghost, neither is man himself utterly without doing anything while he receives that inspiration, forasmuch as he is also able to reject it.”
I have never said someone rejected the grace of God in the past whom He want to save.Mmarco:
Yes @Mmarco, we are able to reject God graces, but no one rejected the grace of God in the past whom He want to save.“while God touches the heart of man by the illumination of the Holy Ghost, neither is man himself utterly without doing anything while he receives that inspiration, forasmuch as he is also able to reject it.”
The three Divine or Theological Virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity are infused with Sanctifying grace, (De fide dogma).I have never said someone rejected the grace of God in the past whom He want to save.
St. Thomas (C. G., II, xxviii) if God’s purpose were made dependent on the foreseen free act of any creature, God would thereby sacrifice His own freedom, and would submit Himself to His creatures, thus abdicating His essential supremacy a thing which is, of course, utterly inconceivable.There are souls who despise My graces as well as all the proofs of My love. They do not wish to hear My call, but proceed into the abyss of hell. The loss of these souls plunges Me into deadly sorrow. God though I am, I cannot help such a soul because it scorns Me; having a free will, it can spurn Me or love Me.
I totally agree; God gives the sanctifying grace only to those who freely cooperate with His grace; God has always known who are those who would cooperate with His grace.The three Divine or Theological Virtues of Faith, Hope and Charity are infused with Sanctifying grace, (De fide dogma).
I totally agree; God gives the gift of obedience only to those who freely cooperate with His grace; God has always known who are those who would cooperate with His grace.CCCS 1990-1991 In this gift, faith, hope, charity, and OBEDIENCE TO GOD’S WILL are given to us.
I totally agree; God does not force our will, because He the gift of obedience only to those who freely cooperate with His grace; God has always known who are those who would cooperate with His grace.De Veritatis: Aquinas said, “ God changes the will without forcing it. But he can change the will from the fact that he himself operates in the will as he does in nature,” De Veritatis 22:9. 31. ST I-II:112:3. 32. Gaudium et Spes 22; "being …
I totally agree; God operates in our will, but He does not force our will because He has always known who are those who would cooperate with His grace.Because God himself operates in our will He causes all our actions and we all freely do what we want to do and we don’t even realize, we are freely cooperating with His graces. – CCC 307, CCC 308, etc.
No, because God has decided to save only those whom He has always known would cooperate with His saving grace.Do you believe @Mmarco, is it possible that in the future someone will reject the grace of God whom He decided to save?
I disagree; God has freely chosen to create man with a free will and to respect man’s free will. I think that the idea that God could not make His purpose dependent on the foreseen free will of man, represents an inacceptable limit to God’s omnipotence and freedom.St. Thomas (C. G., II, xxviii) if God’s purpose were made dependent on the foreseen free act of any creature, God would thereby sacrifice His own freedom, and would submit Himself to His creatures, thus abdicating His essential supremacy a thing which is, of course, utterly inconceivable.
Personally, I do not see any contradictions. It seems to me that you do not accept the idea of man’s free will.As we see above, Saint Faustina’s above statement totally contradict with Catholic Soteriology. – I’m not surprised that no one have to believe personal revelations.
He doesn’t. Get ready for a slew of posts about “aided free will.” The argument of “primary causation” and “secondary causation” tends to go nowhere, and just leads to another post or three filled with quotes from the 1907 Catholic Encyclopedia.Personally, I do not see any contradictions. It seems to me that you do not accept the idea of man’s free will.
Yeah; been there, done that, not going back.Get ready for a slew of posts
First, fantastic analogy .(Since I’m a Pittsburgh Steelers fan, my sarcastic way of describing this is to ask “does God know which Cleveland Browns player scored the winning touchdown in last year’s Super Bowl? Of course not – 'cause they’ve never played in one! But, that doesn’t mean that God’s not omniscient – just that the Browns are hapless!”)
Good question on a subtle point!!!Well, clearly that would mean that the act of birth and damnation are to him both real and existing, therefore there can’t be this middle knowledge for him on the subject of salvation at all.
Wait, hold on. The created realm is outside the temporal framework?? This part of your post is confusing me, as this realm is created and most certainly holds itself in time. Did you misword yourself? As I said, this part keeps me from understanding the rest of the post.And, since the created realm is created outside of a temporal framework…