The intent of the devotion was not to be “Our Lady’s Psalter”. The intent was to bring people to Our Lord, to convert nations, however you’d like to put it. Adding the Luminous Mysteries does not change this intent. Again, can someone show me how it would be wrong, evil, lacking to meditate on more of Christ’s life in an effort to convert the nations?
No one can show you that it is wrong, evil or lacking to meditate on the Luminous mysteries, because it is not. That is not the intent of the argument against having them added to the Rosary. Why do you find it necessary to suggest that by defending the traditional method of the Rosary with 15 decades, one is therefore saying that the Luminous mysteries are evil? You are purposely creating division with such nonsense. And yes, the intention of the devotion was to be Our Lady’s Psalter, whether that is your intent or not.
You’re kidding me? You actually think that the intent of the devotion was a name?
What? I said the name of the devotion is Our Lady’s Psalter. The intent is to honor Our Lady with Aves representing the 150 psalms.
I think you’re just bent on arguing with any traditionalist for whatever reason. According to St. Thomas Aquinas, the Psalms are divided into 3 parts of 50 psalms. These 3 parts represent the states of penance, justice and glory. It is called Our Lady’s Psalter because it contains 150 Aves which represent the 150 Psalms of David.
I’m not bent on arguing with any traditionalist. I only debate those who’s theories lack historical accuracy. Again, I suggest this:
And I daresay the numbers rarely register in the thoughts of most Catholics saying the Rosary, ever. And it’s not as if we’re being asked to meditate on error. We asked to look at other crucial events in the life of Christ.
Sorry…I thought it was a good parallel of a Pope altering a sacramental given by Our Lady
.Well then, I guess you’ve already got your answer.the scpaular has nothing to do with the title of this post. once again my posts are getting derailed. sigh…i don’t get why you guys cannot remain somewhat civil and discuss things about the post and keep it on track. iam asking about why the sspx and nothing else, the sspx, why they do not say the luminous mysteries. no one else. just the sspx. i hope i made that clear. we are no there to debate the psalters or anything else. just the sspx and why they do not say the luminous mysteries,. again, that is all. nothing else.did i not ask in my op, to please not argue? yes i did.
sspx draws alot of bad arguing. i don’t want that to happen i made that clear in my post. i made it clear.i dont post things liek this to draw arguments iam trying to understand why certain groups do the thing they do or believe what they believe. this is about the sspx and why they do not say the luminous mysteries so please respect that.sheesh.
That said, I would think that it would be good to discuss the merits or lack thereof of their beliefs.I think you were answered quite early on. You, as the thread’s initiator, can ask the moderators to close the thread once your question is answered.
Uhh, JKIRK, I think that’s a banned website here… 春日野结衣免费观看,卡一卡二卡三免费网站,日本欧美成人高清电影,亚洲国产在线2020最新
I say the Luminous Mysteries every Thursday, and lots of people call me a rad trad. I like the idea of a chaplet, though. I never thought of it before. Hmmm…
hmm, a chaplet? interesting.
See what I mean? This isn’t a “Traditionalist” thing.
good point bear. how can meditating on our Lord be a bad thing???I don’t really see the difference. It certainly can’t be a bad thing to meditate on the Luminous Mysteries so, however it gets done… That said, if one is saying the complete Rosary, why wouldn’t you add this “chaplet” in? It certainly couldn’t be bad to do something you consider extra.
This reminds me, my BIL has set of “Irish” Rosary beads. It has the traditional 5 decades plus an extra. No meditation. It’s strictly an intercessory decade for Ireland. The horrors!
