“Before Abraham, I AM”
Jesus was Jewish, and that’s not Jewish; therefore, not true.
Also before his execution the Sanhedrin ask him if he is the Son of God. And He answers in the positive. Never once did he deny it.
**Are you sure he answered in the positive and did not deny it? You are not focused when reading your NT. His answer was, “You said so.” That’s not positive. It could even be negative. Besides, as he continued, he said, “And you will see the son of man coming…” What did he say? Did he continue the thought of the High Priest? No, he did not. He changed his question in the answer. If the question was son of God, he fixed the answer with son of man. That’s quite something else, which only faith prevents one from seeing the difference. **
Also Peter answered, when Jesus asked “So who do you say that I am”, and Peter answered “Your are the Christ, the Son of the living God”. Then Jesus answered in the affirmative and declared Peter to be the holder of the Keys and the Rock of the Church.
Peter could have never said that for two reasons: First, because the expression started with Paul 30 years later. And second, Peter was a member of the Sect of the Nazarenes headquartered in Jerusalem and coexisting peacefully with mainstream Judaism. (Acts 9:31) When Paul showed up in Jerusalem with that exact message, he got almost killed for preaching apostasy. It’s only obvious that the Apostles did not know about such a thing.
When I was saying “they” I had meant the character of each in the Trinity. Like when Jacob wrestled with the angel of God. Another ‘character’ of him. Or the burning bush. Or the angel in the fiery pit with Daniel. Genesis talks about God in heaven and God on earth, Genesis 19:23 ,Zechariah 3:1-2 (YHWH calling upon YHWH: “And the LORD said unto Satan, The LORD rebuke thee, O Satan”
**That’s all metaphorical. **
“And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn son. – Zechariah 12:10
That’s a reference to the Jews returning from Babylon. In Jerusalem they would ponder on the cause of their happy chance to start their lives again in Jerusalem, that it was all due to the sacrifice of Israel, who had been removed so that Judah would remain forever. So, the Jews would, in their memory, look at him (Israel) whom they had pierced with their sins, and mourn for him as one mourn for his firsborn.
*"I kept looking in the night visions, And behold, with the clouds of heaven One like a Son of Man was coming, And He came up to the Ancient of Days And was presented before Him. "And to Him was given dominion, Glory and a kingdom, That all the peoples, nations, and men of every language Might serve Him. His dominion is an everlasting dominion Which will not pass away; And His kingdom is one Which will not be destroyed. (Daniel 7:13-14) *
**That was a prophetical vision to be fulfilled in Judah eventually. **
We must also remember that the Prophet Daniel predicted the messiah would come before the destruction of the temple. Meaning he had to have come before A.D. 70.
That prophecy of Daniel 9:24-27 is a Jewish prophecy that must be interpreted Jewishly and not by using the tools of another religion, which are prone to fail from the onset. I have posted a thread with the Jewish interpretation of that prophecy. Mind you that it does not have anything to do with Jesus.