I see that the definition of UltraMontanism is posted above.
Not all Roman Catholics are Ultramontanists, it is rather a party in the church, but it grew from a tolerated faction of the church to the dominant party and now demands that all believers subscribe to it’s particular theologeumena, which is not acceptable.
Ultamontanism has no connection with Montanism, but I would call it a modern error.
Michael
Thank you both Hesychios and Mickey. Come to think of it, I have heard that before…
But what do yo mean by “the dominant party now demands that all subscribe to it’s particular theologeumena, which is not acceptable.”???
I have a feeling you might be referring to an Orthodox-RC argument that I’m not familiar with… for my part, I think it only makes sense that the Holy See would act as the Church’s teaching head.
One example of the need comes to mind…Pope Paul VI’s rather prophetic word concerning the evils that would come about if the world embraced a contraceptive mentality. If only all the faithful would have read that little encyclical!!!
I read on an earlier post (I think yours, Hesychios), that this was not always so and that the “governmental” authority used to be more in the hands of the local bishops. I don’t argue that that would be fine, but it still seems to me that it is necessary to have a “Supreme Court,” if you will.
Bear with me, I may have more questions to come and I’ve never even consider our differences before. (in fact, I think we should get over ourselves, get it together, and finally get together)
RAR